Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Within the last decade, several studies have investigated whether adjuvant treatment of breast cancer affects cognitive function. A number of prospective studies have demonstrated inconsistent results regarding whether chemotherapy affects cognitive function. Approximately half of the studies demonstrated subtle cognitive decline in a wide range of domains among some breast cancer patients following chemotherapy, and half did not. Concomitant changes in brain structure and function have been identified in neuroimaging and neurophysiologic studies. Estrogenic therapy has been specifically associated with deterioration in verbal memory and processing speed. However, evidence is mostly based on smaller studies with cross-sectional data. Breast cancer patients who underwent both chemotherapy and estrogenic therapy showed the most deterioration and the most persistant decline in cognitive function. Since cognitive impairment is subtle, if evident at all, discrepant findings are due to hormonal, physiological, psychological or temporal confounding variables and differences in study design. Neuropsychological training has been demonstrated to improve cognitive dysfunction experienced by breast cancer patients after chemotherapy. Future research may examine the unique impact of endocrine therapy on cognitive function with prospective, controlled trials, as well as the role of further confounding variables (e.g., menopausal status, cytokine deregulation, cortisol and concurrent medication).

Keywords

aromatase inhibitors breast cancer chemotherapy cognitive function cortisol cytokines endocrine therapy menopausal status tamoxifen

Breast cancer therapy consists of a combination of different treatment modalities, including surgery, radiation, chemotherapy and hormonal therapy, which represent standard treatment options. These treatments involve a range of side effects affecting women's quality of life, with potential effects on body image, mood, the occurence of hot flashes and induced menopause being among those highly prevalent. Furthermore, consequences of breast cancer treatment on cognitive function have been reported. A growing body of research suggests that chemotherapy has an impact on cognitive function in some breast cancer patients. Since estrogen has neuroprotective effects [1], endocrine therapy may influence cognitive function in addition to chemotherapy. Therefore, the present review will assess the consequences of breast cancer treatment on women's cognitive function, with a focus on the impact of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, and is based on a literature search of PubMed and PsycInfo databases (until January 2009) of published English language articles. Studies that described only subsamples of later studies have not been reported, so as not to bias the summary of results.

Chemotherapy & cognitive function

Some evidence supports the notion that chemotherapy regimens pass the blood–brain barrier [2]. Accordingly, treatment with chemotherapy may have some consequences for breast cancer patients' cognitive function (see Table 1 for a detailed description of observational studies on the effects of chemotherapy on cognitive function). The number of breast cancer patients affected by cognitive impairment in different studies reaches up to 61% [3,4], but most studies report that approximately 30% of patients experience subtle cognitive decline after treatment with chemotherapy [5 –10].

Table 1.

Observational studies on chemotherapy and cognitive function.

