Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Two experiments refine the incidental learning hypothesis of incongruent items during color-naming. In Exp. 1, the size of the incongruent item set was manipulated in a manual Stroop task. In Version 4, four different incongruent items were presented; in Version 8, eight different incongruent items were presented; and in Version 12, 12 different incongruent items were presented. Analysis showed color-naming response time was roughly equivalent for neutral and incongruent items in Version 4. Conversely, the Stroop effect not only was manifest but also was equivalent in Versions 8 and 12. In Exp. 2, the role of the phonological loop in the Stroop effect was investigated using Version 4 of Exp. 1. The Experimental group repeated aloud the syllable “LA” during the Incongruent color-naming condition. Articulatory suppression resulted in a significant increase in Incongruent color-naming response time. Implications for the interpretation of Stroop data are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Besner

Stolz

J. A.

Boutilier

(1997) The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 221–225.

Colle

H. A.

Welsh

(1976) Acoustic making in primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 17–32.

Graf

Schacter

D. L.

(1985) Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 501–518.

Hanley

J. R.

Bakopoulou

(2003) Irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and phonological similarity: a test of phonological loop model and the feature model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 435–444.

Huguet

Galvaing

M. P.

Monteil

J-M.

Dumas

(1999) Social presence effects in the Stroop task: further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1011–1025.

Kane

M. J.

Engle

R. W.

(2003) Working memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47–70.

Klein

G. S.

(1964) Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 576–588.

Logan

G. D.

(1980) Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: theory and data. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 523–553.

Logan

G. D.

(1988) Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.

10.

Logan

G. D.

Zbrodoff

N. J.

(1979) When it helps to be misled: facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 166–174.

11.

Logan

G. D.

Zbrodoff

N. J.

Williamson

(1984) Strategies in color-word Stroop task. Bulletin of Psychonomic Society, 22, 135–138.

12.

MacLeod

C. M.

(1991) Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.

13.

MacLeod

C. M.

Dunbar

(1988) Training and Stroop-like interference: evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 126–135.

14.

Musen

Squire

L. R.

(1993) On the implicit learning of new associations by amnesic patients and normal subjects. Neuropsychology, 7, 119–135.

15.

Reisberg

Baron

Kemler

D. G.

(1980) Overcoming Stroop interference: the effects of practice on distractor potency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception ana Performance, 6(1), 140–150.

16.

Salamé

Baddeley

A. D.

(1982) Disruption of short-term memory by irrelevant speech: implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 21, 150–164.

17.

Shimamura

A. P.

Squire

L. R.

(1989) Impaired priming of new associations in amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 763–770.

18.

Stroop

J. R.

(1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.

19.

Taylor

Clive

P. B.

(1983) Two forms of the Stroop test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57, 879–882.

20.

Wechsler

(1991). Echelle clinique de Mémoire de Wechsler–Révisée. Paris: Les Éditions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.

Incidental Learning of Incongruent Items in a Manual Version of the Stroop Task

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References