This study examined the experiences and views of students with learning disabilities regarding the homework they receive in their general education classes and identified ways that teachers and parents might positively affect students' performance. Subjects were 10 high school students identified as having learning disabilities. Individual interviews were conducted to elicit information from each student. An analysis of the interviews resulted in the emergence of three themes: (a) factors that make homework easy, (b) factors that make homework difficult, and (c) recommendations for teachers, students, and parents. The results, limitations of the study, and future research needs are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BirnhaumB. (1989). Increasing organizational skills and homework productivity with ninth grade emotionally handicapped and regular students (ERIC Document No. 321428). Washington, DC: Educational Research Information Service.
2.
BryanT.NelsonC. (1994). Doing homework: Perspectives of elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 488–499.
3.
CooperH.M. (1989). Homework. White Pines, NY: Longman.
4.
ElliottS.N. (1986). Children's ratings of the acceptability of classroom interventions for misbehavior: Findings and methodological considerations. Journal of School Psychology, 24, 23–35.
5.
EllisE.S.LenzB.K.SabornieE.J. (1987). Generalization and adaptation of learning strategies to natural environments: Part 2: Research into practice. Remedial and Special Education, 8 (2), 6–23.
6.
EpsteinJ.L. (1987). Parent involvement: What research says to administrators. Education and Urban Society, 19 (2), 119–136.
7.
EpsteinM.H.PollowayE.A.FoleyR.M.PattonJ.R. (1993). Homework: A comparison of teachers' and parents' perceptions of the problems experienced by students identified as having behavioral disorders, learning disabilities, or no disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 14, 40–50.
8.
FlaxmanE.IngerM. (1991). Parents and schooling in the 1990s. The ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center) Review, 1 (3), 2–6.
9.
FriendM.BursuckW.D. (1996). Including students with special needs: A practical guide for teachers. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
10.
GajriaM.SalendS. (1995). Homework practices of students with and without learning disabilities: A comparison. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 291–296.
11.
HendersonA. (1988). Parents are a school's best friend. Phi Delta Kappan, 10, 149–153.
12.
HocuttA.MartinE.McKinneyJ.D. (1990). Historical and legal context of mainstreaming. In LloydJ.W.SinghN.N.ReppA.C. (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues and models (pp. 17–78). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing.
13.
JayanthiM.BursuckW.D.EpsteinM.H.CumbladC. (1992). [School reform: Impact of homework on students with disabilities and their families]. Unpublished raw data.
14.
JayanthiM.SawyerV.NelsonJ.S.BursuckW.D.EpsteinM.H. (1995). Recommendations for homework-communication problems: Generated by parents, general education and special education teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 16 (4), 212–226.
MannonG.BlackwellJ. (1992). Parent involvement: Barriers and opportunities. The Urban Review, 24 (3), 219–226.
17.
MercerC.D.MercerA.R. (1993). Teaching students with learning problems. New York: Macmillan.
18.
MilesM.B.HubermanA.M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
OlympiaD.JensonW.R.NevilleM.(in press). Do it yourself homework manual: A sanity saver for parents. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
20.
PattonM.Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
ParkerW.C. (1984). Interviewing children: Problems and promise. Journal of Negro Education, 53 (1), 18–28.
22.
PollowayE.A.EpsteinM.H.BursuckW.D.JayanthiM.CumbladC. (1994). Homework practices of general education teachers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27 (8), 500–509.
23.
Report of the NASBE Study Group on Special Education. (1992). Winners all: A call for inclusive schools. Alexandria, VA: The National Association of School Boards of Education.
24.
SchumakerJ.B.DeshlerD.D. (1988). Implementing the Regular Education Initiative in secondary schools: A different ball game. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 36–42.
25.
SchummJ.S.VaughnS.SaumellL. (1992). What teachers do when the textbook is tough: Students speak out. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24 (4), 481–503.
26.
SmithM.L. (1987). Publishing qualitative research. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 173–183.
27.
StrukoffP.M.McLaughlinT.F.BialozorR.C. (1987). The effects of a daily report card system in increasing homework completion and accuracy in a special education setting. Techniques: A Journal for Remedial Education and Counseling, 3, 19–26.
28.
U.S. Department of Education. (1990). Twelfth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities education act. Washington, DC: U.S. Printing Office.
29.
U.S. Department of Education. (1992). Fourteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities education act. Washington, DC: U.S. Printing Office.
30.
U.S. Department of Education. (1993). Fifteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities education act. Washington, DC: U.S. Printing Office.
31.
VaughnS.SchummJ.S.KouzekananiK. (1993). What do students with learning disabilities think when their general education teachers make adaptations?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26 (8), 545–555.
32.
VaughnS.SchummJ.S.NiarhosF.J.DaughertyT. (1993). What do students think when teachers make adaptations?Teaching and Teacher Education, 9 (1), 107–117.
33.
WillM.C. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411–415.
