Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Cultivation studies have found evidence that heavy television viewers adopt a world view congruent with how the world is portrayed in fictional television programs. An explanation is that viewers may remember fictional TV stories as realistic stories or news (fiction-to-news confusion). Until now, fiction-to-news confusion was found only if at least a week evolved between watching TV and asking viewers what was remembered. The present study conducted with a purposive sample of students and employees of a college in The Netherlands (N = 96; M age = 28.6 yr., SD= 10.9) indicates that fiction-to-news confusions can also occur almost immediately after watching. In addition, whereas earlier research suggests that fiction-to-news confusions are associated with heavy viewing, i.e., more confusion when more hours per day are spent on TV viewing in leisure time, and faulty memory, the present study more specifically suggests that participants make many fiction-to-news confusions when they are exposed to relatively many fictional TV fragments that contain threatening, violent events.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andsager

J. L.

Austin

E. W.

Pinkleton

B. E.

(2002) Gender as a variable in interpretation of alcohol-related messages. Communication Research, 29, 246–269.

Austin

E. W.

Meili

H. K.

(1994) Effects of interpretations of televised alcohol portrayals on children's alcohol beliefs. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39, 417–435.

Bellamy

R. V.

Walker

J. R.

(1996) Television and the remote control: Grazing on a vast wasteland. New York: Guilford.

Cohen

(2001) Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4, 245–264.

Fujioka

(2005) Emotional TV viewing and minority audience: How Mexican Americans process and evaluate TV news about in-group members. Communication Research, 32, 566–593.

Gerbner

Gross

(1976) Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26, 173–199.

Gerbner

Gross

Eleey

M. F.

Jackson-Beeck

Jeffries-Fox

Signorielli

(1977) Television profile No. 8: The highlights. Journal of Communication, 27, 171–180.

Greene

R. L.

(1986) A common basis for recency effects in immediate and delayed recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 413–418.

Hoffner

C. A.

(1996) Children's wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 389–402.

10.

Hoffner

C. A.

Levine

K. J.

(2005) Enjoyment of mediated fright and violence: A meta-analysis. Media Psychology, 7, 207–237.

11.

Kumkale

G. T.

Albarracin

(2004) The sleeper effect in persuasion: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 143–172.

12.

Lang

Shin

Bradley

S. D.

Wang

Lee

Potter

(2005) Wait! Don't turn that dial! More excitement to come! The effects of story length and production pacing in local television news on channel changing behavior and information processing in a free choice environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 3–22.

13.

Mares

M. L.

(1996) The role of source confusions in television's cultivation of social reality judgments. Human Communication Research, 23, 278–297.

14.

Morgan

Shanahan

(1997) Two decades of cultivation research: An appraisal and meta-analysis. Communication Yearbook, 20, 1–45.

15.

Newhagen

J. E.

Reeves

(1992) The evening's bad news: Effects of compelling negative television news images on memory. Journal of Communication, 42, 25–41.

16.

Pratkanis

A. R.

Greenwald

A. G.

Leippe

M. R.

Baumgardner

M. H.

(1988) In search of reliable persuasion effects: III. The sleeper effect is dead. Long live the sleeper effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 203–218.

17.

Shapiro

M. A.

Lang

(1991) Making television reality: Unconscious processes in the construction of social reality. Communication Research, 18, 3–24.

18.

Shoemaker

P. J.

(1996) Hardwired for news: Using biological and cultural evolution to explain the surveillance function. Journal of Communication, 46, 32–47.

19.

Shrum

L. J.

O'Guinn

T. C.

(1993) Processes and effects in the construction of social reality: Construct accessibility as an explanatory variable. Communication Research, 20, 436–471.

20.

Tversky

Kahneman

(1973) Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.

21.

Wilson

T. D.

Brekke

(1994) Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 117–142.

Source Confusion as an Explanation of Cultivation: A Test of the Mechanisms Underlying Confusion of Fiction with Reality on Television

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References