Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The nature of the relationship between self-controlled conditions and the participant's perception of when and how to use a physical assistance device while practicing a balancing task was examined. Participants in the Self-control group (n = 9) were allowed to decide when to use a balance pole while performing the task, while the Yoked group (n = 9) had no choice regarding pole usage. The Self-control group had immediate performance benefits that persisted on a delayed retention task. Questionnaire results indicated that the Self-control group predominately used the balance pole when attempting a new performance strategy, while the Yoked group reported they would have preferred use of the pole when attempting a new strategy. Results lend support to the assertion that self-controlled conditions facilitate learning because participants can make decisions regarding assistance based on self-generated performance strategy—as relating to their perception of successful movement execution—to a greater extent than under externally controlled conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bandura

(1993) Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148.

Boekaerts

(1996) Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition and motivation. European Psychologist, 1, 100–112.

Chiviacowsky

Wulf

(2002) Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 408–415.

Chiviacowsky

Wulf

(2005) Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 42–48.

Ferrari

(1996) Observing the observers: Self-regulation in the observational learning of motor skills. Developmental Review, 16, 203–240.

Janelle

C. M.

Barba

D. A.

Frehlich

S. G.

Tennant

L. K.

Cauraugh

J. H.

(1997) Maximizing performance effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 269–279.

Janelle

C. M.

Kim

Singer

R. N.

(1995) Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 627–634.

Johnson-Kramer

(1992) Performance and learning of a dynamic balance task by visually impaired children. Clinical Kinesiology, 45, 3–5.

Juras

(2001) The influence of different aspects of coordination on the motor learning of a balancing task on a stabilometer. Bulletin of International Council of Sport Science and Physical Education, 31, 38–39.

10.

Kirschenbaum

D. S.

(1984) Self-regulation of sport psychology: Nurturing an emerging symbiosis. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 159–183.

11.

Kitsantas

Zimmerman

B. J.

(2002) Comparing self-regulatory processes among novice, non-expert, and expert volleyball players: A microanalytic study. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14, 91–105.

12.

McCombs

M. L.

(1989) Self-regulated learning and achievement: A phenomenological view. In Zimmerman

B. J.

Schunk

D. H.

(Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement theory, research, and practice: Progress in cognitive development research. New York: Springer-Verlag. Pp. 51–82.

13.

Newell

(1991) Motor skill acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 213–237.

14.

Shea

C. H.

Wulf

(1999) Enhancing motor learning through external-focus instructions and feedback. Human Movement Science, 18, 553–571.

15.

Shea

C. H.

Wulf

Whitacre

C. A.

(1999) Enhancing training efficiency and effectiveness through the use of dyad training. Journal of Motor Behavior, 31, 119–125.

16.

Watkins

(1984) Students' perceptions of factors influencing tertiary learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 3, 33–50.

17.

Winne

P. H.

(1995) Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173–187.

18.

Winstein

C. J.

Schmidt

R. A.

(1990) Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 677–691.

19.

Wulf

(1998) Instructions for motor learning: Differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 169–179.

20.

Wulf

(2001) Attention and motor performance: Preferences for and advantages of an external focus. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 335–344.

21.

Wulf

Clauss

Shea

C. H.

Whitacre

(2001) Benefits of self-control in dyad practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 299–303.

22.

Wulf

Raupach

Pfeiffer

(2005) Self-controlled observational practice enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 107–111.

23.

Wulf

Schmidt

R. A.

(1989) The learning of generalized motor programs: Reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 748–757.

24.

Wulf

Toole

(1999) Physical assistance devices in complex motor skill learning: Benefits of a self-controlled practice schedule. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70, 265–272.

Self-Controlled Use of a Perceived Physical Assistance Device during a Balancing Task

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References