American Academy of School Psychology. (2004). Recommendation on comprehensive evaluation for learning disabilities. Communiqué 32(7), 12.
2.
BurnsM.AppletonJ.StehouwerJ.D. (2004). Empirical review of response-to-intervention research. Manuscript submitted for publication, University of Minnesota.
3.
BurnsM.SenesacB. (2004). Comparison of dual discrepancy criteria for diagnosis of unresponsiveness to intervention. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.
4.
GreshamF.ReschlyD.TillyD.FletcherJ.BurnsM.CristT.PrasseD.VanderwoodM.ShinnM. (2004). A comprehensive evaluation of learning disabilities: A response-to-intervention perspective. Communiqué33 (4), 34–35.
5.
McMasterK.FuchsD.FuchsL.ComptonD.(in press). Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children.
6.
MeyersB.MeyersJ.DenoS.L. (1980). Formative evaluation and teacher decision making: A follow-up (Research Report No. 41). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
7.
ReschlyD.YsseldykeJ.E. (2002). Paradigm shift: The past is not the future. In ThomasA.GrimesJ. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 3–20). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.)
8.
SarasonS.DorisJ. (1979). Educational handicap, public policy and social history. New York: Free Press.
9.
SpicuzzaR.YsseldykeJ.LemkuilA.KoscioleckS.BoysC.TeelucksinghE. (2001). Effects of using a curriculum-based monitoring system on the classroom instructional environment and math achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 39(6), 521542.
10.
StuebingK.FletcherJ.LeDeuxJ. (2002). Validity of IQ-dis- crepancy classification of learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 469–518.
11.
VanderHeydenA.M.WittJ.C.BarnettD.A. (2004). The emergence and possible futures of response to intervention. Manuscript submitted for publication, Louisiana State University.
12.
YsseldykeJ. (2001). Reflections on a career: 25 years of research on assessment and instructional decision-making. Exceptional Children, 67 (3), 295–310.
YsseldykeJ.E.DawsonM.LehrC.A.ReschlyD.ReynoldsM.TelzrowC. (1997). School psychology: A blueprint for the future of training and practice II. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
15.
YsseldykeJ.TardrewS. (2002). Differentiating math instruction. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Renaissance Learning.
16.
YsseldykeJ.ThurlowM.GradenJ.WessonC.AlgozzineB.DenoS. (1983). Generalizations from five years of research on assessment and decision making: The University of Minnesota Institute. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 4(1), 75–93.