Aesthetic quality is central to textile conservators when evaluating a conservation method. However, the literature on textile conservation chiefly focuses on physical properties, and little is known about what factors determine aesthetic quality according to textile conservators. The latter was explored through two experiments. Experiment 1 explored the underlying attributes of aesthetic quality of textile conservation interventions. Experiment 2 explored the relationships between these attributes and how well they predicted aesthetic quality. Rank-order correlation analyses revealed two latent factors called Coherence and Completeness. Ordinal regression analysis revealed that Coherence was the most important predictor of aesthetic quality. This means that a successful conservation intervention is visually well-integrated with the textile item in terms of the material and method.
AxelssonÖ. (2007a) Individual differences in preferences to photographs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 61–72. DOI: 10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.61.
3.
AxelssonÖ. (2007b) Towards a psychology of photography: Dimensions underlying aesthetic appeal of photographs. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 105(2), 411–434. DOI: 10.2466/PMS.105.6.411–434.
BrajerI. (2009) The concept of authenticity expressed in the intervention of wall paintings in Denmark. In RichmondA.BrackerA. L. (Eds.), Conservation: Principles, dilemmas and uncomfortable truths. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann. Pp. 84–99.
6.
CarbonC. C. (2011) Cognitive mechanisms for explaining dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. i-Perception, 2, 708–719. DOI: 10.1068/i0463aap.
7.
CarbonC. C.LederH. (2005) The Repeated Evaluation Technique (RET): A method to capture dynamic effects of innovativeness and attractiveness. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(5), 587–601. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1098.
8.
CloonanM. V. (1995) Bookbinding, aesthetics, and conservation. Libraries & Culture, 30(2), 137–152. Retrieved November 15, 2013, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25542744.
9.
ContiS. (2011) Loss in textiles: Technological and color problems (2004). In BrooksM.M.EastopD. D. (Eds.), Changing views of textile conservation. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Conservation Institute. Pp. 438–441.
10.
CoxD.CoxA. D. (2002) Beyond first impressions: The effects of repeated exposure on consumer liking of visually complex and simple product designs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(2), 119–130. DOI: 10.1177/03079459994371.
11.
FaerberS. J.LederH.GergerG.CarbonC. C. (2010) Priming semantic concepts affects the dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 191–200. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.06.006.
12.
Flury-LembergM. (1988) Textile conservation and research. Bern, Switzerland: Abegg Stif-tung.
13.
GattolV.SaaksjarviM.CarbonC. C. (2011) Extending the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Assessing consumer attitudes based on multi-dimensional implicit associations. PLOS ONE, 6(1), e15849. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015849.
14.
GescheiderG. A. (1997) Psychophysics: The fundamentals. London, UK: Erlbaum.
15.
GillK. (2006) Tapestry as upholstery: The challenges of conserving tapestry-covered seat furniture. In LennardF.HaywardM. (Eds.), Tapestry conservation: Principles and practice. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann. Pp. 113–122.
KaldanyM.BermanM.SigurdardottirS. (1999) Evaluating the stability of commercially available artists' coloring materials used to create compensation infills for losses in textiles. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 38(3), 443–458. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3180002.
18.
LandiS. (1992) The textile conservator's manual. London, UK: Butterworth.
19.
LennardF. (2006a) Preserving image and structure: Tapestry conservation in Europe and the United States. Reviews in Conservation, 7, 43–53.
20.
LennardF. (2006b) The art of tapestry conservation. In LennardF.HaywardM. (Eds.), Tapestry conservation: Principles and practice. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann. Pp. 3–12.
21.
LennardF.BaldursdóttirT.LoosemoreV. (2008) Using digital and hand printing techniques to compensate for loss: Re-establishing colour and texture in historic textiles. The Conservator, 31(1), 55–65. Retrieved from http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/48364.
22.
ViñjasMuños S. (2005) Contemporary theory of conservation. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
23.
NilssonJ. (2005) A survey of the most common support methods used on historical costumes and a preliminary investigation of tests assessing the quality of conserved fabrics. In JanawayR.WyethP. (Eds.), Scientific analysis of ancient and historic textiles: Informing preservation, display and interpretation. London, UK: Archetype Publications. Pp. 79–85.
