Effects of Specific versus Variable Practice on the Retention and Transfer of a Continuous Motor Skill

Abstract

The effects of specific versus variable practice on retention and transfer was investigated. 30 participants were randomly assigned to one of three practice conditions. The variable speed group practiced on a pursuit rotor task at three different speeds (60, 45, 30 rpm) which were randomly distributed but equal in number for 30 10-sec. trials on Day 1. The Specific Practice group performed all 30 10-sec. trials at 45 rpm on Day 1. On Day 2, all groups performed 15 trials at the 45-rpm retention speed and 15 trials at the 75-rpm transfer speed. The Control group only performed on Day 2. Analysis showed the Specific Practice group had significantly higher scores on Day 1. On Day 2, the Specific Practice group had significantly higher retention scores and the Variable Practice group had higher transfer scores. Continuous motor skills might be practiced differently depending on the environmental context in which the skill may be used.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

J. A.

(1971) A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111–150.

Adams

J. A.

(1987) Historical review and appraisal of research on learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 41–47.

Brady

(1997) Contextual interference and teaching golf skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 347–350.

Christana

R. W.

Lambert

P. J.

Fischman

M. G.

(1982) Hand position as a variable determining the accuracy of aiming movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 341–348.

Coull

Tremblay

Elliott

(2001) Examining the specificity of practice hypothesis: is learning modality specific. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 345–355.

French

K. E.

Rink

J. E.

Werner

P. H.

(1990) Effects of contextual interference on the retention of three volleyball skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 179–314.

Goode

Magill

R. A.

(1986) Contextual interference on retention of three badminton serves. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 4, 308–314.

Hammerton

(1989) Tracking. In Holding

D. H.

(Ed.), Human skills. (2nd ed.) Chichester, Eng.: Wiley. Pp. 171–195.

Henry

F. M.

(1960) Increased response latency for complicated movements and a “memory drum” theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 31, 448–458.

10.

Jarus

Wughalter

E. H.

Gianutsos

J. G.

(1997) Effects of contextual interference and conditions of movement task on acquisition, retention, and transfer of motor skills by women. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 179–193.

11.

Lordahl

D. S.

Archer

E. J.

(1958) Transfer effects on a rotary pursuit task as a function of first task difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 421–426.

12.

Namikas

Archer

E. J.

(1960) Motor skill transfer as a function of intertask interval and pretask task difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 109–112.

13.

Proteau

Carnahan

(2001) What causes specificity of practice in a manual aiming movement: vision dominance or transformation errors? Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 226–235.

14.

Proteau

Tremblay

DeJaeger

(1998) Practice does not diminish the role of visual information in on-line control of a precision walking task: support for the specificity of practice hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 143–151.

15.

Schmidt

R. A.

(2003) Motor schema theory after 27 years: reflections and implications for a new theory. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 366–376.

16.

Schmidt

R. A.

Wrisberg

C. A.

(2000) Motor learning and performance: a problem based approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

17.

Shea

C. H.

Kohl

R. M.

(1990) Specificity and variability of practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 169–177.

18.

Sherwood

D. E.

Lee

T. D.

(2003) Schema theory: critical review and implications for the role of cognition in a new theory of motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 376–383.

19.

Stelmach

G. E.

(1973) Feedback: a determiner of forgetting in short-term memory. Acta Psychologica, 37, 333–339.

20.

Stelmach

G. E.

(1982) Motor control and motor learning: the closed-loop perspective. In Scott Kelso

J. A.

(Ed.), Human motor behavior: an introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 93–111.