Motivational Orientations and Task Autonomy Fit: Effects on Organizational Attraction

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to investigate whether there is congruence between applicant needs (i.e., motivational orientations) and what is available (i.e., task autonomy) from an organizational perspective based on the fit between needs and supply. The fit between work motivation and task autonomy was examined to see whether it was associated with organizational attraction. This experimental study included two phases. Phase 1 participants consisted of 446 undergraduate students, of whom 228 were recruited to participate in Phase 2. The fit relations between task autonomy and intrinsic motivation and between task control and extrinsic motivation were characterized. Findings indicated that the fit between work motivation and task autonomy was positively associated with organizational attraction. Based on these results, it may be inferred that employers should emphasize job characteristics such as autonomy or control orientations to attract individuals, and focus on the most suitable work motivations for their organizations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amabile

T. M.

Hill

K. G.

Hennessey

B. A.

Tighe

(1994) The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950–967.

Brief

A. P.

Aldag

R. J.

(1977) The intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: Toward conceptual clarity. The Academy of Management Review, 2, 496–500.

Cable

D. M.

DeRue

D. S.

(2002) The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 822–834.

Cable

D. M.

Judge

T. A.

(1994) Pay preferences and job search decisions: A person-organization fit perspective. Personnel Psychology, 47, 317–348.

Cable

D. M.

Judge

T. A.

(1997) Interviewer's perceptions of person-organization fit and organizational selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 546–561.

Caplan

R. D.

(1987) Person-environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 248–267.

Hackman

J. R.

(1980) Work redesign and motivation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 11, 445–455.

Hackman

J. R.

Oldham

G. R.

(1975) Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159–170.

Hackman

J. R.

Oldham

G. R.

(1976) Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–279.

10.

Hoffman

B. J.

Woehr

D. J.

(2006) A quantitative review of the relationship between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 389–399.

11.

Honeycutt

T. L.

Rosen

(1997) Family friendly human resource policies, salary levels, and salient identity as predictors of organizational attraction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 271–290.

12.

Idaszak

J. R.

Drasgow

(1987) A revision of the Job Diagnostic Survey: Elimination of a measurement artifact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 69–74.

13.

Kristof

A. L.

(1996) Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49.

14.

Kristof-Brown

A. L.

Zimmerman

R. D.

Johnson

E. C.

(2005) Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.

15.

Locke

E. A.

Latham

G. P.

(2004) What should we do about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century. Academy of Management Review, 29, 388–403.

16.

Miner

J. B.

(2006) Role motivation theories. In Thomas

J. C.

Segal

D. L.

Hersen

(Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of personality and psychopathology. Vol. 1. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Pp. 1233–1250.

17.

Muchinsky

P. M.

Monahan

C. J.

(1987) What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 268–277.

18.

Nunnally

(1978) Psychometric theory. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.

19.

Pinder

C. C.

(1998) Work motivation in organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

20.

Rau

B. L.

Hyland

M. M.

(2002) Role conflict and flexible work arrangements: The effects on applicant attraction. Personnel Psychology, 55, 111–136.

21.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

22.

Schein

V. E.

Diamante

(1988) Organizational attraction and the person-environment fit. Psychological Reports, 62, 167–173.

23.

Thoms

Chinn

S. J.

Goodrich

Howard

(2004) Designing personable and informative job recruiting web sites: Testing the effect of the design on attractiveness and intent to apply. Psychological Reports, 94, 1031–1042.

24.

Verquer

M. L.

Beehr

T. A.

Wagner

S. H.

(2003) A meta-analysis of relations between person-organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 473–489.

25.

Wheeler

A. R.

Gallagher

V. C.

Brouer

R. L.

Sablynski

C. J.

(2007) When person–organization (mis)fit and (dis)satisfaction lead to turnover: The moderating role of perceived job mobility. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 203–219.