Persons with multiple disabilities are often unable to interact with their environment due to their limited response repertoire. Microswitch programs are designed to help them control environmental events, generally preferred stimulation, through simple (feasible) responses. To make microswitch programs a more widely usable and relevant resource for intervention with these persons, a number of new developments were pursued in recent years. This paper examines three of those developments as specifically addressed in our research activity, namely, (a) assessment of new, nontypical responses and matching microswitches, (b) fostering of multiple responses and exercise of choice, and (c) targeting of habilitative and clinical (therapeutic) objectives. The encouraging outcomes of these developments are reviewed in relation to their potentially wide implications for daily practice and the need of additional developments in the area.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlgozzineB.BrowderD.KarvonenM.TestD. W.WoodW. M. (2001) Effects of intervention to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71, 219–277.
2.
AntonucciM.LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.SigafoosJ.OlivaD. (2006) Enabling a man with multiple disabilities and limited motor behavior to perform a functional task with help of microswitch technology. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 103, 83–88.
3.
BartlettD. J.PalisanoR. J. (2002) Physical therapists' perceptions of factors influencing the acquisition of motor abilities of children with cerebral palsy: Implications for clinical reasoning. Physical Therapy, 82, 237–248.
4.
BrooksA.ToddA. W.TofflemoyerS.HornerR. H. (2003) Use of functional assessment and a self-management system to increase academic engagement and work completion. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5, 144–152.
5.
CannellaH. I.O'ReillyM. F.LancioniG. E. (2005) Choice and preference assessment research with people with severe to profound developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 1–15.
6.
CrawfordM. R.SchusterJ. W. (1993) Using microswitches to teach toy use. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 5, 349–368.
7.
FelceD.PerryJ. (1995) Quality of life: Its definition and measurement. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16, 51–74.
8.
FerrierL. J.FellH. J.MoorajZ.DeltaH.MoscoeD. (1996) Baby-babble-blanket: Infant interface with automatic data collection. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 110–119.
9.
FineM.GlendinningC. (2005) Dependence, independence or inter-dependence? Revisiting the concepts of ‘care’ and ‘dependency’. Aging and Society, 25, 601–621.
10.
GutowskiS. J. (1996) Response acquisition for music or beverages in adults with profound multiple handicaps. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 8, 221–231.
11.
HolburnS.NguyenD.VietzeP. M. (2004) Computer-assisted learning for adults with profound multiple disabilities. Behavioral interventions, 19, 25–37.
12.
HourcadeJ.PilotteT. E.WestE.ParetteP. (2004) A history of augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with severe and profound disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19, 235–244.
13.
IvancicM. T.BaileyJ. S. (1996) Current limits to reinforcement identification for some persons with profound multiple disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 17, 77–92.
14.
KetelaarM.VermeerA.HartH.Van Petegem-van BeekE.HeldersP. J. (2001) Effects of a functional therapy program on motor abilities of children with cerebral palsy. Physical Therapy, 81, 1534–1545.
15.
KinsleyT. C.LangoneJ. (1995) Application of technology for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 312–324.
16.
KoM. L. B.McConachieH.JolleffN. (1998) Outcome of recommendations for augmentative communication in children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 24, 195–205.
17.
LachapelleY.WehmeyerM. L.HaelewyckM. C.CourboisY.KeithK. D.SchalockR.VerdugoM. A.WalshP. N. (2005) The relationship between quality of life and self-determination: An international study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 740–744.
18.
LancioniG. E.LemsS. (2001) Using a microswitch for vocalization responses with persons with multiple disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23, 745–748.
19.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.BasiliG. (2001) Use of microswitches and speech output systems with people with severe/profound intellectual or multiple disabilities: A literature review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22, 21–40.
20.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.OlivaD.CoppaM. M. (2001a) A microswitch for vocalization responses to foster environmental control in children with multiple disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 271–275.
21.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.OlivaD.CoppaM. M. (2001b) Using multiple microswitches to promote different responses in children with multiple disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22, 309–318.
22.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.OlivaD.SinghN. N.CoppaM. M. (2002) Multiple microswitches for multiple responses with children with profound disabilities. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 31, 81–87.
23.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SigafoosJ.SinghN. N.OlivaD.BasiliG. (2004) Enabling a person with multiple disabilities and minimal motor behaviour to control environmental stimulation with chin movements. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 1291–1294.
24.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.GroenewegJ.BoscoA.TotaA.SmaldoneA.StasollaF.ManfrediF.BaccaniS.PidalaS. (2006) A social validation assessment of microswitch-based programs for persons with multiple disabilities employing teacher trainees and parents as raters. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 18, 383–391.
25.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.OlivaD.BaccaniS.SeveriniL.GroenewegJ. (2006) Micro-switch programmes for students with multiple disabilities and minimal motor behaviour: Assessing response acquisition and choice. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 9, 137–143.
