Differences in the learning styles of students with and without learning disabilities (LD) at a distance-learning university were examined. Two hundred and twelve students answered self-report questionnaires on their learning styles. Results revealed that students with LD preferred to use more stepwise processing, including memorizing and drilling, than NLD students. In addition, students with LD reported a higher need for self-regulation strategies than their NLD peers, including controlling their learning process, self-orientation, planning, monitoring, and continuous evaluation of their learning process and results. LD students also claimed to lack regulation, noting their difficulties with the learning process. Findings are discussed in relation to how distance-learning universities can better cultivate the abilities of their LD and NLD students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllorJ.H.FuchsD.MathesP.G. (2001). Do students with and without lexical retrieval weakness respond differently to instruction?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 264–275.
2.
AragonS.R.JohnsonS.D.ShaikN. (2002). The influence of learning style preferences on student success in online versus face-to-face environments. American Journal of Distance Education, 16 (4), 227–245.
3.
BoekaertsM. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445–457.
4.
BraxtonJ.M.MilemJ.F.SullivanA.S. (2000). The influence of active learning on the college student departure process. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 569–590.
5.
BrownA.L.BransfordJ.D.FerraraR.A.CompioneJ.C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In FlavellJ.H.MarkmanE.M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 77–166). New York: John Wiley & Sons.)
6.
ClarkeK.LaneA.M. (2005). Seminar and tutorial sessions: A case study evaluating relationships with academic performance and student satisfaction. Journal of Further & Higher Education, 29, 15–24.
7.
CohnP. (1998). Why does my stomach hurt? How individuals with learning disabilities can use cognitive strategies to reduce anxiety and stress at the college level. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 514–516.
8.
DooleyK.LindnerJ.R.DooleyL.M. (2005). Advanced methods in distance education: Applications and practices for educators, trainers and learners. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
9.
DunnR.DunnK. (1993). Teaching secondary students through their individual learning style. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
10.
DunnR.DunnK. (1999). The complete guide to the learning style inservice system. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
DunnR.StevensonJ.M. (1997). Teaching diverse college students to study within a learning-style prescription. College Student Journal, 31 (3), 333–339.
12.
FelderR.M.SilvermanL.K. (1988). Learning styles and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78, 647–681.
13.
FlavellJ.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
14.
GadzellaB.MastenG. (1998). Critical thinking and learning processes for students in two major fields. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25, 256–261.
15.
GreenbaumB.GrahamS.ScalesW. (1996). Adults with learning disabilities: Occupational and social status after college. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 167–173.
16.
Guri-RozenblitzS. (1991). Distance-open learning: Trends and developments as reflected in recent literature. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 83–91.
17.
HatzesN.M. (1996). Factors contributing to the academic outcomes of university students with learning disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
18.
HeimanT.PrecelK. (2003). Students with learning disabilities in higher education: Academic strategies profile. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 248–258.
19.
HendryG.HeinrichP.LyonP.BarrattA.SimpsonJ.HydeS. (2005). Helping students understand their learning styles: Effects on study self efficacy, preference for group work, and group climate. Educational Psychology, 25, 395–412.
20.
JonesG.C.KalivodaK.S.HigbeeJ.L. (1997). College students with attention deficit disorder. National Association of Student Personnel Administrators Journal, 34, 262–274.
21.
LovelaceM.K. (2005). Meta-analysis of experimental research based on the Dunn and Dunn Model. Journal of Educational Research, 98, 176–184.
22.
MartinJ. (2004). Self regulated learning, social cognitive theory, and agency. Educational Psychologist, 39, 135–145.
23.
MatthewsD. (1994). An investigation of students' learning styles in various disciplines in colleges and universities. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 33, 65–74.
24.
MercerC.D.CampbellK.U.MillerM.D.MercerK.D.LaneH.B. (2000). Effects of a reading fluency intervention for middle schoolers with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 199–189.
Ministry of Education. (2003, December). Learning disabilities: Definition and guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Special issues, section 4(2). Jerusalem, Israel: Author.
27.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities (NJCLD). (1998). Learning disabilities: Pre-service preparation of general and special education teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21, 182–186.
28.
Open University Report, 2002 − 2003. (2003). Tel Aviv: The Open University of Israel Press.
29.
ParisS.G. (1988). Models and metaphors of learning strategies. In WeinsteinC.E.GoetzE.T.AlexanderP.A. (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (pp. 299–321). San Diego, CA: Academic.)
30.
ParkerV. (1999). Personal assistance for students with disabilities in HE: The experience of the university of East London. Disability & Society, 14, 483–504.
31.
ReiffH.B.GerberP.J.GinsbergR. (1992). Learning to achieve: Suggestions from adults with learning disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 10, 11–23.
32.
RochfordR.A. (2003). Assessing learning styles to improve the quality of performance of community college students in developmental writing programs: A pilot study. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 27, 665–678.
33.
RubanL.M.McCoachD.B.McGuireJ.M.ReisS.M. (2003). The differential impact of academic self-regulatory methods on academic achievement among university students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 270–286.
34.
RumbleG. (1989). Open learning, distance learning, and the misuse of language. Open Learning, 4, 28–36.
35.
SchunkD.H.ZimmermanB.J. (Eds.). (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self reflective practice. New York: Guilford Press.)
36.
SeveriensS.Ten DamG.VanHout WoltersB. (2001). Stability of processing and regulation strategies: Two longitudinal studies on students' learning. Higher Education, 42, 437–453.
37.
SkogsbergK.ClumpM. (2003). Do psychology and biology majors differ in their study processes and learning styles?College Student Journal, 37, 27–33.
38.
SwansonH.L. (1990). Instruction derived from strategy deficit model: Overview of principles and procedures. In ScruggsT.WongB.Y.L. (Eds.), Intervention research on learning disabilities (pp. 34–65). New York: Springer-Verlag.)
39.
Van ZwanenbergN. (2000). Felder and Silverman's index of learning styles and Honey and Mumford's learning styles questionnaire: How do they compare and do they predict academic performance?Educational Psychology, 20, 365–381.
40.
VermettenY.LodewijksH.VermuntJ. (1999). Consistency and variability of learning strategies in different university courses. Higher Education, 37, 1–21.
41.
VermuntJ. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and regulated learning. Higher Education, 17, 647–683.
42.
VogelS.AdelmanP.B. (1992). The success of college students with learning disabilities: Factors related to educational attainment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 430–441.
43.
WeinertF.E.SchraderF.W.HelmkeA. (1989). Quality of instruction and achievement outcomes. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 13, 895–912.
44.
ZimmermanB.J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In ZimmermanB.J.SchunkD.H. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 1–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.)
45.
ZimmermanB.J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 64–70.
