It is well known that an auditory startle response can be modulated by several processes. In the present study shock sensitization and fear potentiation were examined in 17 hamsters to assess whether response enhancement is similar for another rodent. Immediately after presentation of electrical foot shocks, the auditory startle response increased significantly. This response was also enhanced after fear conditioning in the Experimental group using a light as a conditioned stimulus (CS) and the foot shock as the unconditioned stimulus (US). The auditory startle response remained unchanged in the Control group after nonpaired presentation of CS and US. Significant correlation between enhancement of the auditory startle response in sensitization and fear conditioning was found for the Experimental group. Shock sensitivity and effect of fear on modulation of the auditory startle response in hamsters are similar to those of other rodents. Further, neural mechanisms underlying enhancement of the auditory startle response seem not to be responsible for the deficit of prepulse inhibition in hamsters.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChesterJ. A.MullinsA. J.NguyenC. H.WattsV. J.MeiselR. L. (2006) Repeated quinpirole treatments produce neurochemical sensitization and associated behavioral changes in female hamsters. Psychopharmacology, 188, 53–62.
2.
DavisM. (1989) Sensitization of the acoustic startle reflex by footshock. Behavioral Neuroscience, 103, 495–503.
3.
DavisM. (1997) Neurobiology of fear responses: The role of the amygdala. Journal of Neuropsychology and Clinical Neuroscience, 9, 382–402.
4.
FendtM.KochM.SchnitzlerH. U. (1994) Sensorimotor gating deficit after lesions of the superior colliculus. NeuroReport, 5, 1725–1728.
5.
FendtM.KochM.SchnitzlerH. U. (1996) NMDA receptors in the pontine brainstem are necessary for fear potentiation of the startle response. European Journal of Pharmacology, 318, 1–6.
6.
FendtM.LiangL.YeomansJ. S. (2001) Brain stem circuits mediating prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex. Psychopharmacology, 156, 216–224.
7.
GeyerM. A.SwerdlowN. R.MansbachR. S.BraffD. L. (1990) Startle response models of sensorimotor gating and habituation deficits in schizophrenia. Brain Research Bulletin, 25, 485–498.
8.
GreenwaldM. K.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N.LangP. J. (1998) Sensitization and conditioning scores showed modest, significant correlations in human. Behavioral Neuroscience, 112, 1069–1079.
9.
HarveyJ. A. (2003) Role of the serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptor in learning. Learning and Memory, 10, 355–362.
10.
HitchcockJ. M.DavisM. (1986) Lesions of the amygdala, but not of the cerebellum or red nucleus, block conditioned fear as measured with the potentiated startle paradigm. Behavioral Neuroscience, 100, 11–22.
11.
HitchcockJ. M.SananesC. B.DavisM. (1989) Sensitization of the startle reflex by footshock: Blockade by lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala or its efferent pathway to the brainstem. Behavioral Neuroscience, 103, 509–518.
12.
HoffmanH. S.IsonJ. R. (1980) Reflex modification in the domain of startle: 1. Some empirical findings and their implications for how the nervous system processes sensory input. Psychological Review, 87, 175–189.
13.
HoffmanH. S.SearleJ. L. J. (1965) Acoustic variables in the modification of startle reaction in the rat. Journal of Comparative Physiological Psychology, 60, 53–58.
14.
KochM. (1999) The neurobiology of startle. Progress in Neurobiology, 59, 107–128.
15.
KochM.KungelM.HerbertH. (1993) Cholinergic neurons in the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus are involved in the mediation of prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response in the rat. Experimental Brain Research, 97, 71–82.
16.
KochM.SchnitzlerH. U. (1997) The acoustic startle response in rats—circuits mediating evocation, inhibition, and potentiation. Behavioral Brain Research, 89, 35–49.
17.
LeatonR. N.BorszczG. S. (1985) Potentiated startle: Its relation to freezing and shock intensity in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavioral Process, 11, 421–428.
18.
LingenhöhlK.FriaufE. (1994) Giant neurons in the rat reticular formation: A sensorimotor interface in the elementary acoustic startle circuit?Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 1176–1194.
