Technological advances have driven the development of information technology (IT) products and communication using mobile devices has become a part of daily life. When using mobile devices, reading time and font size are important communication elements that significantly affect reading performance. However, studies of reading performance in older samples have mainly used printed material or computer monitors; this study examined the performance of users when reading text messages on the interfaces of mobile devices and described their visual limitations. Sixty-two participants took part in the experiment, which involved displaying different font sizes and exposure times. The younger group read 10-point font accurately, while the older group had much worse accuracy, even at 14 points. The younger group correctly read text messages displayed for 0.4 sec. above 80% of the time, while the older group's accuracy was severely impaired even when text was displayed for 1 sec.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Al-HarkanI. M.RamadanM. Z. (2005) Effects of pixel shape and color, and matrix pixel density of Arabic digital typeface on characters' legibility. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35, 652–664.
2.
ArningK.ZiefleM. (2009) Effects of age, cognitive, and personal factors on PDA menu navigation performance. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(3), 251–268.
3.
BarakovicS.Skorin-KapovL. (2015) Multidimensional modelling of quality of experience for mobile Web browsing. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 314–332.
4.
BernardM. L.ChaparroB. S.MillsM. M.HalcombC. G. (2003) Comparing the effects of text size and format on the readability of computer-displayed Times New Roman and Arial text. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 823–835.
5.
BorgO.CasanovaR.CotonC.BarlaC.BootsmaR. J. (2015) Stimulus duration thresholds for reading numerical time information: effects of visual size and number of time units. Displays, 36, 30–33.
6.
ChangP. T.KonzS. (1993) Character sizes viewing distance on VDTS. In LuczakH.ÇakirA.ÇakirG. (Eds.), Work with Display Units 92. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science. Pp. 143–147.
7.
ChoiJ. H.LeeH. J. (2012) Facets of simplicity for the smartphone interface: a structural model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(2), 129–142.
8.
GayL. R. (1992) Educational research competencies for analysis and application. New York: Macmillan.
9.
HuangK. C.YehP. C. (2007) Numeral size, spacing between targets, and exposure time in discrimination by older people using an LCD monitor. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 104, 543–546.
10.
ImC.ParkM. (2014) Development and evaluation of a computerized multimedia approach to educate older adults about safe medication. Asian Nursing Research, 8(3), 193–200.
11.
ImbeauD.WierwilleW. W.WolfL. D.ChunG. A. (1989) Effects of instrument panel luminance and chromaticity on reading performance and preference in simulated driving. Human Factors, 31(2), 147–160.
12.
LeeD.MoonJ.KimY. J.YiM. Y. (2015) Antecedents and consequences of mobile phone usability: linking simplicity and interactivity to satisfaction, trust, and brand loyalty. Information & Management, 52(3), 295–304.
13.
LeeD. S.KoY. H.ShenI. H.ChaoC. Y. (2011) Effect of light source, ambient illumination, character size and interline spacing on visual performance and visual fatigue with electronic paper displays. Displays, 32(1), 1–7.
14.
LeeD. S.ShiehK. K.JengS. C.ShenI. H. (2008) Effect of character size and lighting on legibility of electronic papers. Displays, 29(1), 10–17.
15.
LemmeB. H. (2002) Development in adulthood. (3rd ed.) Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
16.
LindbergT.NäsänenR.MüllerK. (2006) How age affects the speed of perception of computer icons. Displays, 27(4–5), 170–177.
17.
MahmudA. A.MubinO.ShahidS.MartensJ. B. (2010) Designing social games for children and older adults: two related case studies. Entertainment Computing, 1(3–4), 147–156.
18.
MoisescuP. C. (2014) The social integration of elders through free-time activities. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4159–4163.
19.
OehlM.SutterC. (2015) Age-related differences in processing visual device and task characteristics when using technical devices. Applied Ergonomics, 48, 214–223.
20.
PaJ.DuttS.MirskyJ. B.HeuerH. W.KeselmanP.KongE.TrujilloA.GazzaleyA.KramerJ. H.SeeleyW. W.MillerB. L.BoxerA. L. (2014) The functional oculomotor network and saccadic cognitive control in healthy elders. NeuroImage, 95(15), 61–68.
21.
PetrovčičA.FortunatiL.VehovarV.KavčičM.DolničarV. (2015) Mobile phone communication in social support networks of older adults in Slovenia. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 642–655.
22.
PotterL. M.GrealyM. A.ElliottM. A.AndrésP. (2012) Aging and performance on an everyday-based visual search task. Acta Psychologica, 140(3), 208–217.
23.
RamadanM. Z. (2011) Evaluating college students' performance of Arabic typeface style, font size, page layout and foreground/background color combinations of e-book materials. Journal of King Saud University: Engineering Sciences, 23(2), 89–100.
24.
RamigL. A. (1983) Effects of physiological aging on speaking and reading rates. Journal of Communication Disorders, 16(3), 211–226.
25.
RodriguesÉ.CarreiraM.GonçalvesD. (2014) Developing a multimodal interface for the older. Procedia Computer Science, 27, 359–368.
26.
RyuM. H.KimS.LeeE. (2009) Understanding the factors affecting online older user's participation in video UCC services. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 619–632.
27.
SchenkmanB. N.SchmidR. (2003) Appearance, clarity, acceptance and beauty of jagged letters on computer screens. Displays, 24, 15–23.
28.
SheedyJ.TaiY. C.SubbaramM.GowrisankaranS.HayesmJ. (2008) Clear type sub-pixel text rendering: preference, legibility and reading performance. Displays, 29, 138–151.
29.
ShresthaG. S.KaitiR. (2014) Visual functions and disability in diabetic retinopathy patients. Journal of Optometry, 7(1), 37–43.
30.
SilverN. C.BraunC. C. (1993) Perceived readability of warning labels with varied font sizes and styles. Safety Science, 16, 615–625.
31.
WangA. H.HwangS. L.KuoH. T. (2012) Effects of bending curvature and ambient illuminance on the visual performance of young and older participants using simulated electronic paper displays. Displays, 33(1), 36–41.
32.
WangW. Y.TsaiP. Y. (2003) The effects of different solid line as direct cue for the elderly on visual search of texts in a lump of information. Journal of Design, 8(3), 91–106.
33.
YauY. J.ChaoC. J.HwangS. L. (2008) Optimization of Chinese interface design in motion environments. Displays, 29, 308–315.
34.
ZiefleM. (2010) Information presentation in small screen devices: the trade-off between visual density and menu foresight. Applied Ergonomics, 41(6), 719–730.
