The assumption that prism adaptation mechanisms evolved for developmental plasticity was questioned by analyzing natural transformations (magnification, rotation, displacement) of the arm and shoulder. Accommodating ordinary movement was found to be a closer match to prisms than transformations caused by growth. In addition, overlap between equations of movement and growth may point to a distal function of adaptation that is very general.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BedfordF. L. (1999) Keeping perception accurate. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 4–12.
2.
HeldR. (1965) Plasticity in sensory-motor systems. Scientific American, 213, 84–94.