This study evaluated the extent to which two microswitches used as interfaces would enable a man with multiple disabilities and limited motor behavior to operate an electric door opener at the entrance of the day center that he attended. Analysis showed the man (a) learned to use the two microswitches, (b) preferred the microswitch placed at his wheelchair's footrest (which also allowed more effective responding) over the microswitch placed at his wheelchair's armrest, and (c) maintained his positive performance at the 1- and 2-mo. postintervention checks. The results were discussed from a technical and practical standpoint and in terms of implications for the quality of life of persons with disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArthurM. (2004) Patterns amongst behavior states, sociocommunicative, and activity variables in educational programs for students with profound multiple disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 16, 125–149.
2.
CavalierA. R., & BrownC. C. (1998) From passivity to participation: the transformational possibilities of speech-recognition technology. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30, 60–65.
3.
CrawfordM. R., & SchusterJ. W. (1993) Using microswitches to teach toy use. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 5, 349–368.
4.
GutowskiS. J. (1996) Response acquisition for music or beverages in adults with profound multiple handicaps. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 8, 221–231.
5.
HolburnS.NguyenD., & VietzeP. M. (2004) Computer-assisted learning for adults with profound multiple disabilities. Behavioral Interventions, 19, 25–37.
6.
KazdinA. E. (2001) Behavior modification in applied settings. (6th ed.) New York: Wadsworth.
7.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F., & BasiliG. (2001) Use of microswitches and speech output systems with people with severe/profound intellectual or multiple disabilities: a literature review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22, 21–40.
8.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.CampodonicoF., & MantiniM. (1998) Mobility versus sedentariness in task arrangements for people with multiple disabilities: an assessment of preferences. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 19, 465–475.
9.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.CampodonicoF.MarzianiM., & OlivaD. (2004) A microswitch program to foster simple foot and leg movements in adult wheelchair users with multiple disabilities. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 33, 137–142.
10.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.OlivaD., & BasiliG. (2005) An overview of research on increasing indices of happiness of people with severe/profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27, 83–93.
11.
MasseyN. G., & WheelerJ. J. (2000) Acquisition and generalization of activity schedules and their effects on task engagement in a young child with autism in an inclusive preschool classroom. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 326–335.
12.
ParetteH. P. (1997) Assistive technology devices and services. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 32, 267–280.
13.
ParetteP., & SchererM. (2004) Assistive technology use and stigma. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39, 217–226.
14.
RichardsS. B.TaylorR. L.RamasamyR., & RichardsR. Y. (1999) Single subject research: applications in educational and clinical settings. New York: Wadsworth.
15.
SchalockR. L.BrownI.BrownR.CumminsR. A.FelceD.MatikkaL.KeithK. D., & ParmenterT. (2002) Conceptualization, measurement, and application of quality of life for persons with intellectual disabilities: reports of an international panel of experts. Mental Retardation, 40, 457–470.
16.
SiegelS., & CastellanN. J. (1988) Nonparametric statistics. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
VlaaskampC.de GeeterK. I.HuijsmansL. M., & SmitI. H. (2003) Passive activities: the effectiveness of multisensory environments on the level of activity of individuals with profound multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16, 135143.
18.
WackerD. P.BergW. K.HardingJ. W.BarrettoA.RankinB., & GanzerJ. (2005) Treatment effectiveness, stimulus generalization, and acceptability to parents of functional communication training. Educational Psychology, 25, 233–256.
19.
WehmeyerM. L.SmithS. J.PalmerS. B.DaviesD. K., & StockS. E. (2004) Technology use and people with mental retardation. In GliddenL. (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation. Vol. 29. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press. Pp. 291–337.
