Random number generation is a task that engages working memory and executive processes within the domain of number representation. In the present study we address the role of language in number processing by switching languages during random number generation (numbers 1–9), using German (L1) and English (L2), and alternating L1/L2. Results indicate large correspondence between performance in L1 and L2. In contrast to nonswitching performance, randomization with alternating languages showed a significant increase of omitted responses, whereas the random sequences were less stereotyped, showing significantly less repetition avoidance and cycling behavior. During an intentional switch between languages, errors in language sequence appeared in 23% of responses on the average, independently of the quality of randomization but associated with a clear persistence of L2. These results indicate that random number generation is more closely linked to auditory-phonological representation of numerals than to visual arabic notation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportA.StylesE. A.HsiehS. (1994) Shifting intentional set: exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In UmiltàC.MoscovitchM. (Eds.), Attention and performance: XV. Conscious and nonconscious information processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pp. 421–452.
2.
BächtoldD.BaumüllerM.BruggerP. (1998) Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia, 36, 731–735.
3.
BaddeleyA. D. (1966) The capacity for generating information by randomization. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 119–129.
4.
BaddeleyA. D. (1986) Working memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univer. Press.
5.
BaddeleyA. D. (1996) Exploring the central executive. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 5–28.
6.
BaddeleyA. D.EmslieH.KolodnyJ.DuncanJ. (1998) Random generation and the executive control of working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 819–852.
7.
BookheimerS. Y.ZeffiroT. A.BlaxtonT. A.GaillardW.TheodoreW. H. (2000) Activation of language cortex with automatic speech tasks. Neurology, 55, 1151–1157.
8.
BrownR. G.SoliveriP.JahanshahiM. (1998) Executive processes in Parkinson's disease—random number generation and response suppression. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1355–1362.
9.
BruggerP. (1997) Variables that influence the generation of random sequences: an update. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 627–661.
10.
BruggerP.MonschA. U.SalmonD. P.ButtersN. (1996) Random generation in dementia of the Alzheimer type: a test of frontal executive functions. Neuropsychologia, 34, 97–103.
11.
BrysbaertM. (1995) Arabic number reading: on the nature of the numerical scale and the origin of phonological recoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 434–452.
12.
BrysbaertM.FiasW.NoelM. P. (1998) The Whorfian hypothesis and numerical cognition: is ‘twenty-four’ processed in the same way as ‘four-and-twenty’?Cognition, 66, 51–77.
13.
CampbellJ. (1994) Architectures for numerical cognition. Cognition, 53, 1–44.
14.
DehaeneS. (1992) Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1–42.
15.
DehaeneS. (1996) The organization of brain activations in number comparison: event-related potentials and the additive-factors methods. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 47–68.
16.
DehaeneS.BossiniS.GirauxP. (1993) The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396.
17.
DehaeneS.SpelkeE.PinelP.StanescuR.TsivkinS. (1999) Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970–974.
18.
EvansF. J. (1978) Monitoring attention deployment by random number generation: an index to measure subjective randomness. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 35–38.
19.
FalkR.KonoldC. (1997) Making sense of randomness: implicit encoding as a basis for judgement. Psychological Review, 104, 301–318.
20.
FerreiraF.SwetsB. (2002) How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 57–84.
21.
FischerM. H. (2001) Number processing induces spatial performance biases. Neurology, 57, 822–826.
22.
FürstA. J.HitchG. J. (2000) Separate roles for executive and phonological component of working memory in mental arithmetic. Memory & Cognition, 28, 774–782.
23.
GinsburgN.KarpiukP. (1994) Random generation: analysis of the responses. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 1059–1067.
24.
GlanzerM.ClarkW. H. (1962) Accuracy of perceptual recall: an analysis of organization. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1, 289–299.
25.
HorneR. L.EvansF. J.OrneM. T. (1982) Random number generation, psychopathology, and therapeutic change. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 680–683.
26.
JahanshahiM.DirnbergerG. (1999) The left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and random generation of responses: studies with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 37, 181–190.
27.
JahanshahiM.ProficeP.BrownR. G.RiddingM. C.DirnbergerG.RothwellJ. C. (1998) The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on suppression of habitual counting during random number generation. Brain, 121, 1533–1544.
28.
JersildA. T. (1927) Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, 89, 5–82.
29.
LeeK. M.KangS. Y. (2002) Arithmetic operation and working memory: differential suppression in dual tasks. Cognition, 83, B63–B68.
30.
MeuterR. F.AllportA. (1999) Bilingual language switching in naming: asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 25–40.
31.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P.EmersonM. J.WitzkiA. H.HowerterA.WagnerT. D. (2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.
32.
MonsellS.YeungN.AzumaR. (2000) Reconfiguration of task-set: is it easier to switch to the weaker task?Psychological Research, 63, 250–264.
33.
NoelM. P.RobertA.BrysbaertM. (1998) Does language really matter when doing arithmetic? Reply to Campbell. Cognition, 67, 365–373.
34.
OldfieldR. C. (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
35.
PaulescuE.FrithC. D.FrackowiakR. S. (1993) The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory. Nature, 362, 342–345.
36.
PriceC. J.GreenD. W.von StudnitzR. (1999) A functional imaging study of translation and language switching. Brain, 122, 2221–2235.
37.
RabinowitzF. M.DunlapW. P.GrantM. J.CampioneJ. C. (1989) The rules used by children and adults in attempting to generate random numbers. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33, 227–287.
38.
ReitanR. M. (1958) Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8, 271–276.
39.
ReynvoetB.BrysbaertM.FiasW. (2002) Semantic priming in number naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1127–1139.
40.
RogersR. D.MonsellS. (1995) Costs of predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231.
41.
SpattJ.GoldenbergG. (1993) Components of random generation by normal subjects and patients with dysexecutive syndrome. Brain and Cognition, 23, 231–242.
42.
SpreenO.StraussE. (1998) A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms and commentary. (2nd ed.) New York: Oxford Univer. Press.
43.
Stanescu-CossonR.PinelP.Van de MoorteleP.Le BihanD.CohenL.DehaeneS. (2000) Understanding dissociations in dyscalculia, a brain imaging study of the impact of number size on the cerebral networks for exact and approximate calculation. Brain, 123, 2240–2255.
44.
StrengeH.BöhmJ. (2004) Random number generation in native and foreign languages. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 1153–1161.
45.
VitzP. C.ToddT. C. (1969) A coded element model of the perceptual processing of sequential stimuli. Pychological Review, 76, 433–449.
46.
WiegersmaS. (1984) High-speed sequential vocal response production. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 43–50.
47.
WoodwardT. S.BubD. N.HunterM. A. (2002) Task switching deficits associated with Parkinson's disease reflect depleted attentional resources. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1948–1955.
48.
YeungN.MonsellS. (2003) Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: the role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 455–469.
49.
ZorziM.PriftisK.UmiltàC. (2002) Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature, 417, 138–139.
