The primary purpose of this research was to examine the validity of the hierarchical physical self-perceptions model developed by Fox and Corbin (1989) within a population of physically disabled individuals. The secondary purpose was to compare the physical self-perceptions of those who were physically active and physically inactive. 97 adults with physical disabilities completed a self-esteem scale and the Physical Self-perception Profile, Japanese short version to assess General Physical Self-worth and its subdomains of Perceived Sports Competence, Physical Condition, Attractive Body, and Physical Strength. Path analysis showed adequate fit of the data to the hierarchical physical self-perception model. In general, physical self-perceptions were rated more favorably by physically active participants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FoxK. R. (1990) The Physical Self-perception Profile manual. DeKalb, IL: Office for Health Promotion, Northern Illinois Univer.
2.
FoxK. R. (1998) Advances in the measurement of the physical self. In DudaJ. L. (Ed.), Advances in exercise and exercise psychology measurement. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology, Inc. Pp. 295–310.
3.
FoxK. R. (2000) The effects of exercise on self-perceptions and self-esteem. In BiddleS. J. H.FoxK. R.BoutcherS. H. (Eds.), Exercise and psychological well-being. London: Routledge. Pp. 88–117.
4.
FoxK. R.CorbinC. B. (1989) The Physical Self-perception Profile: development and preliminary validation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 408–430.
5.
HopperC. A. (1984) Socialization of wheelchair athletes. In SherrillC. (Ed.), The 1984 Olympic Scientific Congress proceedings. Vol. 9. Exercise and disabled. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Pp. 197–202.
6.
HoshinoI. (1970) [Psychology of affect and education (2)]. [Psychology of Child], 24, 1445–1477.
7.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
8.
McAuleyE.MihalkoS. L.BaneS. M. (1999) Exercise and self-esteem in middle-aged adults: multidimensional relationships and physical fitness and self-efficacy influences. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 20, 67–83.
9.
[Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare]. (Eds.) (2002) [White paper of health and welfare in 2002]. Tokyo: Gyosei.
10.
MinouchiY. (1999) [Development of the Physical Self-perception Profile, Japanese short version]. In [50th of Japanese Society of Physical Education proceedings]. P. 334.
11.
MizotaJ. (1999) [Methodology of rehabilitation]. In SuzurikawaS.HashimotoT.OkawaH. (Eds.), [Theory of rehabilitation]. Kyoto: Kinpodo. Pp. 43–46.
12.
MuraiJ. (1995) [Development of individuals with disability]. In MuraiJ.FujitaA. (Eds.), [Psychology of older adults and individuals with disability]. Kyoto: Mineruva Shobo. Pp. 131–139.
13.
OnoderaT. (1999) [Methodology of analysis using AMOS]. In YamamotoK.OnoderaT. (Eds.), [Analysis of structural equation modeling using AMOS]. Kyoto: Nakanishiya Syuppann. Pp. 23–47.
14.
PearlinL. I.SchoolerC. (1978) The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 2–21.
15.
RansdellL. B.DetlingN. J.TaylorA.ReelJ.ShultzB. (2004) Effects of home- and university-based programs on physical self-perception in mothers and daughters. Women and Health, 39, 63–81.
16.
RogersC. R. (1950) The significance of the self-regarding attitudes and perceptions. In ReymertM. L. (Ed.), Feeling and emotion: the Moosehart Symposium. New York: McGraw-Hill. Pp. 374–382.
17.
RosenbergM. (1965) Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univer. Press.
18.
SandsR. T.WettenhallR. S. (2000) Female wheelchair athletes and changes to body image. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 47, 413–426.
19.
SchmittN. (1996) Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350–353.
20.
ShavelsonR. J.HubnerJ. J.StantonG. C. (1976) Self-concept: validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.
21.
SonstroemR. J. (1997) Exercise and self-esteem. In MorganW. P. (Ed.), Exercise and mental health. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis. Pp. 128–143.
22.
TamS. (1998) Comparing the self-concepts of persons with and without physical disabilities. Journal of Psychology, 132, 78–86.
