Three trail-making tasks were designed to yield measures of visuomotor speed, efficiency of visual search, and cognitive flexibility (attentional switching). Scores on paper-and-pencil trail-making performance tasks were analyzed in 54 neurologically nonimpaired participants (21 men, 33 women; M = 40 yr., SD = 15 yr.). In Study 1, a 5-item 3-task format of the new trail-making test was developed by selecting items based on psychometric characteristics. The tasks were visuomotor trail-making (one item), visual search (two items), and cognitive flexibility (two items). Estimates of internal consistency of the resulting test scores of the Brunswick Trail Making Test yielded acceptable values (.91 and .90). In Study 2, the effects of repeated practice on trail-making tasks were analyzed. Task repetition affected the performance in the three trail-making tasks differentially. On the visuomotor task, effects of repeated task practice were completely carried over to similar trails. Evidence for transfer of learning was obtained neither for the visual search task nor for the cognitive flexibility task. It is concluded that training effects of perceptual-motor and cognitive skills are highly specific. Implications of these findings for cognitive neurorehabilitation are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonJ. R. (1982) Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.
2.
ArbuthnottK.FrankJ. (2000) Trail Making Test Part B as a measure of executive control: Validation using a set-switching paradigm. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 518–528.
3.
CarneyN.ChesnutR. M.MaynardH.MannN. C.PattersonP.HelfandM. (1999) Effect of cognitive rehabilitation on outcomes for persons with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 14, 277–307.
4.
CharterR. A. (1999) Sample size requirements for precise estimates of reliability, generalizability, and validity coefficients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21, 559–566.
5.
CronbachL. J. (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal consistency structure of tests. Psychometrica, 16, 297–334.
6.
DelisD. C.KaplanE.KramerJ. H. (2001) Examiner's manual for the Delis-Kaplan Executive function System. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corp.
7.
DemakisG. J. (2003) A meta-analytic review of the sensitivity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test to frontal and lateralized frontal brain damage. Neuropsychology, 17, 233–264.
8.
DomineyP. F.HoenM.BlancJ. M.Lelekov-BoissardT. (2003) Neurological basis of language and sequential cognition: Evidence from simulation, aphasia, and ERP studies. Brain & Language, 86, 207–225.
9.
DraneD. L.YuspehR. L.HuthwaiteJ. S.KlinglerL. K. (2002) Demographic characteristics and normative observations for derived Trail-Making Test indices. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 15, 39–43.
10.
FranzenM. D. (2000) Reliability and validity in neuropsychological assessment. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
11.
Grill-SpectorK.HensonR.MartinA. (2006) Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 14–23.
12.
GuptaP.CohenN. J. (2002) Theoretical and computational analysis of Skill Learning, Repetition Priming, and Procedural Memory. Psychological Review, 109, 401–448.
13.
HallG. (1991) Perceptual and associative learning. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
14.
HeatonR. K.CheluneG. J.TalleyJ. L.KayG. G.CurtissG. (1993) Wisconsin Card Sorting Test manual: Revised and expanded. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
15.
HensonR. N. A. (1998) Short-term memory for serial order: The Start-End Model. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 73–137.
16.
KoppB.KunkelA.MühlnickelW.VillringerK.TaubE.FlorH. (1999) Plasticity in the motor system related to therapy-induced improvement of movement after stroke. Neuroreport, 10, 807–810.
17.
KoppB.WesselK. (2005) Psychometrische Aspekte der kognitiven Neurologie [Cognitive neurology from a psychometric perspective]. Aktuelle Neurologie, 32, 86–93.
18.
KuhlmanA.LittleD.SekulerR. (2006) An interactive test of serial behavior: Age and practice alter executive function. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 126–144.
19.
KunkelA.KoppB.MüllerG.VillringerK.VillringerA.TaubE.FlorH. (1999) Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 624–628.
20.
LashleyK. S. (1951) The problem of serial order of behavior. In JeffressL. A. (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior. New York: Wiley. Pp. 112–148.
21.
LezakM. D. (1995) Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford Univer. Press.
22.
LoftusG. R. (1978) On interpretation of interactions. Memory & Cognition, 6, 312–319.
23.
LoganG. D. (1988) Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.
24.
MacKayD. G. (1982) The problem of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior. Psychological Review, 89, 483–506.
25.
MilnerB. (1963) Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting. Archives of Neurology, 9, 100–110.
26.
MitrushinaM.BooneK. B.RafaniJ.D'EliaL. F. (2005) Handbook of normative data for neuropsychological assessment. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univer. Press.
27.
NelsonH. E. (1976) A Modified Card Sorting Test (MCST) sensitive to frontal defects. Cortex, 12, 313–324.
28.
NewellA.RosenbloomP. S. (1981) Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In AndersonJ. R. (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, NT: Erlbaum. Pp. 1–55.
29.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994) Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
30.
PartingtonJ. E.LeiterR. G. (1949) Partington's Pathway Test. The Psychological Service Center Bulletin, 1, 9–20.
31.
PrinzW. (1979) Locus of the effect of specific practice in continuous visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 137–142.
RaykovT. (2003) Scale reliability evaluation with LISREL 8.50. Fordham Univer., NY: Scientific Software International. {Document available at: http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/tenko.htm}.
34.
ReitanR. M. (1955) The relation of the Trail Making Test to organic brain damage. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 19, 393–394.
35.
ReynoldsC. R. (2002) Comprehensive Trail-Making Test (CTMT): Examiner's manual. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
36.
RickardT. C. (2004) Strategy execution in cognitive skill learning: An item-level test of candidate models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 65–82.
37.
RosenbaumD. A.CarlsonR. A.GilmoreR. O. (2001) Acquisition of intellectual and perceptual-motor skills. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 453–470.
38.
SalthouseT. A.FristoeN. M. (1995) Process analysis of adult age effects on a computer-administered Trail Making Test. Neuropsychology, 9, 518–528.
39.
SalthouseT. A.TothJ.DanielsK.ParksC.PakR.WolbretteM.HockingK. J. (2000) Effects of aging on efficiency of task switching in a variant of the Trail Making Test. Neuropsychology, 14, 102–111.
40.
SchneiderW.CheinJ. M. (2003) Controlled and automatic processing: From mechanisms to biology. Cognitive Science, 7, 525–559.
41.
SohlbergM.MateerC. (1989) Introduction to cognitive rehabilitation: Theory and practice. New York: Guilford.
42.
StraussE.ShermanE.SpreenO. (2006) A compendium of neuropsychological tests. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univer. Press.
43.
StussD. T.BisschopS. M.AlexanderM. P.LevineB.KatzD.IzukawaI. (2001) The Trail Making Test: A study in focal lesion patients. Psychological Assessment, 13, 230–239.
44.
TaubE.UswatteG.ElbertT. (2002) New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 228–236.
45.
ThompsonM. D.ScottJ. G.DicksonS. W.SchoenfeldJ. D.RuweW. D.AdamsR. L. (1999) Clinical utility of the Trail Making Test practice time. Clinical Neuropsychology, 13, 450–455.
46.
TombaughT. N. (2004) Trail Making Test A and B: Normative data stratified by age and education. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 203–214.
47.
TreismanA.GeladeG. (1980) A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
48.
UllmanM. T. (2001) A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 717–126.
49.
WillinghamD. B. (1998) A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 105, 558–584.
50.
WolfeJ. M. (1994) Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202–1238.
51.
YlvisakerM. (2003) Context-sensitive cognitive rehabilitation after brain injury: Theory and practice. Brain Impairment, 4, 1–16.