Design	Author	Time point investigated	Patients	Measure	Results	CD	Ref.
Two-arm; prospective	Collins et al. (2009)	Before CT; 1 month after completion; 1 year later	53 CT patients; 40 HT patients	Comp	Postmenopausal patients receiving CT were compared with patients on HT. CT patients demonstrated a transient decline after completion of TX (34 vs 13% for CT and HT, respectively), which was no longer evident at 1 year. CT patients on HT showed lower processing speed and verbal memory at 1-year follow-up.	No	[5]
One-arm; prospective	Jansen et al. (2008)	Prior to AT; 1 week post-CT	30 BC patients	Simple	Decreases in visuospatial skill and total cognitive scores following CT were found. Improvement in executive function was observed.	Yes	[19]
Three-arm; prospective	Mehlsen et al. (2008)	Before CT; 25 weeks later	34 BC patients; 12 cardiac patients; 12 healthy controls	Comp	No changes in cognitive function in BC patients after standard-dose CT compared with cardiac patients and healthy controls.	No	[20]
One-arm; prospective	Hermelink et al. (2007)	Baseline; at the end of preoperative CT; 1 year after baseline	101 BC patients	Comp	On average, compromised cognitive function was evident in five out of 12 tests at baseline. CD was observed in 27% and improvement in 28% of patients over time.	No	[8]
Three-arm; prospective	Bender et al. (2006)	After surgery; after completion of CT; 1 year post-CT	19 CT patients; 19 CT + TAM patients; 19 DCIS, no CT or TAM patients	Comp	CT + TAM group showed impairments in visual memory and verbal working memory. CT group showed deteriorations in verbal working memory only. Control group showed improvements suggestive of practice effects.	Yes	[14]
One-arm; prospective	Hurria et al. (2006)	Before CT; 6 months post-CT	28 postmenopausal BC patients	Comp	CD in 39% and improvement in 11% of women older than 65 years in the domains of learning new information, remote memory and working memory. Cognitive complaints at baseline predicted worse objective functioning at follow-up.	Yes	[9]
Three-arm; prospective	Jenkins et al. (2006)	Baseline; post-CT; 18 months later	85 CT patients; 43 HT patients; 49 healthy controls	Comp	No group or group by time effects on any cognitive function outcome measure. Induced menopause was associated with cognitive compromise. Age, education and intelligence predicted cognitive function across domains.	No	[21]
Four-arm; prospective	Schagen et al. (2006)	Before TX; 6 months after TX (12-month interval)	28 high-dose CT patients; 39 standard-dose CT patients; 57 no-CT patients; 60 healthy controls	Comp	No differences between groups at baseline were observed. CD was found in the high-dose CT group only.	Yes	[22]
One-arm; prospective	Wefel et al. (2004)	At baseline; 3 weeks post-CT; 1 year post-CT	18 BC patients	Comp	A total of 33% experienced cognitive impairment in at least one domain at baseline and 61% after completion of CT. Of those having shown impairment, 50% improved over time, whereas 50% remained stable. Domains of cognitive dysfunction were related to attention, learning and processing speed.	Yes	[4]
Two-arm; longitudinal	Fan et al. (2005)	At baseline; at 1 year; at 2 years	104 CT patients; 102 healthy controls	Simple	Patients differed in the percentage of moderate–severe cognitive dysfunction at baseline and at 1 year. Group differences were no longer evident at 2 years. Additional HT (TAM) had a minimal impact.	No	[15]
Four-arm; longitudinal	Schagen et al. (2002)	3- and 4-year follow-up	22 CTC patients; 23 FEC patients; 31 CMF patients; 27 no-AT patients	Comp	Improvement in cognitive function was observed in all CT groups from year 3 to 4 post-treatment, but not in the control group.	No	[71]
Two-arm; cross-sectional	Kreukels et al. (2008)	1 year post-CT; 4 years later	63 CT patients; 60 healthy controls	Simple	A total of 33% of CT patients were cognitively impaired compared with 10% of healthy controls. After CMF, impaired women showed longer P3 latencies, lower P3 amplitudes, longer reaction times and made more errors in an information processing task compared with nonimpaired women after CMF.	Yes	[6]
One-arm; cross-sectional	Downie et al. (2006)	Post-CT	21 BC patients	Simple	Abnormal scores were observed on memory for 48%, language for 61% and visuospatial functioning for 33% of participants.	Yes	[3]
Three-arm; cross-sectional	Scherwarth et al. (2006)	5 years after completion of TX	24 high-dose CT patients; 23 standard-dose CT patients; 29 early-stage BC, no-CT patients	Comp	No differences between high-dose CT, standard-dose CT and patients with early BC were found. Decrements in reaction time in all patient groups were observed. Global decrements were shown in 8, 13 and 3% of patients, respectively.	No	[23]
Two-arm; cross-sectional	Donovan et al. (2005)	6 months after completion of TX	60 CT patients; 83 no-CT patients	Comp	No group differences in any domain of cognitive function emerged; the same was true for the prevalence of impairment.	No	[24]
Three-arm; cross-sectional	Castellon et al. (2004)	2–5 years after surgery	36 CT patients; 17 no-CT patients; 19 healthy controls	Comp	CT patients performed worse in the domains of verbal learning, visuospatial functioning and visual memory compared with patients treated with surgery only. Those who received both CT and TAM showed the greatest compromise.	Yes	[17]
Two-arm; cross-sectional	Tchen et al. (2003)	Post-CT	100 CT patients; 100 healthy controls	Simple	A total of 16% showed moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment versus 4% in controls	Yes	[72]
Four-arm; cross-sectional	Ahles et al. (2002)	5 years post-diagnosis	35 CT patients (breast); 36 CT patients (lymphoma); 35 no-CT patients (breast); 36 no-CT patients (lymphoma)	Comp	Patients treated with CT showed lower scores on average, particularly in the domains of verbal memory and psychomotor functioning.	Yes	[18]
Three-arm; cross-sectional	Schagen et al. (2001)	2 years post-TX	17 CTC patients; 16 FEC patients; 14 no-CT patients	Comp	Comparison of high-dose versus standard-dose versus BC patients without CT treatment was conducted. Cognitive impairment was found in 32% of the high-dose group, 17% of the standard-dose group and in 9% of a control group of stage 1 BC patients not treated with CT.	Yes	[28]
Three-arm; cross-sectional	Brezden et al. (2000)	Median of 2 years after completion of adjuvant treatment	31 patients during CT (A); 40 patients 2 years post-CT (B); 36 healthy controls (C)	Simple	Significant differences in overall cognitive function scores between groups A and C were observed, with poorer function in patients receiving adjuvant CT. Differences remained significant when controlling for age, education level and menopausal status. More patients had moderate or severe cognitive impairment in groups A and B compared with controls.	Yes	[73]
Three-arm; cross-sectional	Schagen et al. (1999)	1.9 years post-CT; 2.4 years after surgery	20 CT + TAM patients; 19 CT patients; 34 no-AT patients	Comp	Patients treated with CMF reported significantly more problems with concentration (31 vs 6%) and memory (21 vs 3%) compared with the control patients. Impairment in cognitive function was found in 28% of the patients treated with CT compared with 12% of the patients in the control group. HT had no influence on patients' self-reports of symptoms or cognitive function. Cognitive impairment following CT was noticed in a broad domain of functioning, including attention, mental flexibility, speed of information processing, visual memory and motor function.	Yes	[12]
One-arm; cross-sectional	Wienecke et al. (1995)	5–12 months post-CT	28 CT patients	Comp	Participants scored below norms in domains of verbal and visual memory, mental flexibility, speed of processing, attention and concentration, visuospatial ability and motor function. Level of cognitive impairment was related to the length of treatment with CT.	Yes	[13]

AI: Aromatase inhibitor; AT: Adjuvant treatment; BC: Breast cancer; CD: Cognitive decline; CMF: Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and flourouracil; Comp: Comprehensive; CT: Chemotherapy; CTC: Carboplatin, thiotepa and cyclophosphamide; DCIS: Ductal carcinoma in situ; FEC: Flourouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide; HT: Hormonal therapy; TAM: Tamoxifen; TX: Treatment.

