This study assessed small hand-closure movements as a potential response for microswitch activation with two participants with profound multiple disabilities of 5.2 and 20.6 yr. of age. The microswitch consisted of a two-membrane thin pad fixed to the palm of the hand and a control system. The outer membrane (the one facing the fingers) was a touch-sensitive layer; the inner membrane was activated if the participant applied a pressure of over 20 gm. The activation of either membrane triggered an electronic control system, which in turn activated one or more preferred stimuli for 6 sec. except in baseline phases. Each participant received an ABAB sequence, in which A represented baseline and B intervention phases, and a 1-mo. postintervention check. Analysis showed both participants increased their responding during the intervention phases and maintained that responding at the postintervention check. Implications of the findings are discussed.
CrawfordM. R.SchusterJ. W. (1993) Using microswitches to teach toy use. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 5, 349–368.
3.
FelceD.PerryJ. (1995) Quality of life: Its definition and measurement. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16, 51–74.
4.
HolburnS.NguyenD.VietzeP. M. (2004) Computer-assisted learning for adults with profound multiple disabilities. Behavioral Interventions, 19, 25–37.
5.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005) The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
6.
KazdinA. E. (2001) Behavior modification in applied settings. (6th ed.) New York: Wadsworth.
7.
KennedyK. (2005) Single case designs for educational research.New York: Allyn & Bacon.
8.
LancioniG. E.AbelsJ.WilmsE. H.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.GroenewegJ. (2003) Microswitch responding and awareness of contingency in persons with profound multiple disabilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96, 835–838.
9.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.OlivaD.CoppaM. M.MontironiG. (2005) A new microswitch to enable a boy with minimal motor behavior to control environmental stimulation with eye blinks. Behavioral Interventions, 20, 147–153.
10.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.SigafoosJ.DiddenR.OlivaD.MontironiG. (2006) Persons with multiple disabilities and minimal motor behavior using small forehead movements and new microswitch technology to control environmental stimuli. Manuscript submitted for publication.
11.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.SigafoosJ.OlivaD.BaccaniS.BoscoA.StasollaF. (2004) Techonological aids to promote basic developmental achievements by children with multiple disabilities: Evaluation of two cases. Cognitive Processing, 5, 232–238.
12.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.SigafoosJ.TotaA.AntonucciM.OlivaD. (2006) Children with multiple disabilities and minimal motor behavior using chin movements to operate microswitches to obtain environmental stimulation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 290–298.
13.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.OlivaD. (2005) Microswitch programs for persons with multiple disabilities: An overview of the responses adopted for microswitch activation. Cognitive Processing, 6, 177–188.
14.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.SigafoosJ.DiddenR.OlivaD.SeveriniL. (2007) Fostering adaptive responses and head control in students with multiple disabilities through a microswitch-based program: Follow-up assessment and program revision. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 187–196.
15.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.SigafoosJ.OlivaD.CostantiniA.GattoS.MarinelliV.PutzoluA. (2006) An optic microswitch for an eyelid response to foster environmental control in children with minimal motor behaviour. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 9, 53–56.
16.
LenkerJ. A.PaquetV. L. (2004) A new conceptual model for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assistive Technology, 16, 1–10.
17.
MechlingL. C. (2006) Comparison of the effects of three approaches on the frequency of stimulus activations, via a single switch, by students with profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 40, 94–102.
18.
MurphyK. M.SaundersM. D.SaundersR. R.OlswangL. B. (2004) Effects of ambient stimuli on measures of behavioral state and microswitch use in adults with profound multiple impairments. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 25, 355–370.
19.
O'BrienY.GlennS.CunninghamC. (1994) Contingency awareness in infants and children with severe and profound learning disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 41, 231–243.
20.
RichardsS. B.TaylorR. L.RamasamyR.RichardsR. Y. (1999) Single subject research: Applications in educational and clinical settings.New York: Wadsworth.
21.
SchalockR. L.VerdugoM. A.JenaroC.WangM.WehmeyerM.JanchengX.LachapelleY. (2005) Cross-cultural study of quality of life indicators. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 110, 298–311.
22.
SchererM. J.SaxC.VanbiervlietA.CushmanL. A.SchererJ. V. (2005) Predictors of assistive technology use: The importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27, 1321–1331.
23.
SiegelS.CastellanN. J. (1988) Nonparametric statistics. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
24.
WehmeyerM. L.SchwartzM. (1998) The relationship between self-determination, quality of life, and life satisfaction for adults with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 3–12.
25.
ZekovicB.RenwickR. (2003) Quality of life for children and adolescents with developmental disabilities: Review of conceptual and methodological issues relevant to public policy. Disability and Society, 18, 19–34.
