32 observers judged the size of a letter, either an “A” or an “S,” which was surrounded by a circle. Both letters were overestimated, but larger surrounding circles reduced the illusion. Decreasing the lightness contrast of the surrounding circle relative to the central letter diminished the illusion. The results suggest that, like the Delboeuf illusion, these circumscribed letters illusions are produced by interactions among size-coding neurons.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrignerW. L. (1977) A mathematical model for assimilation and contrast in the perception of extent. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45, 103–118.
2.
BrignerW. L.KauffmanI. M. (1974) A correlate to Mach bands in the perception of extent. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 38, 919–932.
3.
CorenS. (1999) Relative contribution of lateral inhibition to the Delboeuf and Wundt-Hering illusions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 771–784.
4.
CorenS.GirgusJ. S. (1978) Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
CrovitzH. F. (1976) Perceived length and the Craik-O'Brien illusion. Vision Research, 16, 435.
6.
GirgusJ. S.CorenS. (1982) Assimilation and contrast illusions: Differences in plasticity. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 555–561.
7.
GirgusJ. S.CorenS.AgdernM. (1972) The interrelationship between the Ebbinghaus and Delboeuf illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 95, 453–455.
8.
IkedaH.ObanaiT. (1955) Studies in figural aftereffects: IV. The contrast-confluence illusion of concentric circles and the figural aftereffect. Japanese Psychological Research, 2, 17–23.
9.
JaegerT. (1999) Assimilation and contrast in geometrical illusions: A theoretical analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89, 249–261.
10.
JaegerT. (2007) Circumscribed shapes are enlarged: Is this a variation of the Delboeuf Illusion?Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104, 1116–1118.
11.
JaegerT.LordenR. (1980) Delboeuf illusions: Contour or size detector interactions?Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 376–378.
12.
KeatsJ. A. (1964) An application of the method of paired comparisons to the study of the Delboeuf illusion. Australian Journal of Psychology, 16, 169–174.
13.
LordenR.AtkesonB. M.PollackR. H. (1979) Differences in the magnitude of the Delboeuf illusion and Usnadze effect during adulthood. Journal of Gerontology, 34, 229–233.
14.
NicolasS. (1995) Joseph Delboeuf on visual illusions: A historical sketch. American Journal of Psychology, 108, 563–574.
15.
OyamaT. (1962) The effect of hue and brightness on the size-illusion of concentric circles. American Journal of Psychology, 75, 45–55.
16.
PiagetJ. (1969) The mechanisms of perception. New York: Basic Books.
17.
PollackR. H. (1964) The effects of fixation upon the apparent magnitude of bounded horizontal extent. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 177–192.
18.
SantostefanoS. (1963) A developmental study of the Delboeuf illusion. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 17, 23–29.
19.
SjostromK.PollackR. H. (1972) The role of lightness contrast in determining the magnitude of the Delboeuf illusion: A rejoinder to Weintraub and Cooper. Developmental Psychology, 6, 198–200.
20.
WeintraubD. J. (1979) Ebbinghaus illusion: Context, contour, and age influence the judged size of a circle amidst circles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 353–364.
21.
WeintraubD. J.CooperL. A. (1972) Coming of age with the Delboeuf illusion: Brightness contrast, cognition, and perceptual development. Developmental Psychology, 6, 187–197.
22.
WeintraubD. J.SchneckM. K. (1986) Fragments of Delbeouf and Ebbinghaus illusions: Contour/context explorations of misjudged circle size. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 147–158.
23.
WeintraubD. J.WilsonB. A.GreeneR. D.PalmquistM. J. (1969) Delboeuf illusion: Displacement versus diameter, arc deletions, and brightness contrast. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 505–511.