Cognitive impairment has been found in multiple domains of cognitive function; many studies demonstrated longer reaction times [6,11] and slower information processing [4 –6,9,12,13] in patients treated with chemotherapy. Furthermore, frequent domains of cognitive function affected by chemotherapy are working memory [9,14 –16] and verbal memory [5,13,16 –18]. In addition, some studies also provide evidence of associations between chemotherapy and deteriorations in visuospatial memory [3,12 –14,17,19], remote memory [9] and attention [4,12,13].

A few studies have also shown a dose–response relationship with breast cancer patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy demonstrating more severe cognitive impairment compared with women treated with standard-dose chemotherapy [10,12,18].

While most studies with a cross-sectional design concluded that breast cancer patients who had undergone chemotherapy provided evidence of some degree of cognitive impairment in different domains of functioning, the nine existing prospective studies provide a different picture [4,5,8,9,14,19 –22]. Of these, five studies reported overall decrements in cognitive function [4,9,14,19,22]. However, three [4,9,19] of these five studies are characterized as one-arm trials with 30 participants or less. Four prospective studies did not provide evidence of overall cognitive decline [8,20,23,24]. Furthermore, four of the nine studies also reported improvement of cognitive functioning in some patients [4,8,14,19].

Several factors may explain these discrepant findings between cross-sectional and prospective trials. Since some studies (see Table 2 ) suggest cognitive impairment even before commencement of adjuvant therapy [11,25], the validity of cross-sectional, as well as of longitudinal studies, is limited. Furthermore, discrepant treatment effects may also be due to subtle variations in sample composition and research design.

Table 2.

Cognitive function prior to/without adjuvant treatment.

Design	Author	Time points investigated	Patients	Measure	Results	CD	Ref.
Three-arm; cross-sectional	Ahles et al. (2008)	Prior to AT	120 stage 1–3 BC patients; 22 stage 0 BC patients; 45 healthy controls	Comp	Patients with invasive BC had longer reaction times than healthy controls. Patients with stages 1–3 BC had poorer than expected overall performance and longer reaction times than patients with stage 0 BC or healthy controls before initiation of AT. Correction for misclassification error: 22% (stages 1–3 BC) versus 0% (noninvasive) versus 4% (healthy controls) showed decrements in overall cognitive performance.	Yes	[11]
Two-arm; cross-sectional	Debess et al. (2008)	Prior to AT	124 BC patients; 224 healthy controls	Simple	BC patients did not show differences in cognitive function compared with the control group, but reported lower perceived cognitive function and lower quality of life.	No	[74]
One-arm; cross-sectional	Cimprich et al. (2005)	18 days before surgery	184 BC patients	Simple	Objective cognitive function was in the normative range of healthy persons. No relation between self-reported cognitive dysfunction and objective testing. Age and education were significant predictors of overall cognitive function. Menopausal status and presence of a chronic health condition were associated with test performance, but distress was not.	No	[26]
Two-arm, prospective	Cimprich et al. (2001)	Before surgery; 2 weeks postsurgery; 3 months postsurgery	47 postmenopausal BC patients; 48 healthy controls	Simple	Reduced performance in cognitive function before treatment, which persisted over several months in older women newly diagnosed with BC.	Yes	[25]

AT: Adjuvant treatment; BC: Breast cancer; CD: Cognitive decline; Comp: Comprehensive.

One possible explanation for decrements in objective cognitive function, even before commencement of chemotherapy, could be a ‘diagnostic shock’ following a diagnosis of cancer. Several studies have shown that objective cognitive function is not related to subjective cognitive complaints. Objective cognitive function has been predicted by age, education and IQ [7,21,26], whereas subjective cognitive function has been associated with negative affect and fatigue [17,26].

Study results are mixed regarding whether cognitive disturbances are transient [4,5] or permanent [16,21]. Although many recent studies are prospective in nature, they do not include a long-term follow-up and/or lack a control group of patients who did not undergo adjuvant treatment or, alternatively, healthy controls. Hence, the strongest evidence can be derived from prospective studies with long-term follow-up (≥1 year after completion of treatment with chemotherapy) that include a control group of women with breast cancer who received local treatment only. While one of these high-quality studies suggests no impact of chemotherapy on cognitive function [21], other studies provide evidence of cognitive disruption as being transient in nature [5] or demonstrate long-term persistence of cognitive decline in breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy [14]. Hence, study results remain inconclusive at present as to whether cognitive disruption is transient or permanent. The majority of studies, if evident at all, suggest subtle impairment in cognitive functioning in a subgroup of breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. In order to determine whether cognitive dysfunction is a consequence of chemotherapy treatment that persists in breast cancer patients, studies also need to control for the effect of endocrine treatment on cognitive function. Since many patients who have undergone chemotherapy usually continue with endocrine treatment for up to 5 years, interaction effects of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy need to be taken into account. Indeed, a few studies suggest that patients who had undergone both treatment modalities experienced the most pronounced cognitive disruption [5,14,17], and the domains of cognitive impairment appear to be distinct to the type of endocrine therapy [27]. Therefore, future studies should control for hormonal treatment.

