This study focused on the relationship between both achievement level and diagnostic label and sociometric status and self-image of students in Dutch elementary education. In particular, differences between students with specific learning disabilities (SLD) and students with general learning disabilities (GLD) were studied, in regular as well as in special education. A total of 1,300 students participated, 861 in general and 439 in (separate) special education schools. Students with GLD were more often rejected and had a lower self-image than students with SLD. These results seemed to hold mainly for girls and for students with GLD in general education. No argument in favor of or against inclusive education can be advanced based on the results of this study, but the findings highlight the potential role of low achievement in peers' dislike of girls. Moreover, the results suggest the importance of investigating subgroups of students with LD in future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Oxford, UK: Addison-Wesley.
2.
AlstonP.ParkerS.SeymourJ. (1992). Children, rights, and the law. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
3.
AsherS. R.HymelS.RenshawP. D. (1984). Loneliness in children. Child Development, 55, 1456–1464.
4.
BaehrP. R.GordenkerL. (1992). The United Nations in the 1990s. London: Macmillan.
5.
BakerE. T.WangM. C.WalbergH. J. (1995). The effects of inclusion on learning. Educational Leadership, 52, 33–35.
6.
BakkerJ. T. A. (2002). Kinderen met leerproblemen in de reguliere basisschool [Children with learning disabilities in regular education]. In Van der AalsvoortG. M.RuijssenaarsA. J. J. M. (Eds.), Jonge risicokinderen bij de start van het onderwijs: Een succesvolle aanpak door integratie?Leuven, Belgium: Acco.
7.
BakkerJ. T. A.BosmanA. M. T. (2003). Self-image and peer acceptance of Dutch students in regular and special education. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 5–14.
8.
BakkerJ. T. A.Van de GriendtJ. (1999). Zelfbeeld en sociale status van kinderen met leerproblemen in het regulier en speciaal onderwijs [Self-image and social status of children with learning disabilities in regular and special education]. Tijdschrift voor Orthopedagogiek, 38, 497–511.
9.
BakkerJ. T. A.DenessenE. J. P. G.BosmanA. M. T. (2005). Peer-acceptance and deviant behavior (Manuscript in preparation), Radboud University Nijmegen.
10.
BanerjiM.DaileyR. A. (1995). A study of the effects of an inclusion model on students with specific learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 511–522.
11.
BearG. G.MinkeK. M.GriffinS. M.DeemerS. A. (1998). Achievement-related perceptions of children with learning disabilities and normal achievement group and developmental differences. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 91–104.
12.
BryanT. (1974). Peer popularity of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 31–35.
13.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analyses for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
14.
CoieJ. D.DodgeK. A.CoppotelliH. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570.
15.
ColeC. N.WaldronN.MajdM. (2004). Academic progress of students across inclusive and traditional settings. Mental Retardation, 42, 136–144.
16.
CosdenM.ElliottK.NobleS.KelemenE. (1999). Self-understanding and self-esteem in children with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 279–290.
17.
CrockettJ. B.KauffmanJ. M. (1999). The least restrictive environment. Its origins and interpretation in special education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18.
DumontJ. J. (1990). Dyslexie: theorie, diagnostiek, behandeling. [Dyslexia: theory, assessment, and treatment]. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Lemniscaat.
19.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
20.
ElbaumB. (2002). The self-concept of students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of comparisons across different placements. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 216–226.
21.
Fillipini-GaudianoM. L. (1991). Handicappati nella scuola del'obbligio in provincia di Pesaro-Urbino: Presenza e integratione. Italian Journal of Intellective Impairment, 4, 123–128.
22.
ForlinP.ForlinC. (1996). Legal frameworks for devolution in regular and special education. Australian Journal of Education, 40, 177–189.
23.
ForlinC. I.ForlinP. R. (1998a). The legal implications of including students with disabilities in regular schools. In HauritzM.SampfordC.BlencoweS. (Eds.), Justice for people with disabilities: Assessing legal and institutional responses (pp. 109–126). Brisbane, Australia: Federation Press.
24.
ForlinC.ForlinP. (1998b). Constitutional and legislative framework for inclusive education in Australia. Australian Journal of Education, 42, 204–217.
25.
FredericksonN. L.FurnhamA. F. (1998). Sociometric-status-group classification of mainstreamed children who have moderate learning difficulties: An investigation of personal and environmental factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 772–783.
26.
FrostJ.McKelvieS. (2004). Self-esteem and body satisfaction in male and female elementary school, high school, and university students. Sex Roles, 51, 45–54.
27.
GansA. M.KennyM. C.GhanyD. L. (2003). Comparing the self-concept of students with and without LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 287–295.
28.
GrolnickW. S.RyanR. M. (1990). Self-perceptions, motivation, and adjustment in children with LD: A multiple-group comparison study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 177–184.
29.
