A long-standing debate on assessment has troubled research on field dependence–independence. The main arguments and a recent measurement proposal by Riding, et al., are revised to illustrate the futility of this debate and to defend the strength of the cognitive style dimension.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArthurW.DayD. V. (1991) Examination of the construct validity of alternative measures of field dependence/independence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 12,851–859.
2.
CassidyS. (2004) Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Psychology, 24,419–444.
3.
ChernyshenkoO. S.StarkS.DrasgowF.RobertsB. W. (2007) Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process: Toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures. Psychological Assessment, 19,88–106.
4.
EmmettD.CliffordB. R.GwyerP. (2003) An investigation of the interaction between cognitive style and context reinstatement on the memory performance of eyewitnesses. Personality and Individual Differences, 34,1495–1508.
5.
HayesJ.AllisonC. W. (1998) Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in organizations. Human Relations, 51,847–871.
6.
JohnsonJ.PriorS.ArtusoM. (2000) Field dependence as a factor in second language communicative production. Language Learning, 50,529–567.
7.
MarendazC. (1985) Precedence globale et dependence du champ: Des routines visuelles?Cahiers de Psychologi Cognitive, 5,727–745.
8.
McDanielM. A.WhetzelD. (2005) Situational judgment test research: Informing the debate on practical intelligence theory. Intelligence, 33,515–525.
9.
McKennaF. P. (1984) Measures of field dependence: Cognitive style or cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47,593–603.
10.
MessickS. (1984) The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19,59–74.
11.
MessickS. (1994) The matter of style: Manifestations of personality in cognition, learning, and teaching. Educational Psychologist, 29,121–136.
12.
MessickS. (1996) Bridging cognition and personality in education: The role of style in performance and development. European Journal of Personality, 10,353–376.
13.
MoranA. P. (1985) Unresolved issues in research of field dependence–independence. Social Behavior and Personality, 13,119–125.
14.
PetersonR.DearyI. (2006) Examining wholistic-analytic style using preferences in early information processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 41,3–14.
15.
RichardsonJ. A.TurnerT. E. (2000) Field dependence revisited: I. Intelligence. Educational Psychology, 20,255–270.
16.
RidingR. (1991) Cognitive styles analysis. Birmingham: UK: Learning and Training Technology.
17.
RidingR.CheemaI. (1991) Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11,193–215.
18.
RidingR.PearsonF. (1994) The relationship between cognitive style and intelligence. Educational Psychology, 14,413–425.
19.
TinajeroC.PáramoM. F. (1997) Field dependence–independence and academic achievement: A reexamination of their relationship. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67,199–212.
20.
TinajeroC.PáramoM. F. (1998) Field dependence-independence and academic achievement: A review of research and theory. European Journal of Education, 13,227–251.
21.
WitkinH. A. (1950) Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures. Journal of Personality, 19,1–15.
22.
WitkinH. A.AschS. B. (1948a) Studies in space orientation: III. Perception of the upright in the absence of visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38,603–614.
23.
WitkinH. A.AschS. B. (1948b) Studies in space orientation: IV. Further experiments on perception of the up-right with displaced visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38,762–782.
24.
WitkinH. A.OltmanP. K.RaskinE.KarpS. A. (1971) A manual for the embedded figures tests. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
25.
ZhangL. F.SternbergR. J. (2006) The nature of intellectual styles. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