Mechanisms

A number of studies have examined potential mechanisms by which treatment with chemotherapy may result in cognitive dysfunction. Among these are studies using electrophysiological, neuroimaging and genetic techniques, as well as studies investigating immune responses.

Event-related potential (ERP) studies assessed during a cognitive task detected electrophysiological alterations, such as reduced P3 latencies [28,29]. Differences were also observed between patients treated with different chemotherapy regimens 3–6 years post-treatment [29]. The extent of alteration was related to the degree of cognitive disruption, although not all studies were confirmatory [30]. Longer P3 latencies have been demonstrated for simple and complex cognitive tasks in patients who received treatment 5 years before the examination [30,31]. Schagen and co-authors found no correlation between neurophysiologic parameters and neuropsychological performance, except for an overall relation between longer P300 latencies and the total number of deviant test scores [28]. Furthermore, asymmetry of the α-rhythm of 0.5 Hz or more was detected in seven patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy, in two patients who had undergone standard chemotherapy and in none of the control patients. No differences were found between the groups with regard to frequency of α-rhythm, α-blocking or latency of P300. The absence of group differences in N1 suggests that early perceptual processes are not affected by chemotherapy [29].

Brain imaging studies conducted via functional MRI during a short-term recall task in breast cancer survivors 5–10 years after completion of chemotherapy demonstrated specific alterations in the activity of the frontal cortex, the cerebellum and the basal ganglia [32]. However, effects on the basal ganglia were only evident in patients treated with both chemotherapy and tamoxifen (TAM). Positron emission tomography imaging studies demonstrated lower resting brain metabolism and a larger area of frontal cortex activation in breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy [32].

White matter changes have been shown via structural MRI in women treated with high-dose chemotherapy [33]. Furthermore, a twin case study indicated small differences in neuropsychological test performance but striking contrasts in self-reported cognitive complaints as well as structural and functional MRI differences. Specifically, the twin who underwent chemotherapy had substantially more subjective cognitive complaints and more white matter hyperintensities on structural MRI. Using functional MRI, an expanded spatial extent of brain activation during working memory processing was found compared with the non-affected twin [34]. This study suggests that chemotherapy may not only be related to abnormalities in brain structure, but also to abnormalities in brain functioning. Furthermore, after completion of treatment with chemotherapy, compensatory processes may occur since differences in brain structure and functioning did not (or no longer) translate into discrepant neuropsychological performance.

Genetic investigations demonstrated that survivors with at least one ∊4 allele of the APOE gene scored significantly lower in visual memory and spatial ability domains, as well as tended to score lower in the psychomotor functioning domain when compared with survivors who did not carry an ∊4 allele of this gene [35]. The results of this study provide preliminary support for the hypothesis that the ∊4 allele of the APOE gene may be a potential genetic marker for increased vulnerability to chemotherapy-induced cognitive decline.

Both cognitive dysfunction [11,25] and elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines [36,37] have also been demonstrated in breast cancer patients before commencement of chemotherapy. Hence, cytokines released from tumor tissue might cause cognitive disorders before, during and after treatment [38]. Consequently, cognitive changes may also occur by inflammation, and treatment with chemotherapy may add to cognitive dysfunction through different pathways.

Endocrine therapy & cognitive function

A large body of research suggests that estrogen increases neuroplasticity, enhances or maintains verbal memory and reduces the risk of Alzheimer's disease [39]. By contrast, results of the Women's Health Initiative Memory Study (WHIMS) examining the use of hormone-replacement therapy (HRT) on cognitive function have been discouraging [40] and several theoretical and clinical issues with regard to the use and initiation of HRT have not yet been clarified [39]. In this trial women who underwent HRT performed worse in tests of cognitive function than participants who underwent natural menopause [40]. Derived from the WHIMS, the timing of HRT is considered critical for neuroprotective effects leading to the ‘critical period hypothesis’. This hypothesis suggests that the initiation of HRT should start around the time of the onset of menopause in order to display neuroprotective effects, whereas the initiation of HRT after estrogen depletion would result in null or even detrimental effects on memory [1].

In cancer patients, the effects of endocrine therapies on cognitive function have been studied to a lesser degree. Endocrine therapy for breast cancer includes treatment with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs). TAM and raloxifene (RLX) represent common SERMs. Unlike estrogen, SERMs have estrogen agonist effects on some tissues and estrogen antagonist effects on other tissues. TAM has estrogen antagonist effects on the breast but estrogen agonist effects on other tissues, such as the endometrium. The mode of action of TAM on the brain is not well understood.

Raloxifene is a drug that is not specifically for breast cancer patients but for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Similar to estrogen, RLX has agonist effects on bone and lipid metabolism, but estrogen antagonist effects on reproductive tissues. Hence, it does not increase the risk of breast and uterine cancer.

A second group of drugs, AIs, are used in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. AIs represent newer agents of endocrine therapy. While TAM blocks receptors of female hormones, AIs prevent the transformation (aromatization) of androgens into estrogen.

