Drugs and drugs education policies are highly charged political topics. Despite its earlier commitment to evidence-based policy, in its final term of office the United Kingdom's former Labour government rejected evidence on the relative harm of some drugs and determined policy by dogma. This article provides an overview of these events and uses the work of Foucault and Baudrillard to consider them as instances of capricious government and of capricious perceptions of reality. It argues for the need to make explicit the truth claims of research if that research is to inform policy rather than be dismissed by policy makers. Although the arguments put forward here focus on drugs and drugs education policy, they are pertinent to all research engaging with the notions of power and education.
References
1.
Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) (1988) AIDS and Drug Misuse Part I. London: Home Office.
2.
Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) (1989) AIDS and Drug Misuse Part II. London: Home Office.
3.
Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) (2002) The Classification of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. London: Home Office.
4.
Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) (2008) Cannabis: Classification and public health. London: Home Office.
5.
Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) (2009) MDMA (‘Ecstasy’): A review of its harms and classification under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. London: Home Office.
6.
BallS. (1990) Politics and Policy Making in Education. London: Routledge.
7.
BaudrillardJ. (1981) For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign, trans. LevinC., St Louis, MO: Telos Press.
8.
BaudrillardJ. (1983) Simulations, trans. FossP.PattonP.BeitchmanP., New York: Semiotext(e).
BourdieuP. (1999) On Television, trans. FergusonP.P., New York: New Press.
18.
BridgesD.WattsM. (2009) Educational Research and Policy: Epistemological considerations, in BridgesD.SmeyersP.SmithR. (Eds) Evidence-based Education Policy: What evidence? What basis? Whose policy?Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
19.
ChomskyN. (1989) Necessary Illusions: Though control in democratic societies. London: Pluto Press.
20.
ChomskyN. (1991) Media Control: The spectacular achievements of propaganda. Westfield, NJ: Open Magazine.
21.
DeweyJ. (1916) Democracy and Education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
FoucaultM. (1979) Discipline and Punish: The birth of the prison, trans. SheridanA., Harmondsworth: Penguin.
24.
FoucaultM. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977, ed. & trans. GordonC., Brighton: Harvester Press.
25.
FoucaultM. (1983) Afterword, in DreyfusH.RabinowP. (Eds) Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
FreireP. (2000) Pedagogy of the Oppressed, trans. RamosM.B., New York: Continuum International. (Original work published 1970.)
27.
GutmannA. (1999) Democratic Education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
28.
HavelV. (1990) Disturbing the Peace: A conversation with Karel Hvizdala, ed. & trans. WilsonP., London: Faber & Faber.
29.
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (HCSTC) (2006) Drug Classification: Making a hash of it? Fifth Report of Session 2005–06. HC 1031. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
KingC. (2003) From Coronation Street to Oxford: Whatever next? The Philip Jones Memorial Lecture, Journal of Access Policy & Practice, 1(1), 69–78.
32.
LevinB. (2004) Making Research Matter More, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(56), 1–20.
33.
MacedoD.SteinbergS.R. (2007) Media Literacy: A reader. New York: Peter Lang.
34.
MerrinW. (2005) Baudrillard and the Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
35.
NussbaumM. (2004) Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, shame, and the law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
36.
NuttD. (2009a) Equasy: An overlooked addiction with implications for the current debate on drug harms, Journal of Psychopharmacology, 23(1), 3–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269881108099672.
NuttD.KingL.SaulsburyW.BlakemoreC. (2007) Developing a Rational Scale for Assessing the Risks of Drugs of Potential Misuse, Lancet, 369, 1047–1053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140–6736(07)60464–4.
39.
PerryA.AmadeoC.FletcherM.WalkerE. (2010) Instinct or Reason: How education policy is made and how we might make it better: Perspective report. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.
40.
PowellM., (Ed.) (1999) New Labour, New Welfare State? The ‘Third Way’ in British Social Policy. Bristol: Policy Press.
41.
RicoeurP. (1965) History and Truth, trans. KelbleyC.A., Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
42.
RothblattS. (2007) Education's Abiding Moral Dilemma: Merit and worth in the cross-Atlantic democracies, 1800–2006. Oxford: Symposium Books.
SchostakJ. (2009) Researching and Representing Wrongs, Injuries and Disagreements: Exploring strategies for radical research, Power and Education, 1(1), 2–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/power.2009.1.1.2.
45.
SenA. (1999) Democracy as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
SilverJ.R.ParryJ.M. (1991) Hazards of Horse-riding as a Popular Sport, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 25(2), 105–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.25.2.105.
48.
SteinbergS.R.KincheloeJ.L. (2010) Power, Emancipation, and Complexity: Employing critical theory, Power and Education, 2(2), 140–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/power.2010.2.2.140.
ThomasK.E.AnnestJ.L.GilchristJ.Bixby-HammettD.M. (2006) Non-fatal Horse Related Injuries Treated in Emergency Departments in the United States, 2001–2003, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 40(7), 619–626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2006.025858.
WattsM. (2009) Higher Education and Hyperreality, in SmeyersP.DepaepeM. (Eds) Educational Research: Educationalisation of social problems. Dordrecht: Springer.
