Field Dependence and Stimulus Complexity in a Figure Copying Task

Abstract

Field dependence is often associated with studies of cognitive style from Witkin's laboratory but Piaget also considered the concept a fundamental factor in the development of visuoperceptual analysis. Assessment has traditionally relied on two measures, the Rod-and-Frame Test and the Embedded Figures Test. A new task was developed, based on the Rod-and-Frame Test, in which a target stimulus is drawn within a misleading frame. Misleading frames significantly influenced the orientation of drawings created by 36 kindergartners in Exp. 1, and the drawing of more complex stimulus figures was influenced by the frames for a group of 65 adults in Exp. 2. Field-dependent behavior is related to the complexity of the task and to age. The correlation of scores on the Embedded Figures Test with performance on this task was low for both groups.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amador-Campos

J. A.

Kirchner-Nebot

(1997) Relations of scores on Children's Embedded Figures Test with age, item difficulty and internal consistency. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85,675–682.

Amador-Campos

J. A.

Kirchner-Nebot

(1999) Correlations among scores on measures of field dependence-independence cognitive style, cognitive ability, and sustained attention. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88,236–239.

Bagust

(2005) Assessment of verticality perception by a Rod-and-Frame Test: Preliminary observations on the use of a computer monitor and video eye glasses. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86,1062–1064.

Broderick

Laszlo

J. I.

(1988) The effects of varying planning demands on drawing components of squares and diamonds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 45,18–27.

Chen

Levi

D. M.

(1996) Angle judgment: Is the whole the sum of its parts? Vision Research, 36,1721–1735.

Kandel

E. R.

Schwartz

J. H.

Jessell

T. M.

(1991) Principles of neural science. (3rd ed.) New York: Elsevier.

Karp

S. A.

Konstadt

(1971) The Children's Embedded Figures Test (CEFT). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Lunsford

M. A.

Dannemilier

J. L.

(2006) Additive effects in a rod-and-frame illusion estimated by response classification. Journal of Vision, 6,366–378.

McKenna

F. P.

(1984) Measures of field dependence: Cognitive style or cognitive ability? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47,593–603.

10.

Miyake

Witzki

A. H.

Emerson

M. J.

(2001) Field dependence-independence from a working memory perspective: A dual-task investigation of the Hidden Figures Test. Memory, 9,445–457.

11.

Morra

(2002) On the relationship between partial occlusion drawing, M capacity and field independence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20,421–438.

12.

Nolan

Grigorenko

Thorstensson

(2005) Balance control: Sex and age differences in 9- to 16-year-olds. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 47,449–454.

13.

Piaget

(1969) The mechanisms of perception. New York: Basic Books.

14.

Piaget

Inhelder

(1956) The child's conception of space. New York: Norton.

15.

Tinajero

Paramo

M. F.

Quiroga

M. A.

Rodriguez-Gonzalez

(2000) Comparative analysis of different correction methods for measuring Rod-and-Frame test performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90,93–101.

16.

Witkin

H. A.

Asch

S. E.

(1948) Studies in space orientation: IV. Further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38,762–782.

17.

Witkin

H. A.

Oltman

P. A.

Raskin

Karp

S. A.

(1971/2002) Group Embedded Figures Test manual. Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.

18.

Zhang

(2004) Field-dependence/independence: Cognitive style or perceptual ability? Validating against thinking styles and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 37,1295–1311.