Observational studies of endocrine therapies on cognitive function in patients with breast cancer are described in more detail in Table 3 . Effects of TAM on cognitive function have been investigated in seven studies, most of which were cross-sectional and compared TAM users with AI users and/or healthy controls. Its use as an endocrine treatment for breast cancer has been associated with decrements in verbal memory [41 –45] and processing speed [41,44,45]. An early study [46] demonstrated no differences between past users and never users of TAM, but current users were shown to attain a lower complexity score in a narrative writing task.

Table 3.

Observational studies on endocrine therapy and cognitive function.

Design	Author	Time points investigated	Patients	Measure	Result	CD	Ref.
Two-arm; randomized, controlled trial	Jenkins et al. (2008).	Before randomization; 6 months; 24 months	111 Al patients; 116 placebo patients; all postmenopausal	Comp	No group differences emerged.	No	[53]
Three-arm; prospective	Collins et al. (2008)	Commencement of TX; 5–6 months later	31 TAM patients; 14 Al patients; 28 healthy controls	Comp	Patients treated with TAM or Al demonstrated lower processing speed and verbal memory, as well as worse overall cognitive functioning.	Yes	[41]
One-arm; prospective	Hermelink et al. (2008)	Baseline; at the end of preoperative CT; 1 year after baseline	101 TAM or Al patients	Comp	Induced menopause, TAM or Al were not associated with CD in women after neoadjuvant chemotherapy at 1-year follow-up. Favorable effect of induced menopause on one test of executive function was found.	No	[52]
Three-arm; cross-sectional	Schilder et al. (2009)	2 years after completion of AC	30 TAM patients; 50 Al patients; 48 healthy controls	Comp	Memory complaints were reported by 28% of AC/TAM users, 24% of AC/AI users and 6% of healthy controls. No differences in cognitive function between TAM and Al users was found; however, TAM users were worse in verbal functioning and Al users demonstrated slower manual motor speed. Both groups performed worse on verbal fluency and information processing speed when compared with the control group.	Yes	[27]
Two-arm; cross-sectional	Bender et al. (2007)	3 months after initiation of HT	16 TAM patients; 15 Al patients; all postmenopausal	Comp	Women treated with Al had poorer verbal and visual learning and memory than women who received TAM. Domains of impairment were verbal and visual memory.	Yes	[42]
Three-arm, cross-sectional	Eberling et al. (2004)	2.3 years after initation of TAM; 16.7 years after initiation of ERT	10 TAM patients; 15 HRT patients; 15 no-TAM, no-HRT patients; all postmenopausal	Simple	TAM group scored lower on a test of semantic memory and showed hypometabolism in the inferior and dorsal lateral frontal lobes and smaller hypocampal volumes	Yes	[43]
Two-arm; cross-sectional	Jenkins et al. (2004)	36 months (range: 12–60 months) after initiation of treatment	94 TAM, Al or both patients; 35 healthy controls	Comp	Impairments in verbal memory and psychomotor speed of treatment groups compared with healthy controls.	Yes	[44]
Two-arm, cross-sectional	Paganini-Hill et al. (2000)	19–139 months since diagnosis	710 TAM patients; 453 no-TAM patients; all postmenopausal	Simple	Little difference between women who had used TAM for the standard 5 years and never users on the three cognitive tests. However, more women who had used TAM for the standard term reported seeing their physician for memory problems than nonusers. This was especially true for current users of standard-term TAM. Current users also had a significantly lower mean complexity score on the narrative writing task. No differences were observed between past users and nonusers.	Yes?	[46]

AC: Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin; Al: Aromatase inhibitor; CD: Cognitive decline; Comp: Comprehensive; CT: Chemotherapy; ERT: Estrogen-replacement therapy; HRT: Hormone-replacement therapy

HT: Hormonal therapy; TAM: Tamoxifen; TX: Treatment.

By contrast, another SERM, RLX has demonstrated null [47 –49] or small [50,51] neuroprotective effects on the brain. In a large trial investigating treatment with RLX for 3 years, the drug was associated with reduced risk of cognitive impairment [51].

Aromatase inhibitors have been compared with TAM in terms of their effects on cognitive function in four studies. Of these, one study suggests that AIs have a comparable impact to TAM on cognition [44], while Bender et al. reported poorer verbal and visual memory in AI users compared with TAM users [42], and Schilder et al. found that TAM users fared worse in verbal functioning and AI users were slower on motor speed [27]. Concomitant lower plasma estrogen levels in women treated with AI compared with TAM could suggest a more profound effect of AI on cognitive function.

To date, only three prospective studies examining the effects of TAM and/or AI on cognitive function exist [41,52,53]. While Collins et al. found decrements in verbal memory and processing speed as well as in overall cognitive functioning in women with breast cancer treated with TAM or AI compared with healthy controls [41], another study [52] found no effect of TAM or AI treatment on memory in women who had previously undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, this study did not include a comparison with groups of women with endocrine treatment only or chemotherapy treatment only.

