This study examined relations of achievement goals of writers who are speakers of English as a foreign language (EFL), the frequency of their writing strategy use, and the quality of their writing from a multiple goals perspective. The goal profiles of 57 EFL college students with similar writing proficiency were based on rating items of an unpublished scale; Group 1 had strong mastery and strong performance–approach goals, and two groups included students with only one strong mastery (Group 2) or performance (Group 3) goal. Think-aloud protocols indicated that the participants adopted 21 strategies in an argumentative writing task, classified into five categories. Group 1 was found to use writing strategies of monitoring or evaluating, revising, and compensating significantly more often than the other two groups, and produced better essays. Strong mastery and performance-approach goals might be beneficial for EFL college writers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmesC. (1992) Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.
2.
AmesC.ArcherJ. (1988) Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivational process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267.
3.
BagozziR. P.YiY. (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94.
4.
BereiterC.BirdM. (1985) Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 131–156.
5.
BereiterC.ScardamaliaM. (1987) The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
BosherS. (1998) The composing processes of three Southeast Asian writers at the post-secondary level: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 205–241.
7.
CummingA. (1989) Writing expertise and second language proficiency. Language Learning, 39, 81–141.
8.
CummingA.BuschM.ZhouA. (2002) Investigating learners' goals in the context of adult second-language writing. In RansdellS.BarbierM. (Eds.), New directions for research in L2 writing. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Pp. 189–208.
9.
de LariosJ. R.MarínJ.MurphyL. (2001) A temporal analysis of formulation processes in L1 and L2 writing. Language Learning, 51, 497–538.
10.
Educational Testing Service. (1996) Test of written English guide. (4th ed.) Princeton, NJ: Author.
11.
ElliotA. J.McGregorH. A.GableS. (1999) Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 549–563.
12.
EricssonK. A.SimonH. A. (1993) Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
HallC. (1990) Managing the complexity of revision across languages. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 245–266.
14.
HarackiewiczJ. M.BarronK. E.TauerJ. M.ElliotA. J. (2002) Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 562–575.
15.
HarackiewiczJ. M.LinnenbrinkE. A. (2005) Multiple achievement goals and multiple pathways for learning: The agenda and impact of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40, 75–84.
16.
HayesJ. R.FlowerL. S. (1983) Uncovering cognitive processes in writing: An introduction to protocol analysis. In MosenthalP.TamarL.WalmsleyS. A. (Eds.), Researching in writing. New York: Longman. Pp. 206–220.
17.
HeT-H. (2005) Effects of mastery and performance goals on the composition strategy use of adult EFL writers. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 407–431.
18.
HeT-H. (2008) Reading for different goals: The interplay of EFL college students' multiple goals, reading strategy use, and reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 224–242.
19.
HuL-T.BentlerP. M. (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
KaplanA.MiddletonM. J.UrdanT.MidgleyC. (2002) Achievement goals and goal structures. In MidgleyC. (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 21–53.
22.
LeiX. (2008) Exploring a sociocultural approach to writing strategy research: Mediated actions in writing activities. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 217–236.
23.
LekiI. (1995) Coping strategies of ESL students in writing tasks across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 235–260.
24.
LinnenbrinkE. A. (2005) The dilemma of performance–approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students' motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 197–213.
25.
McDonoughS. (1999) Learner strategies. Language Teaching, 32, 1–18.
26.
MeeceJ. L.BlumenfeldP. C.HoyleR. H. (1988) Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514–523.
27.
MidgleyC.KaplanA.MiddletonM. (2001) Performance–approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost?Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77–86.
28.
MidgleyC.KaplanA.MiddletonM.MaehrM. L.UrdanT.AndermanL. H.AndermanE.RoeserR. (1998) The development and validation of scales assessing students' achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 113–131.
29.
NichollsJ. (1984) Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychology Review, 91, 328–346.
30.
NolenA. B. (1988) Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 269–287.
31.
NunnallyJ. (1978) Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
32.
PintrichP. R. (2000) Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555.
33.
PorteG. K. (1997) The etiology of poor second language writing: The influence of perceived teacher preferences on second language revision strategies. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 61–78.
34.
RaimesA. (1985) What unskilled ESL students do as they write: A classroom study of composing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 229–258.
35.
RaimesA. (1987) Language proficiency, writing ability, and composing strategies: A study of ESL college students. Language Learning, 37, 439–465.
36.
SasakiM. (2000) Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 259–291.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007) Using multivariate statistics. (5th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
39.
WhalenK.MenardN. (1995) L1 and L2 writers' strategic and linguistic knowledge: A model of multiple-level discourse processing. Language Learning, 45, 381–418.
40.
ZamelV. (1983) The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 165–187.
41.
ZamelV. (1984) In search of the key: Research and practice in composition. In HandscombeJ.OremR.TaylorB. P. (Eds.), On TESOL '83: The questions of control. Washington, DC: TESOL. Pp. 195–207.