HarterS.WhitesellN. R.JunkinL. J. (1998). Similarities and differences in domain-specific and global self-evaluations of learning-disabled, behaviorally disordered, and normally achieving adolescents. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 653–680.
30.
JenkinsJ. R.HeinenA. (1989). Students' preferences for service delivery: Pull out, in-class or integrated models. Exceptional Children, 55, 516–523.
31.
KellyN.NorwichB., (2004). Pupils' perceptions of self and labels: Moderate learning difficulties in regular and special schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 411–435.
32.
KistnerJ. A.GatlinD. (1989a). Sociometric differences between learning-disabled and non-handicapped students: Effects of sex and race. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 118–120.
33.
KistnerJ. A.GatlinD. (1989b). Correlates of peer rejection among children with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 133–140.
34.
KlingK. C.HydeJ. S.ShowersC. J.BuswellB. N. (1999). Gender differences in self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 470–500.
35.
KuhneM.WienerJ. (2000). Stability of social status with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 64–75.
36.
La GrecaA. M.StoneW. L. (1990). Learning disabilities status and achievement: confounding variables in the study of children's social status, self-esteem, and behavioral functioning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 483–490.
37.
LarriveeB. (1985). Effective teaching for successful mainstreaming. New York: Longman.
38.
Le MareL.De la RondeM. (2000). Links among social status, service delivery mode, and service delivery preference in learning disabilities, low-achieving and normally achieving elementary-aged children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 52–62.
39.
MarasP.BrownR. (2000). Effects of different forms of school contact on children's attitudes toward disabled and nondisabled peers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 337–351.
40.
MeijerC. J. W.PescharJ. L.ScheerensJ. (1995). Prikkels [Stimulations]. De Lier, The Netherlands: Academisch Boeken Centrum.
41.
Ministerie van Onderwijs Wetenschappen. (1990). Weer samen naar school. Hoofdlijnennotitie [Together to school again. Main issues]. Den Haag, The Netherlands: SDU.
42.
Ministerie van Onderwijs Cultuur en Wetenschappen. (2000). Voortgangsrapportage Weer Samen Naar School [Continuity report Together to school again]. http://www.minocw.nl.
43.
Ministerie van Onderwijs Cultuur en Wetenschappen. (2003). Vijfde voortgangsrapportage Weer Samen Naar School [Fifth continuity report Together to school again]. http://www.minocw.nl.
44.
OchoaS. V.OlivarezA. (1995). A meta-analysis of peer rating sociometric studies of pupils with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 29, 1–19.
45.
OECD. (1986). Young people with handicaps: The road to adulthood. Paris: Author.
46.
ParkerJ. G.AsherS. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low accepted children at risk?Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357–389.
47.
PeetsmaT.VergeerM.RoeleveldJ.KarstenS. (2001). Inclusion in education: Comparing pupils' development in special and regular education. Educational Review, 53, 125–135.
48.
RenickP. R.HarterS. (1989). Impact of social comparisons on the developing self-perceptions of learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology. 81, 631–638.
49.
RosenbergM. S.BottD.MajsterekD.ChiangB.SimmonsD.GartlandD.WessonC.GrahamS.Smith-MylesB.MillerM.SwansonH. L.BenderW.RiveraD.WilsonR. (1994). Minimum standards for the description of participants in learning disabilities research. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 56–59.
50.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (2002). On babies and bathwater: Addressing the problems of identification of LD. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 155–168.
51.
SmeetsE. F. L. (2003). Op weg naar samenhang. De samenwerkingsverbanden Weer Samen Naar School [Towards coherence. Cooperation units Together to school again] Nijmegen, The Netherlands: ITS.
52.
SmitsJ. A. E.VorstH. C. M. (1991). Schoolvragenlijst [School questionnaire]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Berkhout.
53.
Stiehr-SmithD.NagleR. J. (1995). Self-perceptions and social comparisons among children with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 364–371.
54.
StoneW. L.La GrecaA. M. (1990). The social status of children with learning disabilities: A reexamination. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 32–37.
55.
United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child: Adopted by General Assembly resolution 44/25. New York: Author.
56.
UNESCO. (1988). UNESCO consultation on special education: Final report. Paris: Author.
57.
UNESCO. (1990). World declaration on education for all and framework of action to meet basic learning needs. Paris: Author.
58.
VaughnS.ElbaumB. E.SchummJ. S. (1996). The effects of inclusion on the social functioning of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 598–608.
59.
VaughnS.HoganA.HaagerD.KouzekananiK. (1992). Self-concept and peer-acceptation in students with LD: A four-to-five year prospective study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 43–50.
60.
VeermanJ. W.StraathofM. A. E.TreffersP. D. A.Van der BergB. R. H.Ten BrinkL. T. (1997). Handleiding competentiebelevingsschaal voor kinderen (CBSK) [Manual for The perceived competence scale for children]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
61.
WienerJ.HarrisP. J.ShirerC. (1990). Achievement and social-behavioral correlates of peer status in learning disabilities children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 114–127.
