In this study, a situation-augmented display for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) monitoring was designed, and its effects on operator performance and mental workload were examined. The display design was augmented with the knowledge that there is an invariant flight trajectory (formed by the relationship between altitude and velocity) for every flight, from takeoff to landing. 56 participants were randomly assigned to the situation-augmented display or a conventional display condition to work on 4 (number of abnormalities) × 2 (noise level) UAV monitoring tasks three times. Results showed that the effects of situation-augmented display on flight completion time and time to detect abnormalities were robust under various workload conditions, but error rate and perceived mental workload were unaffected by the display type. Results suggest that the UAV monitoring task is extremely difficult, and that display devices providing high-level situation-awareness may improve operator monitoring performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BennettK. B.TomsM. L.WoodsD. D. (1993) Emergent features and graphical elements: designing more effective configural displays. Human Factors, 35(1), 71–97.
2.
CarouxL.Le BigotL.VibertN. (2011) Maximizing players' anticipation by applying the proximity-compatibility principle to the design of video games. Human Factors, 53(2), 103–117.
3.
CharltonS. G.O'BrienT. G., & NetLibrary, Inc. (2002) Handbook of human factors testing and evaluation. (2nd ed.) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
ChenI. P.LiaoC. N.YehS. H. (2011) Effect of display size on visual attention. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 112(3), 959–974.
5.
ChenJ. Y. C.BarnesM. J.Harper-SciariniM. (2011) Supervisory control of multiple robots: human-performance issues and user-interface design. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics–Part C: Applications and Reviews, 41(4), 435–454.
6.
ChenJ. Y. C.HassE.BarnesJ. (2007) Human performance issues and user interface design for teleoperated robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics–Part C: Applications and Reviews, 37(6), 1231–1245.
7.
DixonS. R.WickensC. D.ChangD. (2005) Mission control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles: a workload analysis. Human Factors, 47(3), 479–487.
8.
EndsleyM. R. (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32–64.
9.
EndsleyM. R.BolstadC. A.JonesD. G.RileyJ. M. (2003) Situation awareness oriented design: from user's cognitive requirements to creating effective supporting technologies. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting. Pp. 268–272.
10.
EndsleyM. R.JonesD. G. (2012) Designing for situtation awareness: an approach to user-centered design. (2nd ed.) New York: CRC Press.
11.
FongT.ThorpeC. (2001) Vehicle teleoperation interfaces. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, California, April 24–28.
12.
GunnD. V.WarmJ. S.NelsonW. T.BoliaR. S.SchumskyD. A.CorcoranK. J. (2005) Target acquisition with UAVs: vigilance displays and advanced cuing interfaces. Human Factors, 47(3), 488–497.
13.
HartS. G.StavelandL. E. (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In HancockP.MeshkatiN. (Eds.), Human mental workload. Amsterdam: North Holland. Pp. 139–183.
14.
JonesD. G.EndsleyM. R. (1996) Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, 67(6), 507–512.
15.
JonesR. E. T.ConnorsE. S.EndsleyM. R. (2011) A framework for representing agent and human situation awareness. In Proceedings of the International Multi-disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Sitation Awareness & Decision Support, February 22–24. Pp. 226–233.
16.
LathanC. E.TraceyM. (2002) The effects of operator spatial perception and sensory feedback on human-robot teleoperation performance. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 11(4), 368–377.
17.
MackA.RockI. (1998) Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
NielsenC. W.GoodrichM. A.RicksR. W. (2007) Ecological interfaces for improving mobile robot teleoperation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5), 927–941.
19.
PrewettM. S.JohnsonR. C.SaboeK. N.ElliottL. R.CoovertM. D. (2010) Managing workload in human-robot interaction: a review of empirical studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 840–856.
20.
RaymondJ. E.ShapiroK. L.ArnellK. M. (1992) Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 849–860.
21.
RuffH. A.NarayananS.DraperM. H. (2002) Human interaction with levels of automation and decision-aid fidelity in the supervisory control of multiple simulated unmanned air vehicles. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 11(4), 335–351.
22.
SzalmaJ. L. (2011) Workload and stress in vigilance: the impact of display format and task type. American Journal of Psychology, 124(4), 441–454.
23.
WickensC. D.CarswellC. M. (1995) The proximity compatibility principles: its psychological foundation and relevance to display design. Human Factors, 37, 473–494.
24.
WickensC. D.GohJ.HellebergJ.HorreyW. J.TalleurD. A. (2003) Attentional models of multitask pilot performance using advanced display technology. Human Factors, 45(3), 360–380.
25.
WickensC. D.LiuY.GordonS. E. (2004) An introduction to human factors engineering. (2nd ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