In contrast to the aforementioned studies, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial investigating AI versus placebo in postmenopausal women at risk for breast cancer [53] did not demonstrate differences in cognitive function for women treated with AI compared with placebo at 24-month follow-up. While this study was not conducted in breast cancer patients, its significance is based on a randomized, controlled trial design. Owing to the large sample size, it is not likely that an existing group difference could have been overlooked. In addition, confounders, such as previous treatment with a different chemotherapy regimen or menopausal status, were excluded.

Other hormonal agents, such as analogs of gonadotropin-releasing hormone, have not been investigated for their impact on cognitive function. These drugs (e.g., goserelin) are used in premenopausal women with breast cancer to ablate ovarian function. However, a few studies in healthy women suggest that cognitive function might not be affected by usage of gonadotropin-releasing hormone [54 –56].

Mechanisms

A few studies have examined the potential mechanisms of SERMs on brain function using MRI and positron emission tomography methods. Two studies compared three groups of postmenopausal women, women who had received either TAM, estrogen or neither [43,57]. Ernst and co-authors found that the groups treated with TAM or estrogen both showed lower concentrations on one of four metabolites in the basal ganglia [57]. The authors, therefore, concluded that TAM has similar effects to estrogen. By contrast, Eberling et al. demonstrated TAM users to have widespread hypometabolism in the interior, dorsal lateral and frontal lobes as well as smaller right and left hippocampal volumes [43]. Hippocampal volumes of women using neither TAM nor estrogen were intermediate to the two other groups. Nonusers also demonstrated lower metabolism in the inferior frontal and temporal cortexes compared with the estrogen users. Consequently, the two studies provide conflicting results. While one study [57] concludes that TAM has a similar effect to estrogen on brain metabolism, the other [43] showed effects of TAM that were distinct from estrogen users and nonusers. An animal study of ovarectomized rats investigating the effects of different SERMs and estrogen on hippocampal neurons found SERMs to have different dose-dependent neuroprotective effects that were distinct from estradiol [58], supporting the Eberling et al. findings in humans [43]. Differential effects of specific SERMs on brain function in an animal study [58] also correspond to neuropsychological findings suggesting that TAM probably has detrimental effects, whereas RLX probably has slightly favorable effects on some aspects of cognitive function.

Distinct effects of AIs on brain function have not been studied as yet. To conclude, mechanisms of estrogenic therapy for breast cancer on brain function have been scarcely studied and it remains to be clarified in what respect their effects are distinct versus comparable to the use of HRT.

Treatment of cognitive function

A few drugs as well as psychological interventions have been investigated to prevent cognitive decline in breast cancer patients (who were treated with chemotherapy). While one study suggests that erytropoetin, a drug for the prevention and treatment of anemia and fatigue in cancer patients, may have attenuated the cognitive impairment and fatigue that occurred during adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy [59], in another study, no effect of this drug on cognitive function was observed [60]. In addition, methylphenidate, a CNS stimulant approved for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and narcolepsy, did not show beneficial effects on memory [61]. A recent study demonstrated that modafinil, a drug used to treat sleep apnea, modestly improved short-term memory in breast cancer patients [62].

By contrast, behavioral interventions appear to have more potential to improve cognitive dysfunction in breast cancer patients who have undergone chemotherapy. Neuropsychological training, so called Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT), demonstrated improvements in objective measures of cognitive function and also improved stress management in dealing with memory problems in everyday life at 2- and 6-month follow-up [63]. The MAAT consists of a participant workbook, four individual monthly visits of 30–50 min and phone contacts between visits. The four cognitive–behavioral components include:

Education on memory and attention;

Self-awareness training;

Self-regulation emphasizing arousal reduction through relaxation training, activity scheduling and pacing;

Training of cognitive compensatory strategies.

The application of strategies was considered the homework between visits. The telephone contacts were intended to assist in applying the strategies.

With regard to the inhibition of mechanisms contributing to inflammation, a randomized, controlled trial using cognitive–behavioral stress management demonstrated increased benefit finding and reduced cortisol levels. Effects on cortisol were mediated by benefit finding [64]. A different trial demonstrated improved lymphocyte proliferation under the same treatment condition [65]. Neurodamaging effects of stress and inflammation have been indicated in a number of studies [66 –68]. Hence, behavioral interventions that usually target other goals may also prevent cognitive impairment in breast cancer patients.

Future perspective

Considering the inconsistent findings with regard to cognitive dysfunction due to treatment with chemotherapy, the characterization of subgroups at risk for cognitive decline would be an important target for future research. The identification of vulnerable subgroups would allow an early intervention targeted at maintaining cognitive function in these patients. Looking at studies that demonstrated neurophysiologic compensation [34], it can be assumed that prevention of cognitive impairment may be possible. As neuropsychological training and stress-management techniques have been effective in reversing cognitive decline, its preventive and rehabilitative application could have some merit for clinical practice.

Otherwise, in cases where reasonable choices exist between different chemotherapy regimens, there could be a preference to opt for the less aggressive regimen since evidence suggests a dose–response relationship with women treated with high-dose chemotherapy, demonstrating more pronounced cognitive symptoms compared with patients treated with standard-dose chemotherapy [10,12,18]. However, decision making in this regard should be carried out following extended counseling of the patient that allows her to weigh the pros and cons of each decisional option.

Owing to the fact that results on chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction were discrepant regarding whether they are transient or persistent, future studies should include longer follow-up to more thoroughly address this issue.

