In a 1986 study published in the Learning Disability Quarterly, Simmons and Kame'enui examined information found in popular periodicals about learning disabilities (LD) in an effort to understand what people learn about LD from these high-readership sources. After more than 20 years, advances in technology have brought significant changes to how people obtain and disseminate information. Therefore, we revisited the findings of Simmons and Kame'enui by investigating information about LD presented on the Internet. An analysis of the contents of 23 websites suggested that medically based etiologies are most frequently associated with LD, supporting the 1986 results. Unlike the 1986 findings, however, the interventions found on the Internet include a variety of educational supports designed to promote the success of students with LD in the general education environment. Situated in the context of the digital age, implications for LD organizations and future research are provided.
FarrellA. E. (1994). Desire and consumption: Women's magazines in the 1980s. American Quarterly, 46(4), 621–628.
13.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5), 14–20.
14.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.MathesP. G.LipseyM. W.RobertsP. H. (2002). Is learning disabilities just a fancy term for low achievement? A meta-analysis of reading differences between low achievers with and without the label. In BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 737–762). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
HenryP. D. (2002). Scholarly use of the Internet by faculty members: Factors and outcomes of change. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(1), 49–57.
16.
HorriganJ. (2008). Home broadband 2008: Adoption stalls for low-income Americans even as many broadband users opt for premium services that give them more speed. Retrieved July 15, 2008, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/257/reportdisplay.asp
17.
HuefnerD. S. (2006). Getting comfortable with special education law. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
18.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101–476, 20 U.S.C § 1413(h) (Supp. III 1997).
19.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997, Pub. L. 105–17, 20 U.S.C. § 1412(a)(16) (Supp. III 1997).
KameenuiE. J. (2007). A new paradigm: Responsiveness to Intervention. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5), 6–7.
22.
KedzieC. (1996). International implications for global democratization. In AndersonR. H.BiksonT. K.LawS. A.MitchellB. M. (Eds.), Universal access to e-mail: Feasibility and societal implications (pp. 151–168). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
23.
KeefeJ. W. (1991). Learning style: Cognitive and thinking skills. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
NachmiasF.GiladA. (2002). Needle in a haystack: Searching for information on the World Wide Web. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 475–487.
33.
National Center for Learning Disabilities. (2007). LD basics. Retrieved June 23, 2007, from www.ncld.org
34.
The National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities. (2007). Learning disabilities. Retrieved June 23, 2007, from www.nichcy.org
RichardsD. L. (2002). Making the national international: Information technology and government respect for human rights. In AllisonJ. E. (Ed.), Technology, development, and democracy (pp. 161–186). Albany: State University of New York Press.
39.
Schwab Learning. (2007). Great schools. Retrieved June 23, 2007, from www.schwablearning.org/
40.
SimmonsD. C.Kame'enuiE. J. (1986). Articulating learning disabilities for the public: A case of professional riddles. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 304–314.
41.
SummersE. G. (1986). The information flood in learning disabilities: A bibliometric analysis of the journal literature. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 49–60.
42.
SwansonH. L.AlfordL. (1987). An analysis of the current status of special education research and journal outlets. Remedial and Special Education, 8(6), 8–18.
43.
SwansonH. L.HoskynM. (1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 277–321.
TorgesenJ. K.DiceC. (1980). Characteristics of research on learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13(9), 5–9.
46.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2005). Computer and Internet use in the United States: 2003. Washington, DC: Author.
47.
U.S. Congress. (2001). No Child Left Behind Act of 2001: Conference report to accompany H.R. 1, report 107–334. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
48.
U.S. Department of Education. (2005). Twenty-seventh annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
49.
WeierM. H. (2007). Too much information. Information Week, 1133, 36–41.
