Erratum

Abstract

On the very last line of page 1022, “MEQ score” should read instead, “MEQ category.”

Vitale, J. A., Calogiuri, G., & Weydahl, A. (2013) Influence of chronotype on responses to a standardized, self-paced walking task in the morning vs afternoon: a pilot study. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 116, 3, 1020–1028. DOI: 10.2466/06.19.PMS.116.3.1020-1028

The last lines on page 1023 should read:

“This was confirmed by MANOVA, which did show a main effect for chronotype (MEQ category, p = .04) with a fairly high effect size and adequate power (partial η² = 0.16; estimated power = 0.76). Cohen's d values for evening types vs morning types in the morning test were −0.06, −0.90, and 1.65 for ‘time for completion,’ ‘HRmean,’ and RPE,’ respectively. Including an experimental condition in the study design (i.e., walking test later in the evening) could lead to an inversion of the psychophysiological response in favor of the individuals with Evening preference.”