The effect upon fine tuning of four contextual melodic factors: timbre, intensity, duration, and variable stimulation, has been examined. Students listened to 108 ascending scale passages followed by an extended tone which they tuned to the implied tonic of the passage. It was concluded that all four contextual factors have significant effects on tuning, and that there is a strong tendency for subjects to be influenced by the initial frequency of the tuning tone. It was also found that higher intensities produce tunings of lower frequencies and that horn timbre is easiest to tune accurately and violin is the most difficult.
Bartlett, F., Remembering (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1932).
2.
Buffum, H. S., An unpublished experiment performed sometime prior to 1910, and described in C. E. Seashore, “The Measurement of Pitch Discrimination: A Preliminary Report,”Psychological Monographs, Vol. 13 (1910), pp. 21–60.
3.
Cameron, E. H., “Effects of Practice in the Discrimination and Singing of Tones”, Psychological Monographs, Vol. 23, No. 100 (1917), pp. 159–180.
4.
Capurso, A. A., “The Effect of an Associative Technique in Teaching Pitch and Interval Discrimination”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 18 (1934), pp. 811–818.
5.
Connette, E., “The Effect of Practice with Knowledge of Results”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 7 (1941), pp. 523–532.
6.
Divenyi, P., The Rhythmic Perception of Micro-Melodies: Detectability by Human Observers of a Time Increment Between Sinusoidal Pulses of Two Different, Successive Frequencies, (doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, 1970).
7.
Greer, R. D., “The Effect of'Timbre on Brass-Wind Intonation”, Experimental Research in the Psychology of Music, Vol. 6 (Iowa City, Iowa: University of Iowa Press, 1970), pp. 65–94.
8.
Helmholtz, H. L. F., On the Sensations of Tone as a Psychophysical Basis for the Theory of Music, 4th ed. 1877, A. J. Ellis, translator (New York: Dover Publications, 1954).
9.
Leonard, J., Jr., The Effect of Certain Intrinsic and Contextual Characteristics of Tone-Stimulus on Pitch Discrimination (doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, 1967).
10.
Madsen, C. K., “The Effect of Scale Direction on Pitch Acuity in Solo Vocal Performance”, Journal of Research in Music Education, Vol. 14, (Winter 1966), pp. 266–276.
11.
Miles, W. R., “Accuracy of the Voice in Simple Pitch Singing”, Psychological Monographs, Vol. 17, No. 3 (1914), pp. 13–66.
12.
Moles, A., Information Theory and Esthetic Perception, J. E. Cohen, translator (London: University of Illinois Press, 1966).
13.
Preyer, W. T., Uber die Grezen der Tonwahrnehmung (Jena: n.p., 1876).
14.
Seashore, R. H., “Improvability of Pitch Discrimination”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 32 (1935), p. 546.
15.
Smith, F. O., “The Effect of Training in Pitch Discrimination”, Psychological Monographs, Vol. 16, No. 69 (1914), pp. 67–103.
16.
Vernon, M. D., “The Functions of Schemata in Perceiving”, Psychological Review, Vol. 62 (1955), p. 180.
17.
Werner, H., “Musical ‘Micro-scales’ and ‘Micromelodies,’”Journal of Psychology, Vol. 10 (1940), pp. 149–156.
18.
Whipple, G. M., “Studies in Pitch Discrimination”, American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 14 (1903), pp. 289–309.
19.
Wolner, M., and W. H. Pyle, “An Experiment in Individual Training of Pitch-Deficient Children,”Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 24 (1933), pp. 602–608.
20.
Wyatt, R. F., “Improvability of Pitch Discrimination”, Psychological Monographs, Vol. 58, No. 2 (1945), pp. 1–58.
