Encoding Richness of Self-Generated Elaboration and Spacing Effects on Incidental Memory

Abstract

The present study investigated encoding variability in self-generated elaboration on incidental memory as a function of the type of presentation which was either massed or spaced. The subjects generated different answers to a “why” question for the first and the second presentations of a target sentence in a self-generated elaboration condition. In an experimenter-provided elaboration condition they then rated the appropriateness of the different answers provided by the experimenter for the first and second presentations. This procedure was followed by two free recall tests, one of which was immediate and the other delayed. A self-generated elaboration effect was observed in both the spaced and the massed presentations. These results indicated that the self-generated elaboration effect was facilitated, even in the massed presentation because the different answers to the first and the second presentations led to a richer encoding of each target.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J. R.

, & Reder

L. M.

(1979) An elaborative processing explanation of depth of processing. In Cermak

L. S.

& Craik

F. I. M.

(Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 385–403.

Gartman

I. M.

, & Johnson

N. F.

(1972) Massed versus distributed repetition of homographs: a test of the differential encoding hypothesis. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 801–808.

Glenberg

A. M.

(1977) Influences of retrieval processes on the spacing effect in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 282–294.

Glenberg

A. M.

, & Lehman

T. S.

(1980) Spacing repetitions over 1 week. Memory & Cognition, 8, 528–538.

Kitao

(2002) [A review of research on the spacing effect in memory]. [Japanese Psychological Review], 45, 164–179. [English abstract]

Klein

, & Saltz

(1976) Specifying the mechanisms in a levels-of-processing approach to memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 671–679.

Madigan

S. A.

(1969) Intraserial repetition and coding processes in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 828–835.

Martin

(1968) Stimulus meaningfulness and paired-associate transfer: an encoding variability hypothesis. Psychological Review, 75, 421–441.

Pressley

McDaniel

M. A.

Turnure

J. E.

Wood

, & Ahmad

(1987) Generation and precision of elaboration: effects of intentional and incidental learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 291–300.

10.

Pressley

Symons

McDaniel

M. A.

Snyder

B. L.

, & Turnure

J. E.

(1988) Elaborative interrogation facilitates acquisition of confusing facts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 268–278.

11.

Stein

B. S.

, & Bransford

J. D.

(1979) Constraints on effective elaboration: effects of precision and subject generation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 769–777.

12.

Toyota

(1990) [Effect of elaboration on retrieval of words in incidental memory]. [The Japanese Journal of Psychology], 61, 119–122. [English abstract]

13.

Toyota

(1993) [Effect of information generation on incidental memory of words]. [The Japanese Journal of Psychology], 64, 55–58. [English abstract]

14.

Toyota

(1998) [A review of the effect of self-generated elaboration on memory]. [Japanese Psychological Review], 41, 257–274. [English abstract]

15.

Toyota

, & Kikuchi

(2004) Self-generated elaboration and spacing effects on incidental memory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 99, 1193–1200.

16.

Wood

Pressley

, & Winne

P. H.

(1990) Elaborative interrogation effects on children's learning of factual content. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 741–748.