Previous studies have shown that men can balance a dowel rod on the index finger for a longer time than women can. The factors that account for the difference are unknown, but the difference may be attributable either to a difference in whole-body agility or a difference in the use of visual cues. Three experiments involving a total of 62 adult women with a mean age of 21.2yr. (SD = 3.8) and 62 adult men with a mean age of 21.9yr. (SD = 6.6) tested these potential explanations. Experiment 1 replicated the sex difference and assessed the relevance of whole-body agility by comparing standing and seated conditions. Experiments 2 and 3 explored the role of rod length and visual fixation point, respectively. Each experiment yielded a significant sex difference, but the difference was not affected by the participant's posture, the length of the rod, or the fixation point. Possible alternative explanations for the difference include differences in (1) the speed of processing degree of visual tilt; (2) arm mass, which affects the inertia of the balancing system; and (3) experience in open-skill sports.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BenbowC. P. (1988) Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: their nature, effects, and possible causes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 169–232.
2.
BornsteinR. A. (1986) Normative data on intermanual differences on three tests of motor performance. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8, 12–20.
3.
BouchardT. J.Jr.McGeeM. G. (1977) Sex differences in human spatial ability: not an X-linked recessive gene effect. Social Biology, 24, 332–335.
4.
BradyF. (1996) Anticipation of coincidence, gender, and sports classification. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 82, 227–239.
5.
BryantE. C.TrewM. E.BruceA. M.KuismaR. M. E.SmithA. W. (2005) Gender differences in balance performance at the time of retirement. Clinical Biomechanics, 20, 330–335. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.11.006.
6.
CodyK. A.NelsonA. J. (1978) The effect of verticality perception on body balance in normal subjects. Physical Therapy, 58, 35–41.
7.
CohenJ. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
CollinsD. W.KimuraD. (1997) A large sex difference on a two-dimensional mental rotation task. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111(4), 845–849.
9.
CugM.WikstromE. A.GolshaeiB.KirazciS. (in press) The effects of sex, limb dominance and soccer participation on knee proprioception and dynamic posture control. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation.
10.
EngelhardG. (1990) Gender differences in performance on mathematics items: evidence from the United States and Thailand. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 13–16.
11.
FittsP. M. (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.
12.
FranklinG. F.PowellJ. D.Emami-NaeiniA. (2005) Feedback control of dynamic systems. (5th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
GallagherA. M.De LisiR.HolstP. C.McGillicuddy-De LisiA. V.MorelyM.CahalanC. (2000) Gender differences in advanced mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 75, 165–190. DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2532.
14.
GorbetD. J.SergioL. E. (2007) Preliminary sex differences in human cortical BOLD fMRI activity during the preparation of increasingly complex visually guided movements. European Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 1228–1239. DOI: 10.1111/j.14609568.2007.05358.x.
15.
HalpernD. F. (1992) Sex differences in cognitive abilities. (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
HansenS.ElliottD.TremblayL. (2007) Online control of discrete action following visual perturbation. Perception, 36(2), 268–287.
17.
HayL.BardC.FerrelC.OlivierI.FleuryM. (2005) Role of proprioceptive information in movement programming and control in 5- to 11-year-old children. Human Movement Science, 24, 139–154.
18.
HayL.RedonC. (1997) The control of goal-directed movements in children: role of proprioceptive muscle afferents. Human Movement Science, 16, 433–451.
19.
HeatonR. K.GrantI.MatthewsC. G. (1991) Comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan battery: demographic corrections, research findings, and clinical applications. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
20.
HicksR. E. (1975) Intrahemispheric response competition between vocal and unimanual performance in normal adult human males. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 89, 50–60.
21.
HiscockM.PerachioN.InchR. (2001) Is there a sex difference in human laterality? IV. An exhaustive survey of dual-task interference studies from six neuropsychology journals. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 137–148.
22.
JohnsonO.KozmaA. (1977) Effects of concurrent verbal and musical tasks on a unimanual skill. Cortex, 13, 11–16.
23.
JosephJ. E.WillinghamD. B. (2000) Effect of sex and joystick experience on pursuit tracking in adults. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32(1), 45–56.
24.
