The aims of the present study were to identify (i) home advantage in elite handball according to the quality of opponent, (ii) the game periods where the teams score more goals, and (iii) the game statistics associated with the teams' success according to the game's location. The sample comprised 480 regular season games (2007–2009) from the Spanish Professional Handball League. The goals scored and shot effectiveness (6 m, 7 m, 9 m and fast breaks) were analyzed for each 5-min. game period in games between players of balanced and unbalanced quality. The home advantage was 64%, with higher values (71%) in balanced and lower values (55%) in unbalanced games. The 5-min. game periods in which teams scored more goals were the last 5-min. period of each half, especially in the second half. The effectiveness was only different in shots closer to the goal (6 m), which supports the territoriality theory of home advantage.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bar-EliM.TenenbaumG.ElbazG. (1990) Psychological performance crisis in high arousal situations: Diagnosticity of rule violations and performance in competitive team-handball. Anxiety Research, 2, 281–292.
2.
Bar-EliM.TractinskyN. (2000) Criticality of game situations and decision making in basketball: An application of performance crisis perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 1, 27–39.
3.
BrayS.JonesM.OwenS. (2002) The influence of competition location on athletes' psychological states. Journal of Sport Behavior, 25, 231–242.
4.
BrayS.WidmeyerW. (2000) Athletes' perceptions of the home advantage: An investigation of perceived causal factors. Journal of Sport Behavior, 23, 1–10.
5.
CarronA.LoughheadT.BrayS. (2005) The home advantage in sport competitions: Courneya and Carron's (1992) conceptual framework a decade later. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23, 395–407.
6.
CourneyaK.CarronA. (1992) The home advantage in sport competitions: A literature review. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology14, 13–27.
7.
GómezM. A.GómezM.LagoC.SampaioJ. (2011) Effects of game location and final outcome on game-related statistics in each zone of the pitch in professional football. European Journal of Sport Science, 1–6.
8.
GómezM. A.LorenzoA.IbáñezS. J.OrtegaE.LeiteN.SampaioJ. (2010) An analysis of defensive strategies used by home and away basketball teams. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110, 159–166.
9.
GómezM.LorenzoA.SampaioJ.IbáñezS.OrtegaE. (2008) Game-related statistics that discriminated winning and losing teams from the Spanish men's professional basketball teams. Collegium Antropologicum, 32, 451–456.
10.
GómezM. A.PollardR. (2011) Reduced home advantage for basketball teams from capital cities in Europe. European Journal of Sport Science, 11, 143–148.
11.
GómezM. A.PollardR.Luis-PascualJ. C. (2011) Comparison of the home advantage in nine different professional team sports in Spain. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 113, 150–156.
12.
GruićI.VuletaD.MilanovićD. (2006) Performance indicators of teams at the 2003 Men's World Handball Championship in Portugal. Kinesiology, 38, 164–175.
KaminskyJ. (1990) Critical game time periods in relation to teams success in college basketball. Unpublished master's thesis, Kent State Univer., Ohio
17.
KoningR. (2005) Home advantage in speed skating: Evidence from individual data. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23, 417–427.
18.
LagoC. (2009) The influence of match location, quality of opposition, and match status on possession strategies in professional association football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27, 1463–1469.
19.
LagoC.LagoJ. (2011) Game location and team quality effects on performance profiles in professional soccer. Journal of Sports Sciences and Medicine, 10, 465–471.
20.
LagoC.MartinR. (2007) Determinants of possession of the ball in soccer. Journal of Sports Sciences, 125, 969–974.
21.
LamesM.McGarryT. (2007) On the search for reliable performance indicators in game sports. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 7, 62–79.
22.
MadrigalR.JamesJ. (1999) Team quality and the home advantage. Journal of Sport Behavior, 22, 381–398.
23.
MazurA.BoothA. (1998) Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavior Brain Science, 21, 353–363.
24.
McGarryT.AndersonD.WallaceS.HughesM.FranksI. (2002) Sport competition as a dynamical self-organizing system. Journal of Sport Sciences, 20, 771–781.
MorleyB.ThomasD. (2005) An investigation of home advantage and other factors affecting outcomes in English one-day cricket matches. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23, 261–268.
27.
NeaveN.WolfsonS. (2003) Testosterone, territoriality, and the “home advantage.”Physiology and Behavior, 78, 269–275.
28.
NevillA.HolderR. (1999) Home advantage in sport: An overview of studies on the advantage of playing at home. Sports Medicine, 28(4), 221–236.
29.
O'DonoghueP. (2009) Interacting performances theory. International Journal of Performance Analysis of Sport, 9, 26–46.
30.
OhnjecK.VuletaD.MilanovićD.GruićI. (2008) Performance Indicators of teams at the 2003 World Handball Championship for Women in Croatia. Kinesiology, 40, 69–79.
31.
PageL.PageK. (2007) The second leg home advantage: Evidence from European football cup competitions. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 1547–1556.
32.
PollardR. (2006) Home advantage in soccer: Variations in its magnitude and a literature review of the inter-related factors associated with its existence. Journal of Sport Behavior, 29, 169–189.
33.
PollardR. (2008) Home advantage in football: A current review of an unsolved puzzle. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 1, 12–14.
34.
PollardR.GómezM. (2009) Home advantage in football in South-West Europe: Long-term trends, regional variation, and team differences. European Journal of Sport Science, 9, 341–352.
35.
RoguljN.SrhojV.SrhojL. (2004) The contribution of collective attack tactics in differentiating handball score efficiency. Collegium Antropologicum, 28, 739–746.
36.
RostD. (1995) A simulation study of the weighted k-means cluster procedure. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 53, 51–63.
37.
SackR. (1986) Human territoriality: Its theory and history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer. Press.
38.
SafritM.WoodT. (2001) Introduction to measurement in physical education and exercise science with powerweb: Health and human performance. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.
39.
SampaioJ.DrinkwaterE. J.LeiteN. (2010) Effects of season period, team quality, and playing time on basketball players' game-related statistics. European Journal of Sport Sciences, 10, 141–149.
40.
SampaioJ.LagoC.CasaisL.LeiteN. (2010) Effects of starting score-line, game location and quality of opposition in basketball quarter score. European Journal of Sport Sciences, 10, 391–396.
41.
SampaioJ.LagoC.DrinkwaterE. J. (2010) Explanations for the United States of America's dominance in basketball at the Beijing Olympic Games (2008). Journal of Sports Sciences, 28, 147–152.
42.
SchwartzB.BarskyS. (1977) The home advantage. Social Forces, 55, 641–661.
43.
SmithD. (2005) Disconnects between popular discourse and home advantage research: What can fans and media tell us about the home advantage phenomenon?Journal of Sports Sciences, 23, 351–364.
44.
SrhojV.RoguljN.KatićR. (2001) Influence of the attack end conduction on match result in handball. Collegium Antropologicum, 25, 611–617.
45.
StraußB.BierschwaleJ. (2008) Spectators and the home advantage in the German national handball league. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie, 15, 96–101.
46.
VuletaD.MilanovićD.GruićI.OhnjecK. (2005) Influence of the goals scored in the different time periods of the game on the final outcome of matches on the 2003 Men's World Handball Championships, Portugal. Paper presented at the 4th International Scientific Conference of Kinesiology, Croatia.
