Anderson, J. M. (1981). Effects of tape-recorded models on sight-reading and performance skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 23–30.
2.
Brittin, R.V. (1993). Effects of upper register and lower register accompaniment on intonation. Journal of Band Research, 29 (1), 43–50.
3.
Brittin, R. V. (2000). Children's preference for sequenced accompaniments: The influence of style and perceived tempo. Journal of Research in Music Education, 4, 237–248.
4.
Brittin, R. V. (2001). Preferences for children's music: Effects of sequenced accompaniments, school culture, and media association. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 147, 40–45.
5.
Feldstein, S., Be Clark, L. (2001). The Yamaha advantage: Musicianship from day one.New York: Carl Fischer.
6.
Geringer, J. M. (1998). Musicians' ratings of good versus bad vocal and string performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 522–534.
7.
Kantorski, V.J. (1986). String instrument intonation in upper and lower register: The effects of accompaniment. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 200–210.
8.
Karrick, B. (1998). An examination of the intonation tendencies of wind instrumentalists based on their performances of selected harmonic intervals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 112–127.
9.
Lautzenheiser, T., Higgins, J., Menghini, C., Lavender, P., Rhodes, T. C., & Bierschenk, D. (2000). Director's information guide to Essential Elements 2000. Milwaukee, WI: Hal Leonard.
10.
Le Blanc, A., Colman, J., Mc Crary, J., Sherrill, C., & Malin, S. (1988). Tempo preferences of different age music listeners. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 156–168.
11.
Linklater, F. (1997). Effects of audio- and videotape models on performance achievement of beginning clarinetists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 402–414.
12.
Madsen, C. K., Geringer, J. M., & Heller, J. (1991). Comparison of good versus bad intonation of accompanied and unaccompanied vocal and string performances using a continuous response digital interface (CRDI). Canadian Music Educator: Special Research Edition, 33, 123–130.
13.
Madsen, C. K., Geringer, J. M., & Heller, J. (1993). Comparison of good versus bad tone quality of accompanied and unaccompanied vocal and string performances. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 119, 93–100.
14.
Music Educators National Conference (MENC). (1996). Performance standards for music: Grades pre K-12. Reston, VA: Author.
15.
O'Reilly, J., & Williams, M. (1997). Accent on achievement, Book 1: Conductors score.Van Nuys, CA: Alfred Publishing.
16.
Ouren, R. W. (1997). The influence of the Vivace accompaniment technology on selected middle school instrumental students (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 2456A.
17.
Sheldon, D., Reese, S., & Grashel, J. (1999). The effects of live accompaniment, intelligent digital accompaniment, and no accompaniment on musicians' performance quality. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 251–265.
18.
Snapp, D. R. (1997). The uses and effectiveness of the Vivace Intelligent Accompaniment system in K-12 instrumental music programs (Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 766A.
19.
Tseng, S. A. (1996). Solo accompaniment in instrumental music education: The impact of the computer-controlled Vivace on flute student practice (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 1536A.
20.
Zurcher, W. (1975). The effect of model-supportive practice on beginning brass instrumentalists. In C. K. Madsen, R. D. Greer, & C. H. Madsen (Eds.), Research in music behavior: Modifying music behavior in the classroom (pp. 131–138). New York: Teachers College Press.