Several biological mechanisms have been identified that may underlie cognitive decline in breast cancer survivors treated with chemotherapy. If cognitive changes were transient in nature, it would be interesting to see whether biological alterations would also improve, or, in cases where neurophysiologic compensation is occurring, whether these effects are also associated with improvements in cognitive function assessed by neuropsychological testing.

Endocrine therapy has been demonstrated to have detrimental effects on cognitive function, specifically with regard to verbal memory and processing speed in most studies. However, these studies were mostly cross-sectional and one of the three prospective studies is a secondary data analysis of breast cancer patients that received prior treatment with chemotherapy [52]. Collins and co-authors found that postmenopausal women with breast cancer treated with TAM or AI demonstrated lower scores on verbal memory, processing speed and overall cognitive functioning compared with healthy controls [41]. By contrast, the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS)-II trial [53], a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial with a large sample of women at high risk for breast cancer, found no detrimental effect of AI on cognitive function.

While the results of the two latter studies are conficting, both studies are free of some major confounds, such as pretreatment with chemotherapy and mixed menopausal status. Consequently, effects of endocrine treatment on cognitive function need to be studied with more robust research designs, such as prospective trials with larger sample sizes controlling for major confounds (e.g., chemotherapy pretreatment, hormone-replacement pretreatment and menopausal status).

In some studies, patients treated with endocrine therapy in addition to chemotherapy performed worse cognitively compared with breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy alone, or the detrimental effects on cognition were more permanent than in patients treated with chemotherapy alone [5,14,17]. These findings may support the argument for a shared vulnerability of some women who experience cognitive decline as a consequence of chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy.

Little is known about whether menopausal status of patients affects the extent to which breast cancer patients experience cognitive decline in response to adjuvant treatment. Several studies were completed in postmenopausal women. Nevertheless, most research was conducted on samples of both pre- and post-menopausal women and, in most studies, a significant proportion of postmenopausal patients at some point underwent HRT. However, the small sample sizes of most existing controlled, prospective trials deal with problems of statistical power and hence may not reliably detect significant moderator effects. While early estrogen deprivation in premenopausal women may have more profound effects on long-term cognitive function compared with older women, the latter group's potential for compensation of cognitive dysfunction may be less likely since estrogen deprivation is ongoing after completion of adjuvant treatment. Similarly, with regard to the effects of chemotherapy on cognitive function, a higher potential for compensation in younger women may be assumed. Furthermore, few studies have included data on the effects of treatment-induced menopause on cognitive function [21,52] and their results are inconsistent. In addition, evidence from noncancer samples is inconclusive regarding whether induced menopause has detrimental effects on cognition [69].

Limitations of prior research include several methodological issues. The majority of existing research is based on a comprehensive assessment of cognitive function with a wide set of neuropsychological tests. The use of less sophisticated assessments captures the risk of low sensitivity to detect cognitive decline. Therefore, the use of the high-sensitivity cognitive screen appears to be inappropriate to measure cognitive function in breast cancer patients, since the instrument may not capture subtle cognitive decline [3].

Furthermore, meaningful results can only be drawn from prospective studies that contain a baseline assessment of cognitive function and include a control group. The choice of a control group of breast cancer patients who only received local treatment has the advantage that women across groups share the experience of a cancer diagnosis with its emotional turmoil and potential effects on cognition (since some studies [11,25] reported cognitive dysfunction even before commencement of adjuvant therapy). However, this choice of a control group may also represent patients with a better prognosis and better physical health. In addition, treatment of breast cancer is becoming more and more individualized, which makes the control of a myriad of potential confounds a challenge. For example, the use of antibody therapy has not been studied so far in terms of its consequences on cognitive function.

Findings concerning the effects of endocrine treatment on cognitive function suggest that breast cancer patients undergoing endocrine therapy also do not appear to represent an appropriate control group to examine the effects of chemotherapy on cognitive function.

Several studies used a matched comparison group of healthy women as a control group. This choice of control group does not account for illness-related confounds and hence, preferably, should be included in addition to a disease control group. Nonetheless, the inclusion of a healthy control group holds the possibility to account for practice effects or normal aging (for longer time intervals) as well as the possibility of heightening the sensitivity of the measurement of change in cognitive function [70]. Ouimet and co-authors suggest a standardized regression-based approach for individual-based analyses [70]. This method uses change scores of a matched control group of healthy individuals to account for practice effects in order to more reliably measure cognitive change in patients with breast cancer. This method has been shown to be more sensitive compared with group analyses and the reliable change index method [70].

No studies to date have investigated whether newer molecular-targeted therapies of breast cancer (e.g., trastuzumab) impact cognitive function of breast cancer survivors in the long term. Future research may address their impact on cognitive function or at least control their effects as moderators of traditional cancer treatment on cognitive function.

Executive summary

Chemotherapy & cognitive function

Half of the published prospective trials support the assumption that subtle cognitive decline in multiple domains of cognitive function occurs in some breast cancer patients, whereas other prospective studies have not demonstrated cognitive impairment following chemotherapy.

A few studies suggest a dose–response relationship with patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy experiencing a more pronounced cognitive dysfunction compared with standard-dose chemotherapy.

Some patients showed cognitive decline before initiation of adjuvant treatment.

