A study investigated streakiness among professional golfers. Hole-to-hole scores within 747 tournaments from a randomly chosen group of 35 players on the 1997 PGA Tour were analyzed. Contingency analyses gave no evidence for streakiness. Players were just as likely to score par or better following an above par hole as to make a par or better following a par or better hole. These results are consistent with those found for individual players in baseball and basketball.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbrightS. C. (1993) A statistical analysis of hitting streaks in baseball. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 1175–1183.
2.
BaumeisterR. F.ShowersC. J. (1986) A review of paradoxical performance effects: choking under pressure in sports and mental tests. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 361–383.
3.
ClarkR. D.III. (2003a) An analysis of streaky performance on the LPGA Tour. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97, 365–370
4.
ClarkR. D.III. (2003b) Streakiness among professional golfers: fact or fiction?International Journal of Sport Psychology, 34, 63–79.
5.
GilovichT.ValloneR.TverskyA. (1985) The hot hand in basketball: on the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 295–314.
6.
LewisB. P.LinderD. E. (1997) Thinking about choking? Attentional processes and paradoxical performance. Personality and Social Bulletin, 23, 937–944.
7.
NidefferR. M. (1993) Concentration and attention control training. In WilliamsJ. M. (Ed.), Applied sport psychology: personal growth to peak performance. London: Mayfield. Pp. 243–261.
8.
SiwoffS.HirdtS.HirdtP. (1987) The 1987 Elias baseball analyst. New York: Collier Books.
9.
WardropR. L. (1995) Simpson's paradox and the hot hand in basketball. The American Statistician, 49, 24–28.
10.
ZaichkowskyL. D.BaltzellA. (2001) Arousal and performance. In SingerR. N.HausenblasH. A.JanelleC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology. (2nd ed.) New York: Wiley. Pp. 319–339.
