Using a pretest-posttest design, Srinivasan, et al. (2013) found that a period of interaction between children and an Isobot humanoid robot improved performance on standardized measures of imitation, planning, and execution of motor behaviors. The authors conducted their study with 15 typically developing children (9 boys, 6 girls) and 1 boy with autism. All participants were between the ages of 4 and 7 years. While considerations of gender expectations, norms, and appearance are now considered critical to social interactions between humans and robots by most researchers in the field of human-robot interactions, Srinivasan et al. did not consider these effects. This paper proposes that gender could have significant effects on the results of future work conducted in this area.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AttwoodA. (2007) The complete guide to Asperger's syndrome. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
2.
BreazealC. L. (2004) Designing sociable robots. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
BumbyK.DautenhahnK. (1999) Investigating children's attitudes towards robots: a case study. In CoxK.GorayskaB.MarshJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Cognitive Technology Conference (CT99). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State Univer. M.I.N.D. Lab. Pp. 391–410.
4.
CarpenterJ.DavisJ. M.Erwin-StewartN.LeeT. R.BransfordJ. D.VyeN. (2009) Gender representation and humanoid robots designed for domestic use. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(3), 261–265.
5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014) Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years: autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2010: surveillance summaries. Retrieved November 9, 2014, from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6302al.htm?s_cid=ss6302al_w.
6.
DeruelleC.RondanC.Salle-CollemicheX.Bastard-RossetD.Da FonsécaD. (2008) Attention to low- and high-spatial frequencies in categorizing facial identities, emotions and gender in children with autism. Brain and Cognition, 66(2), 115–123.
7.
DeutschF. M. (2007) Undoing gender. Gender & Society, 21(1), 106–127.
8.
de VriesA. L.NoensI. L.Cohen-KettenisP. T.van Berckelaer-OnnesI. A.DoreleijersT. A. (2010) Autism spectrum disorders in gender dysphoric children and adolescents. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(8), 930–936.
9.
DuquetteA.MichaudF.MercierH. (2008) Exploring the use of a mobile robot as an imitation agent with children with low-functioning autism. Autonomous Robots, 24(2), 147–157.
10.
EysselF.KuchenbrandtD.BobingerS. (2011) Effects of anticipated human-robot interaction and predictability of robot behavior on perceptions of anthropomorphism. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. New York: Association for Computer Machining. Pp. 61–68.
11.
FongT.NourbakhshI.DautenhahnK. (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3), 143–166.
12.
GoetzJ.KieslerS.PowersA. (2003) Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2003), Milbrae, CA, October 31-November 2. Pp. 55–60.
13.
HindsP. J.RobertsT. L.JonesH. (2004) Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1), 151–181.
14.
JohnsonJ. (2003) Children, robotics, and education. Artificial Life and Robotics, 7(1–2), 16–21.
15.
KimY. S.LeventhalB. L.KohY. J.FombonneE.LaskaE.LimE. C.GrinkerR. R. (2011) Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders in a total population sample. American Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 904–912.
16.
KirkovskiM.EnticottB.FitzgeraldP. (2013) A review of the role of female gender in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(11), 2584–2603.
17.
KuoI. H.RabindramJ. M.BroadbentE.LeeY. I.KerseN.StaffordR. M. Q.MacDonaldB. A. (2009) Age and gender factors in user acceptance of healthcare robots. Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Toyama, Japan, September 27-October 2. Pp. 214–218.
18.
MartinC. L.RubleD. (2004) Children's search for gender cues: cognitive perspectives on gender development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(2), 67–70.
19.
MattilaM. L.KielinenM.LinnaS. L.JussilaK.EbelingH.BloiguR.MoilanenI. (2011) Autism spectrum disorders according to DSM-IV-TR and comparison with DSM–5 draft criteria: an epidemiological study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 50(6), 583–592.
20.
NassC.MoonY. (2010) Machines and mindlessness: social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81–103.
21.
PiernoA. C.MariM.LusherD.CastielloU. (2008) Robotic movement elicits visuomotor priming in children with autism. Neuropsychologia, 46(2), 448–454.
22.
ReevesB.NassC. (1996) The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Stanford, CA: Center for the Studies of Language and Information Publications.
23.
RobinsB.DautenhahnK.te BoekhorstR.BillardA. (2004) Effects of repeated exposure to a humanoid robot on children with autism. In KeatesS.ClarksonJ.LangdonP.RobinsonP. (Eds.), Designing a more inclusive world. London, UK: Springer. Pp. 225–236.
24.
RobinsB.DautenhahnK.te BoekhorstR.BillardA. (2005) Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills?Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(2), 105–120.
25.
SchermerhornP.ScheutzM.CrowellC. R. (2008) Robot social presence and gender: do females view robots differently than males?Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction. New York: Association for Computer Machining. Pp. 263–270.
26.
SidnerC. L.KiddC. D.LeeC.LeshN. (2004) Where to look: a study of human-robot engagement. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. New York: Association for Computer Machining. Pp. 78–84.
27.
SiegelM.BreazealC.NortonM. I. (2009) Persuasive robotics: the influence of robot gender on human behavior. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS ′09), St. Louis, MO, October 10–15. Pp. 2563–2568.
28.
SiinoR. M.HindsP. J. (2005) Robots, gender & sensemaking: sex segregation's impact on workers making sense of a mobile autonomous robot. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2005), Barcelona, Spain, April 18–22. Pp. 2773–2778.
29.
SrinivasanS.LynchK.BubelaD.GiffordT.BhatA. (2013) Effect of interactions between a child and a robot on the imitation and praxis performance of typically developing children and one child with autism: a preliminary study. Perceptual & Motor Skills: Physical Development and Measurement, 116(3), 885–904.
30.
ThorneB. (1992) Girls and boys together … but mostly apart: gender arrangements in elementary schools. In WrigleyJ. (Ed.), Education and gender equality. London, UK: Falmer Press. Pp. 115–130.
31.
VivantiG.NadigA.OzonoffS.RogersS. J. (2008) What do children with autism attend to during imitation tasks?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101(3), 186–205.
32.
Weaver-HightowerM. (2003) The “boy turn” in research on gender and education. Review of Educational Research, 73(4), 471–498.
33.
WerryI.DautenhahnK.OgdenB.HarwinW. (2001) Can social interaction skills be taught by a social agent? The role of a robotic mediator in autism therapy. In BeynonM.NehanivC. L.DautenhahnK. (Eds.), Cognitive technology: instruments of mind. Berlin & Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. Pp. 57–74.
34.
WoodsS.DautenhahnK.SchultzJ. (2006) Exploring the design space of robots: children's perspectives. Interacting with Computers, 18(6), 1390–1418.
35.
WorleyJ. A.MatsonJ. L. (2011) Psychiatric symptoms in children diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder: an examination of gender differences. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5(3), 1086–1091.
