A case study with two Finnish 10-year-old boys evaluated an intervention designed to promote the spelling skills of elementary school students with severe writing difficulties. The intervention comprised strategy instruction, procedural facilitation, and computer-assisted tutoring. Transfer was facilitated by involving teachers and parents. The results showed gains in spelling accuracy, spelling revision skills, decoding accuracy, and knowledge about the writing process from baseline to post-treatment phase. Transfer, parents' and teachers' participation, and the stability of intervention effects over a six-month follow-up period are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerningerV.W. (1999). Coordinating transcription and text generation in working memory during composition: Automatic and constructive processes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 99–112.
2.
BerningerV.W.AbbottR.D.WhitakerD.SylvesterL.NolenS. (1995). Integrating low- and high-level skills in instructional protocols for writing disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 293–309.
3.
BradleyL.BryantP. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read — a causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.
4.
BrownA. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In WeinertF.KluweR. (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.
5.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
DarchC.SimpsonR. (1990). Effectiveness of visual imagery versus rule-based strategies in teaching spelling to learning disabled students. Research in Rural Education, 7, 61–70.
7.
DunlapW.P.CortinaJ.M.VaslowJ.B.BurkeM.J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170–177.
8.
EnglertC.S. (1990). Unraveling the mysteries of writing through strategy instruction. In ScruggsT.E.WongB.Y.L. (Eds.), Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 186–223). New York: Springer-Verlag.
9.
EnglertC.S.RaphaelT.E.FearK.L.AndersonL. (1988). Students' metacognitive knowledge about how to write informational texts. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 18–46.
10.
GallimoreR.TharpR. (1990). Teaching mind in society: Teaching, schooling, and literate discourse. In MollL.C. (Ed.), Vygotsky and education. Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 175–205). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
GrahamS. (1999). Handwriting and spelling instruction for students with learning disabilities: A review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 78–98.
12.
GrahamS.FreemanS. (1986). Strategy training and teacher- vs. student-controlled study conditions: Effects on LD students' spelling performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 267–274.
13.
GrahamS.HarrisK. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 3–12.
14.
GrahamS.HarrisK.Fink-ChorzempaB. (2001). Is spelling causally related to learning to write and read? Treatment of spelling problems in beginning writers. Manuscript submitted for publication.
15.
GrahamS.MacArthurC. (1988). Improving learning disabled students' skills at revising essays produced on a word processor: Self-instructional strategy training. Journal of Special Education, 22, 133–152.
16.
HackerD.J.PlumbC.ButterfieldE.C.QuathamerD.HeinekenE. (1994). Text revision: Detection and correction of errors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 65–78.
17.
HarrisK.R.GrahamS. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
18.
HarrisK.R.GrahamS. (1999). Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 251–262.
19.
HayesJ. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In LevyC.M.RansdellS. (Eds.), The science of writing. Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
HayesJ.FlowerL. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In GreggL.SteinbergE.R. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
HayesJ.FlowerL.SchriverK.StratmanJ.CareyL. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In RosenbergS. (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics: Vol. 2 (pp. 176–240). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
HenryM.CalfeeR.LaSalleR. (1989). A structural approach to decoding and spelling. In McCormickS.ZutellJ. (Eds.), Cognitive and social perspectives for literacy research and instruction (pp. 155–163). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
23.
HäyrinenT.Serenius-SirveS.KorkmanM. (1999). LUKILASSE ([A test of decoding, reading comprehension, spelling, and basic mathematical skills]). Helsinki: Psykologien Kustannus Oy.
24.
JokelaJ.KajamiesA.KinnunenR.MäkiH.PoskipartaE. (2000). Aleksis®2 Virhejahti ([Aleksis®2 Error Chase]). Centre for Learning Research, University of Turku, Finland.
25.
KarlssonF. (1983). Suomen kielen äänne-ja muotorakenne ([Phonology and Morphology of Finnish]). Juva: WSOY.
26.
KelloggR.T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In LevyC.M.RansdellS. (Eds.), The science of writing. Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 57–71). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27.
KorkmanM. (1998). NEPSY — An adaptation of Luria's investigation for young children. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2, 375–392.
28.
KorkmanM.KirkU.KempS.L. (1997). NEPSY — hasten neuropsykologinen tutkimus ([A Neuropsychological Assessment for Children]). Helsinki: Psykologien Kustannus Oy.
29.
KromreyJ.D.Foster-JohnsonL. (1996). Determining the efficacy of intervention: The use of effect sizes for data analysis in single-subject research. Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 73–93.
30.
LaineM.VirtanenP. (1999). WordMill Lexical Search Program. Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Turku, Finland.
31.
LindemanJ. (1998). Ala-asteen lukutesti ALLU ([Reading test for elementary grades 1–6]). Centre for Learning Research, University of Turku, Finland.
32.
MacArthurC.A.GrahamS.HaynesJ.B.DeLaPazS. (1996). Spelling checkers and students with learning disabilities: Performance comparisons and impact on spelling. Journal of Special Education, 30, 35–57.
33.
MayesS.D.CalhounS.L.CrowellE.W. (2000). Learning disabilities and ADHD: Overlapping spectrum disorders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 417–424.
34.
McCutchenD.CovillA.HoyneS.H.MildesK. (1994). Individual differences in writing: Implications of translating fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 256–266.
35.
MäkiH.VoetenM.VaurasM.PoskipartaE. (2001). Predicting writing skill development with word recognition and preschool readiness skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 643–672.
RockE.E.FesslerM.A.ChurchR.P. (1997). The concomitance of learning disabilities and emotional/behavioural disorders: A conceptual model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 245–263.
38.
RoehlerL.R.CantlonD. (1997). Scaffolding: A powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms. In HoganK.PressleyM. (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning. Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 6–42). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
39.
de Saint-ExupéryC. (1986). Pikku prinssi ([Le Petit Prince]) (I. Packalén, Trans.). Porvoo: WSOY. (Original work published 1944)
40.
SandlerA.D.WatsonT.E.FootoM.LevineM.D.ColemanW.L.HooperS.R. (1992). Neurodevelopmental study of writing disorders in middle childhood. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 13, 17–23.
41.
SchneiderW.NäslundJ.C. (1993). The impact of early metalinguistic competencies and memory capacity on reading and spelling in elementary school: Results of the Munich Longitudinal Study on the Genesis of Individual Competencies (LOGIC). European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8, 273–287.
42.
SnyderB.PressleyM. (1995). Introduction to cognitive strategy instruction. In PressleyM.VoloshynV. (Eds.), Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children's academic performance (pp. 1–18). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
43.
TharpR.G.GallimoreR. (1988). Rousing minds to life. Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
VaurasM.RauhanummiT.KinnunenR.LepolaJ. (1999). Motivational vulnerability as a challenge for educational interventions. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 515–531.
45.
WechslerD. (1984). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children — Revised. Helsinki: Psykologien Kustannus Oy.
46.
WongB. (1986). A cognitive approach to teaching spelling. Exceptional Children, 53, 169–173.
