The relationship between the criterion for choosing and the self-choice effects (greater recall in a self-choice compared to a forced-choice condition) on intentional memory was examined. Thirty-three female nursing school volunteers were administered 24 word pairs in a 2 × 2 design to assess the influence of motivation upon free recall. When word pairs were presented to participants, they were asked to choose a word to-be-remembered, either in a self-choice condition or a forced-choice condition. Words chosen by the participants were recalled more often than those chosen by the experimenter (forced choice). Thus, the self-choice effect was greater for words chosen with a self-reference criterion compared to a metamemory criterion, supporting the integration hypothesis as the origin of the self-choice effect.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BowerG. H.GilliganS. G. (1979) Remembering information to one's self. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 420–432.
2.
CraikF. I. M.TulvingE. (1975) Depth of processing and retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294.
3.
CzienskowskiU.GiljohannS. (2002) Intimacy, concreteness, and the “self-reference effect.”Experimental Psychology, 49, 73–79.
4.
EinsteinG. O.HuntR. R. (1980) Levels of processing and organization: additive effects of individual-item and relational processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 588–598.
5.
GoldmanS. R.PellegrinoJ. W. (1977) Processing domain, encoding elaboration, and memory trace strength. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 29–43.
6.
HallD. M.GeisM. F. (1980) Congruity and elaboration in free and cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 778–784.
7.
HiranoT.UkitaJ. (2003) Choosing words at the study phase: the self-choice effect on memory from the viewpoint of connective processing. Japanese Psychological Research, 45, 38–49.
8.
HuntR. R.EinsteinG. O. (1981) Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 497–514.
9.
HuntR. R.ElliottJ. M. (1980) The role of nonsemantic information in memory: orthographic distinctiveness effects upon retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 49–74.
10.
HuntR. R.SetaC. E. (1984) Category size effects in recall: the roles of relational and individual item information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 10, 454–464.
11.
HyodoM.TakahashiM.SutoS.YataY.YasunagaM. (2003) [Research on the relation between memory and emotion (4)]. Poster session presented at the 61st annual meeting of the Japanese Congress of Psychology, Tokyo, Japan, September 13. [in Japanese, translated by the author of this article].
12.
MakiR. H.McCaulK. D. (1985) The effects of self-reference versus other-reference on the recall of traits and nouns. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 169–172.
13.
MontyR. A.GellerE. S.SavageR. E.PerlmuterL. C. (1979) The freedom to choose is not always so choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 170–178.
14.
MontyR. A.PerlmuterL. C.LibonD.BennetT. (1982) More on contextual effects on learning and memory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20, 293–296.
15.
MontyR. A.RosenbergerM. A.PerlmuterL. C. (1973) Amount and locus of choice as sources of motivation in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 16–21.
16.
PerlmuterL. C.EadsA. S. (1998) Cognitive and motivational implications. In LomranzJ. (Ed.), Handbook of aging and mental health: an integrative approach. New York: Plenum. Pp. 45–67.
17.
PerlmuterL. C.MontyR. A. (1982) Contextual effects on learning and memory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20, 290–292.
18.
PerlmuterL. C.MontyR. A.KimbleG. A. (1971) Effect of choice on paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 41–53.
19.
RogersT. B. (1981) A model of the self as an aspect of the human information processing system. In CantorN.KihlstromJ. F. (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and social interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 193–213.
20.
RogersT. B.KuiperN. A.KirkerW. S. (1977) Self-reference in the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 35, 677–688.
21.
SoraciS. A.Jr.FranksJ. J.BransfordJ. D.ChechechileR. A.BelliR. F.CarrM.CarlinM. (1994) Incongruous item generation effects: a multi-cue perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 67–78.
22.
TakahashiM. (1989) [The self-choice effect in learning and memory]. Kyoto University Research Studies in Education, 35, 211–221. [in Japanese].
23.
TakahashiM. (1991) The role of choice in memory as a function of age: support for a metamemory interpretation of the self-choice effect. Psychologia, 34, 254–258.
24.
TakahashiM. (1993) [The role of self-choice in recognition memory as a function of the meaningfulness of the materials]. Memoirs of Kyoto Tachibana Women's University, 20, 130–140. [in Japanese with English abstract].
25.
ToyotaH. (1996) Effects of semantic and syntactic congruity on incidental free recall in Japanese sentences. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 82, 811–816.
26.
ToyotaH. (1997) Effects of between-item, within-item, and autobiographical elaborations on incidental free recall. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 85, 1279–1287.
27.
ToyotaH. (2013) The self-choice effects on memory and individual differences in emotional intelligence. Japanese Psychological Research, 55, 45–57.
28.
ToyotaH.KobayashiC. (2009) [Self-choice effects in intentional memory and integration hypothesis]. Bulletin of Nara University of Education, 58, 33–40. [in Japanese with English abstract].
29.
ToyotaH.KobayashiK.HiranoT. (2007) [Self-choice effects in incidental memory and integration hypothesis]. Bulletin of Nara University of Education, 56, 31–39. [in Japanese with English abstract].
30.
WatanabeT. (2001) Effects of constrained choice on memory: the extension of the multiple-cue hypothesis to the self-choice effect. Japanese Psychological Research, 43, 98–104.
