Psychometric properties of the Group Environment Questionnaire were investigated in a large sample of soccer (n = 222) and professional basketball players (n = 375). Confirmatory factor analysis was performed both on the total sample and on the two subsamples through a multi-group approach; associations between cohesion and the duration of belonging to the team were also explored. Results confirmed the four-factor structure proposed by Carron's original model even though some items with low loadings were eliminated. No significant associations were found between team cohesion and the duration of belonging to the team.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlanchardC.PoonP.RodgersW.PinelB. (2000) Group Environment Questionnaire and its applicability in an exercise setting. Small Group Research, 31(2), 210–224.
2.
BooneK. S.BeitelP.KuhlmanJ. S. (1997) The effects of the win/loss record on cohesion. Journal of Sport Behavior, 20(2), 125–134.
3.
BrawleyL. R.CarronA. V. (2003) Caution in interpreting confirmatory factor analysis of the Group Environment Questionnaire: A response to Sullivan, Short, and Cramer (2002). Perceptual & Motor Skills, 97(1), 315–318.
4.
BrawleyL. R.CarronA. V.WidmeyerW. N. (1987) Assessing the cohesion of teams: Validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 9(3), 275–294.
5.
BrawleyL. R.CarronA. V.WidmeyerW. N. (1993) The influence of the group and its cohesiveness on perceptions of group goal-related variables. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(3), 245–260.
6.
CarlessS. A.De PaolaC. (2000) The measurement of cohesion in work teams. Small Group Research, 31(1), 71–88.
7.
CarronA. V. (1982) Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4(2), 123–138.
8.
CarronA. V.BrawleyL. R. (2000) Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 31(1), 89–106.
9.
CarronA. V.BrawleyL. R. (2008) Group dynamics in sport and physical activity. In HornT. S. (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology. (3rd ed.) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
10.
CarronA. V.BrawleyL. R.WidmeyerW. N. (1998) The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. In DudaJ. L. (ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology. Pp. 213–226.
11.
CarronA. V.BrayS. R.EysM. A. (2002) Team cohesion and team success in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20(2), 119–126.
12.
CarronA. V.ColmanM. M.WheelerJ.StevensD. (2002) Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24(2), 168–188.
13.
CarronA. V.EysM. A.BurkeS. M. (2007) Team cohesion: Nature, correlates, and development. In JowettS.LavalleeD. (Eds.), Social psychology in sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Pp. 91–101.
14.
CarronA. V.HausenblasH. (1998) Group dynamics in sports: Group leadership. London: Faculty of Kinesiology, Univer. of Western Ontario.
15.
CarronA. V.WidmeyerW. N.BrawleyL. R. (1985) The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7(3), 244–266.
16.
CarronA. V.WidmeyerW. N.BrawleyL. R. (1988) Group cohesion and individual adherence to physical activity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10(2), 127–138.
17.
Casey-CampbellM.MartensM. L. (2009) Sticking it all together: A critical assessment of the group cohesion-performance literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(2), 223–246.
18.
ChangA.BordiaP. (2001) A multidimensional approach to the group cohesion-group performance relationship. Small Group Research, 32(4), 379–405.
19.
DyceJ. A.CornellJ. (1996) Factorial validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire among musicians. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(2), 263–264.
20.
EvansN. J.JarvisP. A. (1986) The Group Attitude Scale: A measure of attraction to groups. Small Group Behavior, 17(2), 203–216.
21.
EysM. A.CarronA. V.BrayS. R.BrawleyL. R. (2007) Item wording and internal consistency of a measure of cohesion: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 395–402.
22.
GiovanniniD.SavoiaL. (2002) Psicologia dello sport [Sport psychology]. Rome: Carocci.
23.
HeuzéJ. P.RaimbaultN.FontayneP. (2006) Relationships between cohesion, collective efficacy and performance in professional basketball teams: An examination of mediating effects. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(1), 59–68.