KimuraD. (1999) Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
KinsbourneM.CookJ. (1971) Generalized and lateralized effects of concurrent verbalization on a unimanual skill. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 341–345.
26.
LavrysenA.HelsenW. F.TremblayL.ElliottD.AdamJ. J.FeysP.BuekersM. J. (2003) The control of sequential aiming movements: the influence of practice and manual asymmetries on the one-target advantage. Cortex, 39, 307–325.
27.
LeeS. J.RenY.KangS. H.GeigerF.ZhangL-Q. (2015) Pivoting neuromuscular control and proprioception in females and males. European Journal of Physiology, 115(4), 775–784. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-014-3062-z.
LomasJ.KimuraD. (1976) Intrahemispheric interaction between speaking and sequential manual activity. Neuropsychologia, 14, 23–33.
30.
MaccobyE. E.JacklinC. N. (1974) The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univer. Press.
31.
NolanL.GrigorenkoA.ThorstenssonA. (2005) Balance control: sex and age differences in 9- to 16-year olds. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 47, 449–454.
32.
OldfieldR. C. (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
33.
OppenheimA. V.WillskyA. S. (1982) Signals and systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34.
PetersM.ServosP. (1989) Performance of subgroups of left-handers and right-handers. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 43(3), 341–358.
35.
PetersM.ServosP.DayR. (1990) Marked sex differences on a fine motor skill disappear when finger size is used as a covariate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 87–90.
36.
PiagetJ.InhelderB. (1956) The child's conception of space. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
37.
RedonC.HayL.RigalR.RollJ. P. (1994) Contribution of the propriomuscular channel to movement coding in children: a study involving the use of vibration-induced kinaesthetic illusion. Human Movement Science, 13(1), 95–108.
38.
RohrL. E. (2006a) Gender-specific movement strategies using a computer-pointing task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 38(6), 431–437. DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.38.6.431-437.
39.
RohrL. E. (2006b) Upper and lower limb reciprocal tapping: evidence for gender biases. Journal of Motor Behavior, 38(1), 15–17. DOI: 10.3200/JMBR38.1.15-17.
40.
RuffR. M.ParkerS. B. (1993) Gender and age-specific changes in motor speed and eye hand coordination in adults: normative values for the Finger Tapping and Grooved Pegboard Tests. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 76, 1219–1230.
41.
SandersB.SoaresM. P.AquilaD. J. M. (1982) The sex difference on one test of spatial visualization: a nontrivial difference. Child Development, 53, 1106–1110.
42.
SappingtonJ. T. (1980) Measures of lateral dominance: interrelationships and temporal stability. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 50, 783–790.
SloanW. (1955) The Lincoln-Oseretsky motor development scale. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 51, 183–252.
45.
SpreenO.StraussE. (1998) A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary. (2nd ed.) New York: Oxford Univer. Press.
46.
Sykes TottenhamL.SaucierD. M.EliasL. J.GutwinC. (2005) Men are more accurate than women in aiming at targets in both near space and extrapersonal space. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 101, 3–12.
47.
TapleyS. M.BrydenM. P. (1977) An investigation of sex differences in spatial ability: mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 31(3), 122–130.
48.
ThomasJ. R.FrenchK. E. (1985) Gender differences across age in motor performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 260–282.
49.
TremblayL.ElliottD.StarkesJ. L. (2004) Gender differences in perception of self-orientation: software or hardware?Perception, 33, 329–337.
50.
VandenbergS. G.KuseA. R. (1978) Mental rotation, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 47, 599–604.
51.
VoyerD.VoyerS.BrydenM. P. (1995) Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250–270.
52.
WeissmanS.DzendoletE. (1972) Effects of visual cues on the standing body sway of males and females. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 34, 951–959.
53.
WilsonJ. R.VandenbergS. G. (1978) Sex differences in cognition: evidence from the Hawaii Family Study. In McGillT. E.DewsburyD. E.SachsB. (Eds.), Sex and behavior: status and prospectus. New York: Plenum. Pp. 317–336.
54.
WitkinH. A.AschS. E. (1948) Studies in space orientation. IV. Further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 762–782.
55.
YenW. M. (1975) Sex-linked major-gene influences on selected types of spatial performance. Behavior Genetics, 5, 281–298.
