The purpose was to evaluate the effect of an infusion curriculum model on attitudes of physical education majors toward teaching students with disabilities. 91 undergraduate students (61 men, 30 women) matriculating through the core curriculum of physical education teachers were exposed to the infusion curriculum as part of each course during one academic year. Attitudes were assessed pre- (Fall) and posttest (Spring) on the Physical Educator's Attitude Toward Teaching Individuals with Disabilities III. Analysis indicated a significant positive change in attitudes toward teaching students with disabilities. Findings suggest, when exposed to issues of disability by infusion into course content, these students self-reported they would have increased confidence in teaching and an appreciation when teaching students with disabilities. An independent validation of this change would be valuable.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101–336, ş 2, 104 Stat. 328 (1991).
2.
BarretteG. T.Holland FiorentinoL.KowalskiE. M. (1993) Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE): Innovation through infusion and integration. Physical Educator, 50(2), 69–76.
3.
BlockM.ZemanR. (1996) Including students with disabilities in regular physical education: Effects on nondisabled children. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 13, 38–49.
4.
BlockM. E.RizzoT. (1995) Attitudes and attributes of physical educators associated with teaching individuals with severe and profound disabilities. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20, 80–87.
5.
DePauwK. P. (2000) Social-cultural context of disability: Implications for scientific inquiry and professional preparation. Quest, 52, 358–368.
6.
DePauwK. P.Doll-TepperG. M. (2000) Toward progressive inclusion and acceptance: Myth or reality? The inclusion debate and bandwagon discourse. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17, 135–143.
7.
DePauwK. P.Goc KarpG. (1990) Attitudes of selected college students toward including disabled individuals in integrated settings. In Doll-TepperG.DahmsC.DollB.von SelzmanH. (Eds.), Adapted physical activity. Berlin: Springer Verlag. Pp. 149–158.
8.
DePauwK. P.Goc KarpG. (1994) Integrating knowledge of disability throughout the physical education curriculum: An infusion approach. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 1–13.
9.
DownsP.WilliamsT. (1994) Student attitudes toward integration of people with disabilities in activity settings: A European comparison. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 32–43.
10.
Folsom-MeekS. L.KampfH.NearingR. J.RizzoT. L. (1998) Perceived competence and contact with individuals with disabilities. In North American Federation of Adapted Physical Activity Symposium. Minneapolis, MN: NAFAPA. Pp. 20–21.
11.
Folsom-MeekS. L.RizzoT. L. (2002) Validating the Physical Educator's Attitude Toward Teaching Individuals with Disabilities III (PEATID III) survey for future professionals. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 141–154.
12.
GoodwinD. L. (2001) The meaning of help in PE: Perceptions of students with physical disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 18, 289–303.
13.
Heikinaro-JohanssonP.SherrillC. (1994) Integrating children with special needs in physical education: A school district assessment model from Finland. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 44–56.
14.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105–17, ş 5, 198 Stat. 212 (1998).
15.
JansmaP.ShultzB. (1982) Validation and use of a mainstreaming attitude inventory with physical educators. American Corrective Therapy Journal, 36, 150–158.
16.
KowalskiE. (1995) The infusion approach to teacher development. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 66(4), 49–57.
17.
KowalskiE. M.RizzoT. L. (1996) Factors influencing preservice student attitudes toward individuals with disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 13, 180–196.
LeporeM.KowalskiE. (1992) Infusion: A new look at an old idea. Paper presented at the North American Federation of Adapted Physical Activity Conference. Montreal, Canada, October.
20.
MarstonR.LeslieD. (1983) Teacher perceptions from mainstreamed vs. nonmainstreamed teaching environments. The Physical Educator, 40, 8–15.
21.
MurataN. M.JansmaP. (1997) Influence of support personnel on students with and without disabilities in general physical education. Clinical Kinesiology, 51(2), 37–46.
RarickG. L.BeuterA. C. (1985) The effect of mainstreaming on the performance of mentally retarded and nonhandicapped students. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 2, 277–282.
24.
ReidG. (2000) Future directions of inquiry in adapted physical activity. Quest, 52, 369–381.
25.
RizzoT. L. (1985) Attributes related to teachers' attitudes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 739–742.
26.
RizzoT. L. (1993) Physical Educator's Attitude Toward Teaching Individuals with Disabilities-III. (Unpublished survey) (Available from the author, Department of Kinesiology, California State University, San Bernardino, CA 92407–2397)
27.
RizzoT. L.BroadheadG. D.KowalskiE. (1997) Changing kinesiology and physical education by infusing information about individuals with disabilities. Quest, 49, 229–237.
28.
RizzoT. L.DavisW. E. (1991) From the back of the physical education bus: The functional exclusion of adapted physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 62(6), 53–55.
29.
RizzoT. L.KirkendallD. R. (1995) Teaching students with mild disabilities: What affects attitudes of future physical educators?Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 12, 205–216.
30.
RizzoT. L.VispoelW. P. (1991) Physical educator's attributes and attitudes toward teaching students with handicaps. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 8, 4–11.
31.
RizzoT. L.VispoelW. P. (1992) Changing attitudes about teaching students with handicaps. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 9, 54–63.
32.
RizzoT. L.WrightR. G. (1988) Selected attributes related to physical educator's attitudes toward teaching students with handicaps. Mental Retardation, 26, 307–309.
33.
RoweJ.StuttsR. M. (1987) Effects of practica type, experience and gender on attitudes of undergraduate physical education majors toward disabled persons. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 4, 268–277.
34.
Schmidt-GötzE.Doll-TepperG.LienertC. (1994) Attitudes of university students and teachers towards integrating students with disabilities in regular physical education classes. Physical Education Review, 17, 43–57.
35.
ShaverJ.CurtisC.JesunathadasJ.StrongC. (1987) The modifications of attitudes toward persons with handicaps: A comprehensive integrative review of research. (Final report to the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services, Project No. 023Ch50160, Grant No. 6008530210) Logan, UT: Utah State Univer., Bureau of Research Service.
StewartC. (1991) Labels and the attitudes of undergraduate physical education students toward disabled individuals. The Physical Educator, 48(3), 142–145.
38.
VoglerE. W.KorandaP.RomanceT. (2000) Including a child with severe cerebral palsy in physical education: A case study. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17, 161–175.
39.
ZanandreaM.RizzoT. (1998) Attitudes of undergraduate physical education majors in Brazil toward teaching students with disabilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 699–700.
