The literature reports that focused attention alters perceived length of lines. Some tests of this attentional effect require that subjects compare line lengths. This note shows that conceptual confusions inherent in this comparison make the tests invalid.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CorenS., & GirgusJ. S. (1972) Differentiation and decrement in the Müller-Lyer illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 466, 470.
2.
DiasR. N., & FukusimaS. S. (2004) Efeitos da atenção na perçepção visual de tamanho. In Programa e Resumos da XIX Reunião Anual da FeSBE, Aguas de Lindóia, SP, Brazil, August 25-28, 2004. (Summary 01.04.025)
3.
DiasR. N., & FukusimaS. S. (2005) Assimetria lateral nas comparações de tamanhos percebidos em condições visuais de atenção. In Programa e Resumos da XX Reunião Anual da FeSBE, Aguas de Lindóia, SP, Brazil, August 24-27, 2005. (Summary 04.003)
4.
FraisseP.EhrlichS., & VurpillotE. (1956) Études de la centration perceptive par la méthode tachistoscopique. Archives de Psychologie, 35, 193–214.
5.
FukusimaS. S.DiasR. N., & CavaJ. M. (2004) Efeito da atenção na percepção visual de tamanho. In Resumos de Comunicação Científica da XXXIV Reunião da Sociedade Brasileira de Psicología, Riheirão Preto, SP, Brazil, October 26-29, 2004. (Symposium 14)
6.
GuilfordJ. P. (1954) Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
GuilfordJ. P., & ParkD. G. (1931) The effect of interpolated weights upon comparative judgment. American Journal of Psychology, 43, 589–599.
8.
HebbD. O., & FoordE. N. (1945) Errors of visual recognition and the nature of the trace. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 335–348.
9.
JordanK., & EnglishP. W. (1989) Simultaneous sampling and length contrast. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 546–554.
10.
KleinR. M.WylieG., & BriandK. (1996) How does covert visual orienting affect absolute judgments of size and duration?Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 1, 40.
11.
KöhlerW. (1923) Zur Theorie des Sukzessiwergleichs und Zeitfehler. Psychologische Forschung, 4, 115–175.
12.
MasinS. C. (1995) Probabilistic inferences, discrimination, and stimulus interference in comparative judgment. Psychological Research, 58, 10–18.
13.
MasinS. C. (1998) Gamma movement and time error. In GrondinS. & LacoutureY. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics. Québec, Canada: Society. Pp. 278–283.
14.
MasinS. C. (2003) Test of the effect of attention on judged length of a line. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96, 599–606.
15.
MasinS. C., & AgostiniA. (1991) Attentional scanning and space errors. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 285–289.
16.
McKennaF. P. (1984) Assimilation and contrast in perceptual judgement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 531–548.
17.
PiagetJ.Vinh-Bang, & MatalonB. (1958) Note on the law of the temporal maximum of some optico-geometrical illusions. American Journal of Psychology, 71, 277–282.
18.
PrattC. C. (1933) The time error in psychophysical judgments. American Journal of Psychology, 45, 292–297.
19.
PrinzmetalW. A., & WilsonA. (1997) The effect of attention on phenomenal length. Perception, 26, 193–205.
20.
Reuter-LorenzP. A.KinsbourneM., & MoscovitchM. (1990) Hemispherical control of spatial attention. Brain and Cognition, 12, 240–266.
21.
TsalY.ShalevL., & ZakayD. (2005) The lengthening effect revisited: a reply to Prinzmetal and Wilson (1997) and Masin (1999). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 185–190.