24.
HoigaardR.SafvenbomR.TønnessenF. E. (2006) The relationship between group cohesion, group norms, and perceived social loafing in soccer teams. Small Group Research, 37(3), 217–232.
25.
IturbideL. M.ElosuaP.YanesF. (2010) Medida de la cohesión en equipos deportivos. Adaptación al español del Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ) [A measure of team cohesion in sport. Spanish adaptation of Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ)]. Psicothema, 22(3), 482–488.
26.
KozubS. A.McDonnellJ. F. (2000) Exploring the relationship between cohesion and collective efficacy in rugby teams. Journal of Sport Behavior, 23(2), 120–129.
27.
LiF.HarmerP. (1996) Confirmatory factor analysis of the Group Environment Questionnaire with an intercollegiate sample. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 49–63.
28.
MatthewsW. K.KitsantasA. (2007) Group cohesion, collective efficacy, and motivational climate as predictors of conductor support in music ensembles. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55(1), 6–17.
29.
NtoumanisN.AggelonidisY. (2004) A psychometric evaluation of the Group Environment Questionnaire in a sample of elite and regional level Greek volleyball players. European Physical Education Review, 10(3), 261–278.
30.
PaskevichD. M.BrawleyL. R.DorschK. D.WidmeyerW. N. (1999) Relationship between collective efficacy and team cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3(3), 210–222.
31.
PrapavessisH.CarronA. V. (1997) Sacrifice, cohesion, and conformity to norms in sport teams. Group Dynamics, 1(3), 231–240.
32.
RosenfeldL. B.GilbertJ. R. (1989) The measurement of cohesion and its relationship to dimensions of self-disclosure in classroom settings. Small Group Behavior, 20(3), 291–301.
33.
SchutzR. W.EomH. J.SmollF. L.SmithR. E. (1994) Examination of the factorial validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65(3), 226–236.
34.
ShapcottK. M.CarronA. V. (2010) Development and validation of a Team Attributional Style Questionnaire. Group Dynamic Theory, Research, and Practice, 14(2), 93–113.
35.
ShieldsD. L. L.BredemeierB. J. L.GardnerD. E.BostromA. (1995) Leadership, cohesion and team norms regarding cheating and aggression. Sociology of Sport Journal, 12(3), 324–236.
36.
SlaterM. R.SewellD. F. (1994) An examination of the cohesion-performance relationship in university hockey teams. Journal of Sports Sciences, 12(5), 423–431.
37.
SpinkK. S. (1990) Group cohesion and collective efficacy of volleyball teams. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12(3), 301–311.
38.
SullivanP. J.FeltzD. L. (2001) The relationship between intrateam conflict and cohesion within hockey teams. Small Group Research, 32(3), 342–355.
39.
SullivanP. J.ShortS. E.CramerK. M. (2002) Confirmatory factor analysis of the Group Environment Questionnaire with co-acting sports. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 94(1), 341–347.
40.
TerryP. C.CarronA. V.PinkM. J.LaneA. M.JonesG. J. W.HallM. P. (2000) Perceptions of group cohesion and mood in sport teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(3), 244–253.
41.
WeinbergR. S.GouldD. (2003) Foundations of sport and exercise psychology. (3rd ed.) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
42.
WidmeyerN.BrawleyL.CarronA. (1985) The measurement of co hesion in sports teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. London, Ontario, Canada: Sports Dynamics.
43.
WilhelmA. (2001) Im team zum erfolg. Ein sozial-motivationales verhaltensmodell zur mannschaftsleistung [The team to success: A social-behavioral model for motivational team performance]. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.
44.
ZakrajsekR. A.AbildsoC. G.HurstJ. R.WatsonJ. C.II (2007) The relationship among coaches and athletes perceptions of coaching staff cohesion, team cohesion, and performance. The Online Journal of Sport Psychology, 9(3), 1–12.
