Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2007-2
Projective Drawings for Assessing Stress among Subjects with Medical Symptoms Compatible with Sick Building Syndrome,and Validation of a Modified Version of the Stress Load Index from the Drawing Personality Profile: A Pilot Study
It was hypothesized that subjects with medical symptoms would show more signs of stress in projective drawings. A Stress Load Index, including five signs of stress in drawings, was evaluated. A questionnaire with an instruction to draw “a person in the rain” was sent to a cohort of 195 subjects, and the drawings were analysed blindly for eight stress items. Men had a higher index than women (p < .05) and drew clouds more often (p < .05). Drawing of clouds was associated with headache (adjOR = 4.28; 95% CI 1.75; 11.68). Drawing of puddles was associated with ocular symptoms (adjOR = 3.22; 95% CI 1.38, 7.50), facial dermal symptoms (adjOR = 2.94; 95% CI 1.28, 6.81), and tiredness (adjOR = 2.44; 95% CI 1.05, 5.67). Drawing of long rain strokes was associated with nasal symptoms (adjOR = 2.28; 95% CI 1.05, 2.06) and headache (adjOR = 3.20; 95% CI 1.28, 8.05). Age and stress load were predictors of sick building syndrome symptoms (p < .05). In conclusion, a nonverbal projective drawing test detected sex differences which represent directions opposite to those with verbal methods. These need empirical assessment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkimenkoV. V.AndersenI.LebowitzM. D.LindvallT. (1986) The “sick” building syndrome. In BerglundB.BerglundU.LindvallT.SundellJ. (Eds.), Indoor air. Vol. 6. Stockholm: Swedish Council for Building Research D, 13. Pp. 87–97.
2.
ApterA.BrackerA.HodgsonM.SidmanJ.LeungW. Y. (1994) Epidemiology of the sick building syndrome. Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 94, 277–288.
3.
BjörnssonE.JansonC.NorbäckD.BomanG. (1998) Symptoms related to the sick building syndrome in a general population sample: Associations with atopy, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and anxiety. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Tung Disease, 2, 1023–1028.
4.
BornsteinR. F.ManningK. A.KrukonisA. B.RossnerS. C.MastrosimoneC. C. (1993) Sex differences in dependency: A comparison of objective and projective measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 169–181.
5.
BuckJ. N. (1948) The House-Tree-Person technique: Qualitative and quantitative scoring manual. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 4, 317–396.
6.
CarneyS. M. (1992) Draw a person in the rain: A comparison of levels of stress and depression among adolescents. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International. Pp. 1–90.
7.
CrawfordJ. O.BolasS. M. (1996) Sick building syndrome, work factors and occupational stress. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 22, 243–250.
8.
Editorial. (1991) Sick building syndrome. The Lancet, 338, Dec. 14.
9.
EyalC.LindgrenH. C. (1997) The House-Tree-Person test as a measure of intelligence and creativity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 359–362.
10.
HammerE. F. (1958) The clinical application of projective drawings. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
11.
HodgsonM. (1995) The sick-building syndrome. Occupational Medicine: State of Art Reviews, 10, 167–175.
12.
JaakkolaJ. J. K.HeinonenO. P.SeppänenO. (1989) Sick building syndrome, sensation of dryness and thermal comfort in relation to room temperature in an office building: Need for individual control of temperature. Environment International, 15, 163–168.
13.
JoinerT. E.Jr.SchmidtN. B.LerewD. R.CookJ. H.GencozT.GfncozF. (2000) Differential roles of depressive and anxious symptoms and gender in defensiveness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 200–211.
14.
KochC. (1952) The Tree Test. Bern, Switz.: Huber.
15.
KreissK. (1989) The epidemiology of building-related complaints and illness. In CoreJ. E.HodgsonM. J. (Eds.), Occupational medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Henley & Belfus. Pp. 575–592.
16.
LetzG. A. (1990) Sick building syndrome: Acute illness among office workers—the role of building ventilation, airborne contaminants and work stress. Allergy Proceedings, 11, 109–116.
17.
MachoverK. (1949) Personality projection in the drawings of the human figure. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
18.
MacintyreS.FordG.HuntK. (1999) Do women ‘over-report’ morbidity? Men's and women's responses to structured prompting on a standard question on long standing illness. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 89–98.
19.
MendellM. J. (1993) Non-specific symptoms in office workers: A review and summary of the epidemiological literature. Indoor Air, 3, 227–236.
20.
MerrillL. L. (1994) Draw-a-Person test as a measure of anxiety in the workplace. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 11–15.
21.
NeunerR.SeidelH. J. (2006) Adaptation of office workers to a new building—impaired well-being as part of the sick-building-syndrome. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 209, 367–375.
22.
NorbäckD.EdlingC. (1991) Environmental, occupational, and personal factors related to the prevalence of sick building syndrome in the general population. British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 48, 451–468.
23.
NorbäckD.MichelI.WidströmJ. (1990) Indoor air quality and personal factors related to the sick building syndrome. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 16, 121–128.
24.
NorbäckD.WieslanderG.BjörnssonE.JansonC.BomanG. (1996) Eye irritation, nasal congestion, and facial skin itching in relation to emissions from newly painted indoor surfaces. Indoor and Built Environment, 5, 270–279.
25.
O'NeillR. M.BornsteinR. F. (1990) Oral-dependence and gender: Factors in help-seeking response set and self-reported psychopathology in psychiatric inpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 28–40.
26.
RunesonR. (1998) The Drawing Personality Profile (DPP): An objective personality profile based on the H-T-P and the Person-in-the-Rain projective techniques: A preliminary report on the development of empirical indicators for exploring personality makeup. Projective Drawing, 3, 1.
27.
RunesonR.NorbäckD. (2005) Associations among sick building syndrome, psychosocial factors, and personality traits. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 747–759.
28.
RunesonR.NorbäckD.KlintebergB.EdlingC. (2004) The influence of personality, measured by the Karolinska Scales of Personality (KSP), on symptoms among subjects in suspected sick buildings. Indoor Air, 14, 394–404.
29.
RunesonR.NorbäckD.StattinH. (2003) Symptoms and sense of coherence—a follow-up study of personnel from workplace buildings with indoor air problems. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 76, 29–38.
30.
SkovP.ValbjørnO.PedersenB. V., & The Danish Indoor Climate Study Croup. (1989) Influence of personal characteristics, job-related factors and psychosocial factors on the sick building syndrome. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 15, 286–295.
31.
StenbergB.Hansson MildK.SandströmM.SundellJ.WallS. (1993) A prevalence study of the sick building syndrome (SBS) and facial skin symptoms in office workers. Indoor Air, 3, 71–81.
32.
StenbergB.WallS. (1995) Why do women report ‘sick building symptoms’ more often than men?Social Science and Medicine, 40, 491–502.
33.
WorchelF. T.AaronI. L.YatesD. F. (1990) Gender bias on the Thematic Apperception Test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 593–602.
