The aim of this study was to compare the learning process of a highly complex ballet skill following demonstrations of point-light and video models. 16 participants divided into point-light and video groups (ns = 8) performed 160 trials of a pirouette, equally distributed in blocks of 20 trials, alternating periods of demonstration and practice, with a retention test a day later. Measures of head and trunk oscillation, coordination disparity from the model, and movement time difference showed similarities between video and point-light groups; ballet experts' evaluations indicated superiority of performance in the video over the point-light group. Results are discussed in terms of the task requirements of dissociation between head and trunk rotations, focusing on the hypothesis of sufficiency and higher relevance of information contained in biological motion models applied to learning of complex motor skills.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Al-AboodS. A.DavidsK.BennettS. J. (2001) Specificity of task constraints and effects of visual demonstrations and verbal instructions in directing learners' search during skill acquisition. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 295–305.
2.
BertenthalB.ProffittD.CuttingJ. (1984) Infant sensitivity to figural coherence in biomechanical motion. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 213–230.
3.
BlakeR.ShiffrarM. (2007) Perception of human motion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 47–73.
4.
BouquetC. A.GaurierT.ShipleyT.ToussaintL.BlandinY. (2007) Influence of the perception of biological or non-biological motion on movement execution. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 519–530.
5.
CuttingJ. E.KozlowskiL. (1977) Recognising friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 353–356.
6.
DenardiR. A.FerracioliM. C.RodriguesS. T. (2008) Informação visual e controle postural durante a execução da pirouette no ballet. Revista Portuguesa de Ciências do Desporto, 8, 241–250.
7.
FaniL.PrasadS.HarberK.ShiffrarM. (2005) Recognizing people from their movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 210–220.
8.
FoxR.McDanielC. (1982) The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science, 218, 486–487.
9.
GieseM. A.PoggioT. (2003) Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 179–192.
10.
GrayJ. T.NeisserU.ShapiroB. A.KounsS. (1991) Observational learning of ballet sequences: The role of kinematic information. Ecological Psychology, 3, 121–134.
11.
HayesS. J.HodgesN. J.ScottM. A.HornR. R.WilliamsA. M. (2007) The efficacy of demonstrations in teaching children an unfamiliar movement skill: The effects of object-orientated actions and point-light demonstrations. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 559–575.
12.
HodgesN. J.WilliamsA. M.HayesS. J.BreslinG. (2007) What is modelled during observational learning?Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 531–545.
13.
HornR. R.WilliamsA. M.ScottM. A. (2002) Learning from demonstrations: The role of visual search during observational learning from video and point-light models. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 253–269.
14.
HornR. R.WilliamsA. M.ScottM. A.HodgesN. J. (2005) Visual search and coordination changes in response to video and point-light demonstrations without KR. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 265–274.
15.
JohanssonG. (1973) Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201–211.
16.
MaY.PatersonH. M.PollickF. E. (2006) A motion capture library for the study of identity, gender and emotion perception from biological motion. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 134–141.
17.
MatherG.RadfordK.WestS. (1992) Low-level visual processing of biological motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London B: Biological Sciences, 249, 149–155.
18.
MaxwellS. E.DelaneyH. D. (1990) Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
19.
MullineauxD. R.BartlettR. M.BennettS. (2001) Research design and statistics in biomechanics and motor control. Journal of Sports Sciences, 19, 739–760.
20.
NewellK. M. (1985) Coordination, control and skill. In GoodmanD.WilbergR. B.FranksI. M. (Eds.), Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory and control. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Pp. 295–317.
21.
NewellK. M.WalterC. B. (1981) Kinematic and kinetic parameters as information feedback in motor skill acquisition. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 7, 235–254.
22.
NormanJ. F.PaytonS. M.LongJ. R.HawkesL. M. (2004) Aging and the perception of biological motion. Psychology and Aging, 19, 219–225.
23.
PavlovaM.Krägeloh-MannI.SokolovA.BirbaumerN. (2001) Recognition of point-light biological motion displays by young children. Perception, 30, 925–933.
24.
PellecchiaG. L.GarrettG. E. (1997) Assessing lumbar stabilization from point-light and normal video displays of manual lifting. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85, 931–937.
25.
PintoJ.ShiffrarM. (1999) Subconfigurations of the human form in the perception of biological motion displays. Acta Psychologica, 102, 293–318.
26.
PollickF. E.KayJ. W.HeimK.StringerR. (2005) Gender recognition from point-light walkers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1247–1265.
27.
RomackJ. L. (1995) Observational learning and acquisition of complex motor patterns by children: A perception/action approach. Unpublished doctorial thesis, International Institute for Sport and Human Performance, Univer. of Oregon, Eugene.
28.
RosayM. (1980) Dicionário de ballet. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Nórdica.
29.
RunesonS. (1984) Perception of biological motion: The KSD principle and the implications of a distal versus proximal approach. In JanssonG.BergstomS.EpsteinW. (Eds.), Perceiving events and objects. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 383–405.
30.
ScullyD. M. (1986) Visual perception of aesthetic quality and technical execution in biological motion. Human Movement Science, 5, 185–206.
31.
ScullyD. M.CarnegieE. (1998) Observational learning in motor skill acquisition: A look at demonstrations. Irish Journal of Psychology, 19, 472–485.
32.
ScullyD. M.NewellK. M. (1985) Observational learning and the acquisition of motor skills: Towards a visual perception perspective. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 11, 169–186.
33.
SidawayB.HeiseG.Schoenfelder-ZhodiB. (1995) Quantifying the variability of angle: Angle plots. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 29, 181–197.
34.
TrojeN. F.WesthoffC.LavrovM. (2005) Person identification from biological motion: Effects of structural and kinematic cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 667–675.
35.
VanrieJ.VerfaillieK. (2004) Perception of biological motion: A stimulus set of human point-light actions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 625–629.
36.
WilliamsJ. G. (1988) Perception of throwing action from point-light demonstrations. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67, 273–274.
37.
WinterD. A. (1990) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. (2nd ed.) New York: Wiley.