19.
MasuM.IwakabeH.TagawaY.MiyoshiT.YamashitaM.FukudaY.SasakiH.HiroiK.NakamuraY.ShigemotoR.TakadaM.NakamuraK.NakaoK.KatsukiM.NakanishiS. (1995) Specific deficit of the ON response in visual transmission by targeted disruption of the mGluR6 gene. Cell, 80, 757–765.
20.
MongeluziD. L.HoppeT. A.FrostW. N. (1998) Prepulse inhibition of the Tritonia escape swim. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 867–872.
21.
RichardsonR. (2000) Shock sensitization of startle: Learned or unlearned fear?Behavioral Brain Research, 110, 109–117.
22.
RossJ. F.GrossmanL.GrossmanS. P. (1975) Some behavioral effects of transecting ventral or dorsal fiber connections of the septum in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 89, 5–18.
23.
SananesC. B. (1992) N-methyl-D-aspartate lesions of the lateral and basolateral nuclei of the amygdala block fear-potentiated startle and shock sensitization of startle. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 72–80.
24.
SasakiH.FukudaY. (2001) Prepulse inhibition in the rat anesthetized with α-chloralose. Neuroscience Research, (Suppl.), 25, S116.
25.
SasakiH.FukudaY.HayashiY. (1991) ON and OFF components of receptive fields have different latencies in the superior colliculus of golden hamsters. Brain Research, 540, 345–348.
26.
SasakiH.FukudaY.HayashiY. (1993) Early and late flash-induced field responses correspond to on and off receptive field components in the hamster superior colliculus. Progress in Brain Research, 95, 103–110.
27.
SasakiH.InoueT.CoffeyP.FukudaY. (1999) Recovery of visual function as revealed by prepulse effects in hamsters with the peripheral nerve graft. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 25, p. 2263.
28.
SasakiH.InoueT.FukudaY. (1998) Effects of ON and OFF prepulses on the startle responses in hamsters. Neuroscience ResearchSuppl., 22, S178.
29.
SasakiH.InoueT.IsoH.FukudaY. (1999) Recovery of visual behaviors in adult hamsters with the peripheral nerve graft to the sectioned optic nerve. Experimental Neurology, 159, 377–390.
30.
SasakiH.InoueT.IsoH.FukudaY.HayashiY. (1993) Light-dark discrimination after sciatic nerve transplantation to the sectioned optic nerve in adult hamsters. Vision Research, 33, 877–880.
31.
SasakiH.IsoH. (1996) Conditioned emotional responses in hamsters with restored visual pathway by peripheral nerve graft. International Journal of Psychology, 31, 309.
32.
SasakiH.IsoH.CoffeyP.InoueT.FukudaY. (1998) Prepulse facilitation of auditory startle response in hamsters. Neuroscience Letters, 248, 117–120.
33.
SchanbacherA.KochM.PilzP. K.SchnitzlerH. U. (1996) Lesions of the amygdala do not affect the enhancement of the acoustic startle response by background noise. Physiology and Behavior, 60, 1341–1346.
34.
SwerdlowN. R.BraffD. L.GeyerM. A. (2000) Animal models of deficient sensorimotor gating: What we know, what we think we know, and what we hope to know soon. Behavioral Pharmacology, 11, 185–204.
35.
SwerdlowN. R.BraffD. L.TaaidN.GeyerM. A. (1994) Assessing the validity of an animal model of sensorimotor gating deficient in schizophrenic patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 139–154.
36.
SwerdlowN. R.GeyerM. A.BraffD. L. (2001) Neural circuit regulation of prepulse inhibition of startle in the rat: Current knowledge and future challenges. Psychopharmacology, 156, 194–215.
37.
SwerdlowN. R.PaulsenJ.BraffD. L.ButtersN.GeyerM. A.SwensonM. R. (1995) Impaired prepulse inhibition of acoustic and tactile startle response in patients with Huntington's disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 58, 192–200.
38.
WalkerD. L.DavisM. (2002) The role of amygdala glutamate receptors in fear learning, fear-potentiated startle, and extinction. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 71, 379–392.
