Previous research has suggested that a singly presented facial stimulus having a direct gaze holds spatial attention. This study examined whether facial stimulus having a direct gaze can also capture spatial attention in a relative dot-probe paradigm (facial stimulus having a direct gaze was presented concurrently with that having an averted gaze). The results showed that participants oriented their spatial attention to a facial stimulus having a direct gaze rather than to that with an averted gaze. This attentional bias depended on gaze-perception mechanisms as observed in the lack of attentional bias to a direct gaze from unnatural-looking eyes (i.e., white pupil/iris and black sclera). These findings raise the possibility that the attentional effect implicated in the perception of a direct gaze is induced regardless of the stimulus context.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsR. B.Jr.FranklinR. G.Jr. (2009) Influence of emotional expression on the processing of gaze direction. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 106–112. DOI: 10.1007/S11031-009-9121-9.
2.
AdamsR. B.Jr.KleckR. E. (2003) Perceived gaze direction and the processing of facial displays of emotion. Psychological Science, 14, 644–647. DOI: 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1479.x.
3.
AdamsR. B.Jr.KleckR. E. (2005) Effects of direct and averted gaze on the perception of facially communicated emotion. Emotion, 5, 3–11. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.3.
4.
ArgyleM.CookM. (1976) Gaze and mutual gaze. New York: Cambridge Univer. Press.
5.
BarlowH. B.ReevesB. C. (1979) The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays. Vision Research, 19, 783–793. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(79)90154-8.
6.
BatkiA.Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS.ConnellanJ.AhluwaliaJ. (2000) Is there an innate gaze module? Evidence from human neonates. Infant Behavior and Development, 23, 223–229. DOI: 10.1016/S0163-6383(01)00037-6.
7.
BradleyB. P.MoggK.FallaS.HamiltonL. R. (1998) Attentional bias for threatening facial expressions in anxiety: Manipulations of stimulus duration. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 737–753. DOI: 10.1080/026999398379411.
8.
BradleyB. P.MoggK.MillarN. H. (2000) Covert and overt orientation of attention to emotional faces in anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 789–808. DOI: 10.1080/026999 30050156636.
9.
BrainardD. H. (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. DOI: 10.1163/ 156856897X00357.
10.
BroschT.SanderD.SchererK. R. (2007) That baby caught my eye: Attention capture by infant faces. Emotion, 7, 685–689. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.685.
11.
ContyL.GimmigD.BelletierC.GeorgeN.HuguetP. (2010) The cost of being watched: Stroop interference increases under concomitant eye contact. Cognition, 115, 133–139. DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.12.005.
12.
ContyL.RussoM.LoehrV.HuguevilleL.BarbuS.HuguetP.TijusC.GeorgeN. (2010) The mere perception of eye contact increases arousal during a word-spelling task. Social Neuroscience, 5, 171–186. DOI: 10.1080/17470910903227507.
13.
ContyL.TijusC.HuguevilleL.CoelhoE.GeorgeN. (2006) Searching for asymmetries in the detection of gaze contact versus averted gaze under different head views: A behavioural study. Spatial Vision, 19, 529–545. DOI: 10.1163/156856806779194026.
14.
CossR. G. (1970) Perceptual aspects of eye-spot patterns and their relevance to gaze behaviour. In HuttS. J.HuttC. (Eds.), Behaviour studies in -psychiatry. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press. Pp. 121–147.
15.
DoiH.UedaK. (2007) Searching for a perceived stare in the crowd. Perception, 36, 773–780. DOI: 10.1068/p5614.
DuffyE. (1957) The psychological significance of the concept of “arousal” or “activation.”Psychological Review, 64, 265–275. DOI: 10.1037/h0048837.
18.
EllsworthP. C.CarlsmithJ. M. (1973) Eye contact and gaze aversion in aggressive encounter. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 117–122. DOI: 10.1037/h0035779.
19.
FarroniT.CsibraG.SimionF.JohnsonM. H. (2002) Eye contact detection in humans from birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 9602–9605. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.152159999.
20.
FriesenC. K.KingstoneA. (1998) The eyes have it: Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 490–493.
21.
FrischenA.BaylissA. P.TipperS. P. (2007) Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 694–724. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694.
22.
GaleA.KingsleyE.BrookesS.SmithD. (1978) Cortical arousal and social intimacy in the human female under different conditions of eye contact. Behaivioural Process, 3, 271–275. DOI: 10.1016/0376-6357(78)90019-0.
23.