26.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.OlivaD.CoppaM. M.MontironiG. (2005) A new microswitch to enable a boy with minimal motor behavior to control environmental stimulation with eye blinks. Behavioral Interventions, 20, 147–153.
27.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.OlivaD.GroenewegJ. (2002) Impact of stimulation versus microswitch-based programs on indices of happiness of people with profound multiple disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 23, 149–160.
28.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.OlivaD.PiazzollaG.GattoL.SmaldoneA. (2006) Multiple microswitches for persons with multiple disabilities: A basic procedure to examine the persons' choice behavior. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 102, 13–16.
29.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.OlivaD.PiazzollaG.PiraniP.GroenewegJ. (2002) Evaluating the use of multiple microswitches and responses for children with multiple disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46, 346–351.
30.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.OlivaD.ScaliniL.VigoC. M.GroenewegJ. (2005a) Further evaluation of microswitch clusters to enhance hand response and head control in persons with multiple disabilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 689–694.
31.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.OlivaD.ScaliniL.VigoC. M.GroenewegJ. (2005b) Microswitch clusters to enable hand responses and appropriate head position in two children with multiple disabilities. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 8, 59–62.
32.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.OlivaD.ScaliniVigoC. M.GroenewegJ. (2005c) Microswitch clusters to enhance adaptive responses and head control: A programme extension for three children with multiple disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27, 637–641.
33.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.SigafoosJ.DiddenR.OlivaD.MontironiG. (2007) Persons with multiple disabilities and minimal motor behavior using small forehead movements and new microswitch technology to control environmental stimuli. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104, 870–878.
34.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.SigafoosJ.DiddenR.OlivaD.MontironiG.La MartireM. L. (2007) Small hand-closure movements used as a response through microswitch technology by persons with multiple disabilities and minimal motor behavior. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104, 1027–1034.
35.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.SigafoosJ.DiddenR.OlivaD.SeveriniL. (2006) A microswitch-based program to enable students with multiple disabilities to choose among environmental stimuli. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 100, 488–493.
36.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.SigafoosJ.OlivaD.BaccaniS.GroenewegJ. (2006) Microswitch clusters promote adaptive responses and reduce finger mouthing in a boy with multiple disabilities. Behavior Modification, 30, 892–900.
37.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.SigafoosJ.OlivaD.SeveriniL. (2006) Enabling persons with multiple disabilities to choose among environmental stimuli and request stimulus repetitions through microswitch and computer technology. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 103, 354–362.
38.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.SigafoosJ.TotaA.AntonucciM.OlivaD. (2006) Children with multiple disabilities and minimal motor behavior using chin movements to operate microswitches to obtain environmental stimulation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 290–298.
39.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.OlivaD.ScaliniL.GroenewegJ. (2003) Microswitch clusters to enhance non-spastic response schemes with students with multiple disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 301–304.
40.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.CampodonicoF.OlivaD.VigoC. M. (2005) Promoting walker-assisted step responses by an adolescent with multiple disabilities through automatically delivered stimulation. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 99, 109–113.
41.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.CampodonicoF.PiazzollaG.ScaliniL.OlivaD. (2005) Impact of favorite stimuli automatically delivered on step responses of persons with multiple disabilities during their use of walker devices. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 71–76.
42.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.La MartireM. L.StasollaF.SmaldoneA.OlivaD. (2006) Microswitch-based programs as therapeutic recreation interventions for students with profound multiple disabilities. American Journal of Recreation Therapy, 5, 15–20.
43.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.OlivaD. (2003) Extending microswitch-based programs for people with multiple disabilities: Use of words and choice opportunities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 139–148.
44.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.OlivaD. (2004) A microswitch program including words and choice opportunities for students with multiple disabilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 214–222.
45.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.OlivaD. (2005) Microswitch programs for persons with multiple disabilities: An overview of the responses adopted for microswitch activation. Cognitive Processing, 6, 177–188.
46.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.OlivaD.BasiliG. (2005) An overview of research on increasing indices of happiness of people with severe/profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27, 83–93.
47.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.OlivaD.GroenewegJ. (2005) Enabling a girl with multiple disabilities to control her favorite stimuli through vocalization and a dual-microphone microswitch. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 99, 179–182.
48.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.OlivaD.MontironiG.ChierchieS. (2004) Assessing a new response-microswitch combination with a boy with minimal motor behavior. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 459–462.
49.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.OlivaD.ScaliniL.GroenewegJ. (2004) Improving assisted ambulation in a man with multiple disabilities through the use of a microswitch cluster. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 32, 245–249.
50.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.OlivaD.ScaliniL.VigoC. M.GroenewegJ. (2004) Microswitch clusters to support responding and appropriate posture of students with multiple disabilities: Three case evaluations. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 501–505.
51.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.OlivaD.SeveriniL. (2005) Assessing a microswitch-based stimulation procedure for eye-blinking responses in a young woman with profound multiple disabilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 101, 212–216.
