Subjective estimates and associated confidence ratings for the solutions of some classic occupancy problems were studied in samples of 721 psychology undergraduates, 39 casino visitors, and 34 casino employees. On tasks varying the classic birthday problem, i.e., the probability P for any coincidence among N individuals sharing the same birthday, clear majorities of respondents markedly overestimated N, given P, and markedly underestimated P, given N. Respondents did notedly better on tasks varying the birthmate problem, i.e., P for the specific coincidence among N individuals of having a birthday today. Psychology students and women did better on both task types, but were less confident about their estimates than casino visitors or personnel and men. Several further person variables, such as indicators of topical knowledge and familiarity, were associated with better and more confident performance on birthday problems, but not on birthmate problems. Likewise, higher confidence ratings were related to subjective estimates that were closer to the solutions of birthday problems, but not of birthmate problems. Implications of and possible explanations for these findings, study limitations, directions for further inquiry, and the real-world relevance of ameliorating misconceptions of probability are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ. (1982) Gene duplication and the birthday problem. Nature, 296, 176ndash;177.
2.
BaumL. E.BillingsleyP. (1969) Asymptotic distributions for the coupon collector's problem. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 36, 1835ndash;1839.
3.
BerresfordG. C. (1980) The uniformity assumption in the birthday problem. Mathematics Magazine, 53, 286ndash;288.
4.
BlomG.HolstL. (1989) Some properties of similar pairs. Advances in Applied Probability, 21, 941ndash;944.
5.
BloomD. M. (1973) A birthday problem. American Mathematical Monthly, 80, 1141ndash;1142.
6.
CohenS.SmithG.ChechileR. A.BurnsG.TsaiF. (1996) Identifying impediments to learning probability and statistics from an assessment of instructional software. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 35ndash;54.
7.
CosmidesL. (1989) The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187ndash;276.
8.
CrillyT.NandyS. (1987) The birthday problem for boys and girls. Mathematical Gazette, 71, 19ndash;22.
9.
DawkinsB. (1991) Siobhan's problem: The coupon collector revisited. American Statistician, 45, 76ndash;82.
10.
delMasR. C.BartW. M. (1989) The role of an evaluation exercise in the resolution of misconceptions of probability. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11, 39ndash;54.
11.
DiaconisP.HolmesS. (1997) Are there still things to do in Bayesian statistics?Ekenntnis: An International Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 45, 145ndash;158.
12.
DiaconisP.MostellerF. (1989) Methods for studying coincidences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 853ndash;861.
13.
EverittB. S. (1998) The Cambridge dictionary of statistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer Press.
14.
FangK-T. (1985) Occupancy problems. In KotzS.JohnsonN. L. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. Vol. 6. New York: Wiley. Pp. 402–406.
15.
FellerW. (1950/1968) An introduction to probability theory and its applications. (3rd ed.) New York: Wiley.
16.
FischbeinE. (1987) Intuition in science and mathematics: An educational approach. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
17.
FischbeinE.GazitA. (1984) Does the teaching of probability improve probabilistic intuitions?Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 1ndash;24.
18.
FischbeinE.SchnarchD. (1997) The evolution with age of probabilistic, intuitively based misconceptions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 96ndash;105.
GailM. H.WeissG. H.MantelN.O'BrienS. J. (1979) A solution to the generalized birthday problem with application to allozyme screening for cell culture contamination. Journal of Applied Probability, 16, 242ndash;251.
21.
GigerenzerG.ToddP. M., & The ABC Research Group (1999) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univer Press.
22.
GlennJ. A.LittlerG. H. (1984) Dictionary of mathematics. Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble.
23.
GlickN. (1970) Hijacking planes to Cuba: An updated version of the birthday problem. American Statistician, 24, 41ndash;44.
24.
HawxinsA. S.KapadiaR. (1984) Children's conceptions of probability: A psychological and pedagogical review. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 349ndash;377.
25.
HeathD. C.SanchezP. (1986) On the adequacy of pseudorandom number generators (or: How big a period do we need?). Operations Research Letters, 5, 3ndash;6.
26.
JiangZ.PotterW. D. (1993) A mathematical microworld for students to learn introductory probability. Mathematics Educator, 4, 4ndash;12.
27.
JohnsonJ. M. (1997) The birthday problem explained. Mathematics Teacher, 90, 20ndash;22.
28.
KonoldC.PollatsekA.WellA.LohmeierJ.LipsonA. (1993) Inconsistencies in students' reasoning about probability. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 392ndash;414.
29.
MaseS. (1992) Approximation to the birthday problem with unequal occurrence probabilities and their application to the surname problem in Japan. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 44, 479ndash;499.
30.
MaseS. (1993) A birthday problem solution for nonuniform birth frequencies. American Statistician, 47, 312.
31.
MatthewsR.StonesF. (1998) Coincidences: The truth is out there. Teaching Statistics, 20, 17ndash;19.
32.
MatthewsR. A. J.BlackmoreS. J. (1995) Why are coincidences so impressive?Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 1121ndash;1122.
33.
MeddisR. (1984) Statistics using ranks: A unified approach. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
34.
MostellerF. (1962) Understanding the birthday problem. The Mathematics Teacher, 55, 322ndash;325.
35.
MostellerF. (1965) Fifty challenging problems in probability with solutions. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
36.
MostellerF.RourkeR. E.ThomasG. B. (1961) Probability with statistical applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
37.
MunfordA. G. (1977) A note on the uniformity assumption in the birthday problem. American Statistician, 31, 119.
38.
NunnikhovenT. S. (1992) A birthday problem solution for nonuniform birth frequencies. American Statistician, 46, 270ndash;274.
39.
PaulosJ. A. (1988) Innumeracy: Mathematical illiteracy and its consequences. New York: Vintage Books.
40.
RiceJ. A. (1995) Mathematical statistics and data analysis. (2nd ed.) Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
41.
RustP. F. (1976) The effect of leap years and seasonal trends on the birthday problem. American Statistician, 30, 197ndash;198.
42.
SachsL. (1997) Angewandte Statistik [Applied statistics]. (8th ed.) Berling: Springer.
StewartI. (1998) What a coincidence!Scientific American, 278(6), 76–77; and 279(5), 89.
45.
von MisesR. (1939)/1964) Über Aufteilungs- und Besetzungs-Wahrscheinlichkeiten [About allocation and occupancy probabilities]. Reprinted in Selected papers of Richard von Mises. Vol. 2. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. Pp. 313–334.
46.
VoracekM.KrutilA.DeublerC. (2001) The birthday problem: Students' misconceptions of probability. In KallusK. W.PosthumusN.JiménezP. (Eds.), Current psychological research in Austria: Proceedings of the 4th Scientific Conference of the Austrian Psychological Society (ÖGP). Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt. Pp. 183–186.
47.
WilsonE. O. (1999) Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage Books.
48.
WinterH. (1992) Zur intuitiven Aufklärung probabilistischer Paradoxien [On the intuitive clarification of probabilistic paradoxes]. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 13, 23ndash;53.
