The usefulness of the five-repetition sit-to-stand (FRSTS) test was assessed with older patients in a home-care setting. Records of 45 patients (≥ 65 years old) were examined for information on FRSTS test performance. 5 patients were excluded. 23 patients were unable to complete the test. For the 17 able to complete the FRSTS test, the time required was statistically significantly greater than age-stratified norms. For patients treated in a home-care setting, inability to complete the FRSTS test clearly underscores the test's limitations and the need for alternatives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BohannonR. W. (2006) Reference values for the five-repetition sit-to-stand test: A descriptive meta-analysis of data from elders. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 103, 215–222.
2.
BohannonR. W.SmithJ.HullD.PalmeriD.BarnhardR. (1995) Deficits in lower extremity muscle and gait performance among renal transplant candidates. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 76, 547–551.
3.
EriksrudO.BohannonR. W. (2003) Relationship of knee extension force to independence in sit-to-stand performance in patients receiving acute rehabilitation. Physical Therapy, 83, 544–551.
4.
ForrestK. Y. Z.ZmudaJ. M.CauleyJ. A. (2006) Correlates of decline in lower extremity performance in older women: A 10-year follow-up study. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 61A, 1194–1200.
5.
GuralnikJ. M.SimonsickE. M.FerrucciL.GlynnR. J.BerkmanL. F.BlazerD. C.ScherrP. A.WallaceR. B. (1994) A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: Association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 49, M85–M94.
6.
JonesC. J.RikliR. E.BeamW. C. (1999) A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70, 113–119.
7.
LordS. R.MurrayS. M.ChapmanK.MunroB.TiedemannA. (2002) Sit-to-stand performance depends on sensation, speed, balance, and psychological status in addition to strength in older people. Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences, 57, M539–M543.
8.
OstirG. V.VolpatoS.FriedL. P.ChavesP.GuralnikJ. M. (2002) Reliability and sensitivity to change assessed for a summary measure of lower body function: Results from the Women's Health and Aging Study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55, 916–921.
9.
PenninxB. W. J. H.FerrucciL.LeveilleS. G.RantanenT.PahorM.GuralnikJ. M. (2000) Lower extremity performance in nondisabled older persons as a predictor of subsequent hospitalization. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 55A, M691–M697.
10.
SchaubertK.BohannonR. W. (2005a) Reliability of the sit-to-stand test over dispersed test sessions. Isokinetics and Exercise Science, 13, 119–122.
11.
SchaubertK. L.BohannonR. W. (2005b) Reliability and validity of three strength measures obtained from community-dwelling elderly persons. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19, 717–720.
12.
SimmondsM. J. (2002) Physical function in patients with cancer: Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of a physical performance test battery. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 24, 404–414.
13.
WolinskyF. D.MillerD. K.AndresenE. M.MalmstromT. K.MillerJ. P. (2005) Reproducibility of physical performance and physiological assessments. Journal of Aging and Health, 17, 111–124.