GaleA.SprattG.ChapmanA. J.SmallboneA. (1975) EEG correlates of eye contact and interpersonal distance. Biological Psychology, 3, 237–245. DOI: 10.1016/0301-0511(75)90023-X.
24.
GeorgeN.ContyL. (2008) Facing the gaze of others. Neurophysiologie Clinique / Clinical Neurophysiology, 38, 197–207. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2008.03.001.
25.
HietanenJ. K. (1999) Does your gaze direction and head orientation shift my visual attention?NeuroReport, 10, 3443–3447.
26.
HietanenJ. K.LeppänenJ. M.PeltolaM. J.Linna-AhoK.RuuhialaH. J. (2008) Seeing direct and averted gaze activates the approach-avoidance motivational brain systems. Neuropsychologist, 46, 2423–2430. DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.029.
27.
JuleszB. (1971) Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press.
28.
KampeK.FrithC. D.FrithU. (2003) “Hey John”: Signals conveying communicative intention towards the self activate brain regions associated with “metalizing” regardless of modality. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 5258–5263.
29.
KirkR. E. (1995) Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. (3rd ed.) Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
30.
KleinkeC. L. (1986) Gaze and eye contact: A research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 78–100. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.78.
31.
LangnerO.DotschR.BijlstraG.WigboldusD. H. T.HawkS. T.van KnippenbergA. (2010) Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1377–1388. DOI: 10.1080/02699930903485076.
32.
LangtonS. R. H.BruceV. (1999) Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others. Visual Cognition, 6, 541–567. DOI: 10.1080/135062899394939.
33.
LippO. V.DerakshanN. (2005) Attentional bias to pictures of fear-relevant animals in a dot probe task. Emotion, 5, 365–369. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.365.
MacLeodC.MathewsA.TataP. (1986) Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15–20. DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.95.1.15.
36.
MacLeodC. M. (1991) Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.
37.
MoggK.BradleyB. P. (1999) Orienting of attention to threatening facial expressions presented under conditions of restricted awareness. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 713–740. DOI: 10.1080/026999399379050.
38.
MüllerH. J.RabbittP. M. A. (1989) Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 315–330. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.15.2.315.
39.
NicholsK. A.ChampnessB. G. (1971) Eye gaze and the GSR. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 623–626. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1031(71)90024-2.
40.
ÖhmanA.MinekaS. (2001) Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483–522. DOI: 10.1037//0033-295X.108.3.483.
41.
PalmerT.VergheseP.PavelM. (2000) The psychophysics of visual search. Vision Research, 40, 1227–1268. DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00244-8.
42.
PelliD. G. (1997) The Video Toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442. DOI: 10.1163/156856897X00366.
43.
PerrettD.EmeryN. J. (1994) Understanding the intentions of others from visual signals: Neuropsychological evidence. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 13, 683–694.
44.
PutmanP.HermansE.van HonkJ. (2006) Anxiety meets fear in perception of dynamic expressive gaze. Emotion, 6, 94–102. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.94.
45.
RicciardelliP.BaylissG.DriverJ. (2000) The positive and negative of human expertise in gaze perception. Cognition, 77, B1–B14. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00092-5.
46.
RosenholtzR. (1999) A simple saliency model predicts a number of motion popout phenomena. Vision Research, 39, 3157–3163. DOI: 10.1016 / S0042-6989(99)00077-2.
SenjuA.HasegawaT. (2006) Do the upright eyes have it?Psychonomic Bulletin, & Review, 13, 223–228.
49.
SenjuA.HasegawaT.TojoY. (2005) Does perceived direct gaze boost detection in adults and children with and without autism? The stare-in-the-crowd effect revisited. Visual Cognition, 12, 1474–1496. DOI: 10.1080/13506280444000797.
50.
SenjuA.JohnsonM. H. (2009) The eye contact effect: Mechanisms and development. Trends in Cognitive Science, 13, 127–134. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.009.
51.
TreismanA.GormicanS. (1988) Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15–48. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.1.15.
52.
TreismanA.SoutherJ. (1985) Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 285–310. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.114.3.285.
53.
von GrünauM.AnstonC. (1995) The detection of gaze direction: A stare-in-the-crowd effect. Perception, 24, 1297–1313. DOI: 10.1068/p241297.
54.
WirthJ. H.SaccoD. F.HugenbergK.WilliamsK. D. (2010) Eye gaze as relational evaluation: Averted eye gaze leads to feelings of ostracism and relational devaluation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 869–882. DOP10.1177/0146167210370032.
55.
WolfeJ. M. (1994) Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202–238.