52.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.SigafoosJ.DiddenR.OlivaD.SeveriniL. (2007) Fostering adaptive responses and head control in students with multiple disabilities through a microswitch-based program: Follow-up assessment and program revision. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 187–196.
53.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.SigafoosJ.DiddenR.OlivaD.SeveriniL.SmaldoneA.TotaA.La MartireM. L. (2007) Effects of microswitch-based programs on indices of happiness of students with multiple disabilities: A new research evaluation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 112, 167–176.
54.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.SigafoosJ.OlivaD.AntonucciM. (2006) A microswitch-based programme to enable a boy with multiple disabilities and minimal motor behaviour to choose among environmental stimuli. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1, 205–208.
55.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.SigafoosJ.OlivaD.BaccaniS. (2007) Enabling students with multiple disabilities to request and choose among environmental stimuli through microswitch and computer technology. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 50–58.
56.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.SigafoosJ.OlivaD.CostantiniA.GattoS.MarinelliV.PutzoluA. (2006) An optic microswitch for an eyelid response to foster environmental control in children with minimal motor behaviour. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 9, 53–56.
57.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.SigafoosJ.OlivaD.MontironiG. (2004) Evaluating a computer system used as a microswitch for word utterances of persons with multiple disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 1286–1290.
58.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.SigafoosJ.OlivaD.PiazzollaG.PidalaS.SmaldoneA.ManfrediF. (2007) Automatically delivered stimulation for walker-assisted step responses: Measuring its effects in persons with multiple disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 19, 1–13.
59.
LancioniG. E.SmaldoneA.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.SigafoosJ.OlivaD.BosgoA. (2007) Promoting adaptive hand responding and reducing face hiding in a woman with profound developmental disabilities using microswitch technology. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 35, 225–230.
60.
LeatherbyJ. K.GastD. L.WoleryM.CollinsB. C. (1992) Assessment of reinforcer preference in multi-handicapped students. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 4, 15–36.
61.
LeeS. H.SimpsonR. L.ShogrenK. A. (2007) Effects and implications of self-management for students with autism: A meta-analysis. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 2–13.
62.
LenkerJ. A.PaquetV. L. (2004) A new conceptual model for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assistive Technology, 16, 1–10.
63.
MiltenbergerR. G. (2004) Behavior modification: Principles and procedures. (3rd ed.) London: Wadsworth.
64.
MoserI. (2006) Disability and the promises of technology: Technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal. Information, Communication and Society, 9, 373–395.
65.
MurphyK. M.SaundersM. D.SaundersR. R.OlswangL. B. (2004) Effects of ambient stimuli on measures of behavioral state and microswitch use in adults with profound multiple impairments. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 25, 355–370.
66.
PetryK.MaesB.VlaskampC. (2005) Domains of quality of life of people with profound multiple disabilities: The perspective of parents and direct support staff. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18, 35–46.
67.
RealonR. E.FavellJ. E.DayvaultK. A. (1988) Evaluating the use of adapted leisure materials on the engagement of persons who are profoundly multiply handicapped. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 23, 228–237.
68.
ReidD. H.PhillipsJ. F.GreenC. W. (1991) Teaching persons with profound multiple handicaps: A review of the effects of behavior research. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 319–336.
69.
SaundersM. D.QuestadK. A.KedziorskiT. L.BoaseB. C.PattersonE. A.CullinanT. B. (2001) Unprompted mechanical switch use in individuals with severe multiple disabilities: An evaluation of the effects of body positions. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 13, 27–39.
70.
SchalockR.BrownI.BrownR.CumminsR. A.FelceD.MatikkaL.KeithK. D.ParmenterT. (2002) Conceptualization, measurement, and application of quality of life for persons with intellectual disabilities: Reports of an international panel of experts. Mental Retardation, 40, 457–470.
71.
SchererM. J.SaxC.VanbiervlietA.CushmanL. A.SchererJ. V. (2005) Predictors of assistive technology use: The importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27, 1321–1331.
72.
SobseyD.ReichleJ. (1989) Components of reinforcement for attention signal switch activation. Mental Retardation and Learning Disability Bulletin, 17, 46–60.
73.
SullivanM. W.LaverickD. H.LewisM. (1995) Fostering environmental control in a young child with Rett syndrome: A case study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25, 215–221.
74.
SullivanM. W.LewisM. (1993) Contingency, means-end skills, and the use of technology in infant intervention. Infants and Young Children, 5, 58–77.
75.
TotaA.LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.SigafoosJ.OlivaD. (2006) Evaluating the applicability of optic microswitches for eyelid responses in students with profound multiple disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1, 217–223.
76.
TurpinG.ArmstrongJ.FrostP.FineB.WardsC. D.PinningtonL. L. (2005) Evaluation of alternative computer input devices used by people with disabilities. Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, 29, 119–129.
77.
WehmeyerM. L. (1999) A functional model of self-determination: Describing development and implementing instruction. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14, 53–61.
