In a recent note, Mizuguchi (2006) stated that beats are not directly related to the meaning of the production of speech. We report a number of studies that suggest the existence of a clear relationship between beats and significant parts of co-occurring speech.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeattieG. (2003) Visible thought: The new psychology of body language. Hove, UK: Routledge.
2.
ChieffiS.RicciM. (2005) Gesture production and text structure. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 101,435–439.
3.
HadarU. (1989) Two types of gesture and their role in speech production. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 8,221–228.
4.
KendonA. (1983) Gesture and speech: How they interact. In WiemannJ. M.HarrisonR. P. (Eds.), Nonverbal interaction. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Pp 13–45.
5.
KendonA. (1986) Some reasons for studying gesture. Semiotica, 62,3–28.
KintschW. (1974) The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
KintschW.van DijkT. A. (1978) Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85,363–394.
9.
McNeillD. (1985) So you think gestures are nonverbal?Psychological Review, 92,350–371.
10.
McNeillD. (1986) Iconic gestures of children and adults. Semiotica, 62,107–128.
11.
McNeillD. (2005) Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: The Univer. of Chicago Press.
12.
McNeillD.LevyE. (1982) Conceptual representations in language activity and gesture. In JarvellaR.KleinW. (Eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics. Chichester, UK: Wiley. Pp 271–295.
13.
MizuguchiT. (2006) Significance of definition and classification of a gesture for study of spontaneous gesture: Comment on Chieffi and Ricci's study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 103,461–462.