Results regarding whether cognitive alterations are transient or permanent are inconsistent.

Cognitive impairment is correlated with age, education and IQ. Subjective cognitive complaints are not associated with objective cognitive function.

Mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced cognitive dysfunction

Some evidence supports the notion that chemotherapy regimens pass the blood–brain barrier.

A direct neurotoxic effect may lead to atrophy of cerebral grey and white matter.

Long-term alterations in the activity of the frontal cortex, the cerebellum and basal ganglia have been shown in breast cancer patients after treatment with chemotherapy.

Breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy demonstrated long-term lower resting brain metabolism compared with breast cancer patients who had never been treated with chemotherapy.

∊4 allele of APOE as a potential genetic risk marker for increased vulnerability to chemotherapy-induced cognitive decline.

Endocrine therapy & cognitive function

Cross-sectional studies suggest cognitive impairment specifically in verbal memory and processing speed in women treated with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors.

The scarce prospective data are inconsistent. The International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS)-II, a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in women at risk of breast cancer, did not show cognitive dysfunction in the aromatase inhibitor group compared with the control group.

Mechanisms of estrogenic therapy-induced cognitive dysfunction

Tamoxifen users have shown hypometabolism in the inferior and dorsal lateral frontal lobes and smaller hypocampal volumes. However, it remains to be clarified whether the effects are distinct for tamoxifen or are similar to the effects of estrogen on brain function.

The effects of aromatase inhibitors on brain function are unknown at present.

Treatment

Neuropsychological training (using Memory and Attention Adaptation Training, a manual-based, structured intervention) demonstrated improvements in objective measures of cognitive function.

Cognitive–behavioral stress management demonstrated reductions in cortisol levels, a potential mediator of cognitive dysfunction.

No approved drugs are available at present.

Future perspective

Future research may examine the unique impact of endocrine therapy on cancer therapy-related cognitive change with prospective, controlled trials.

Identification and characterization of vulnerable subgroups for cancer therapy-related cognitive change, as well as which patients have the potential to compensate for cognitive impairment would be useful in the future.

Potential confounders that should be controlled in future studies are menopausal status/induced menopause, concurrent medication (affecting the CNS), distress, fatique, change in symptom severity over time, cytokine dysregulation and cortisol.

In terms of potential moderators of cognitive dysfunction, the examination of the role of stress and inflammation on cognitive outcomes in breast cancer survivors merits further empirical attention.

Testing of the efficacy of neuropsychological training and its potential for compensation should be conducted.

Exploration of the effects of analogs of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (e.g., goserelin) and molecular-targeted therapies for breast cancer (e.g., trastuzumab) on cognitive function should be carried out.

Alternative models of cancer therapy-related cognitive change (since some patients showed cognitive dysfunction before commencement of adjuvant therapy) should be studied.

In conclusion, owing to the mixed and conflicting findings, it is not yet clear whether adjuvant treatment of breast cancer is associated with cognitive impairment. Since some cancer patients show cognitive compromise even before initiation of adjuvant treatment, other unknown factors may contribute to the phenomenon of cognitive change associated with breast cancer therapy. For example, some vulnerable patients may experience prolonged or more pronounced effects of anesthesia following breast surgery. The stress response resulting from a recent cancer diagnosis may also prevent some new patients from fully engaging and performing well in cognitive assessments.

Breast cancer patients' quality of life is compromised for a significant time during and even sometimes after completion of chemotherapy. The reduced physical health as a consequence of chemotherapy may impact cognitive function, although fatigue has been repeatedly shown not to be associated with ‘chemo brain’.

Future research should further investigate the role of estrogenic therapy for the phenomenon of breast cancer therapy-associated cognitive change as well as the fact that some patients demonstrate transient cognitive impairment while others report long-term consequences.

Footnotes

Andrea Vodermaier was supported by an Emerging Team grant of the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (#AQC83559). There are no conflicts of interest or financial interests associated with this work. The author has no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

References

Papers of special note have been highlighted as:

of interest

of considerable interest

Sherwin

: Estrogen and cognitive functioning in women. Endocrine Rev. 24(2), 133–151 (2003).

Ahles

Saykin

: Candidate mechanisms for chemotherapy-induced cognitive changes. Nat. Rev. Cancer 7(3), 192–201 (2007).

Excellent review of mechanisms underlying ‘chemo brain’.

Downie

Fan

Mar HG

Houédé-Tchen

Tannock

: Cognitive function, fatigue, and menopausal symptoms in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: evaluation with patient interview after formal assessment. Psychooncology 15(10), 921–930 (2006).

Wefel

Lenzi

Theriault

Davis

Meyers

: The cognitive sequelae of standard-dose adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast carcinoma: results of a prospective, randomized, longitudinal trial. Cancer 100(11), 2292–2299 (2004).

Collins

Mackenzie

Stewart

Bielajew

Verma

: Cognitive effects of chemotherapy in post-menopausal breast cancer patients 1 year after treatment. Psychooncology 18(2), 134–143 (2009).

10.

Kreukels

van Dam

Ridderinkhof

Boogerd

Schagen

: Persistent neurocognitive problems after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Clin. Breast Cancer 8(1), 80–87 (2008).

11.

Stewart

Collins

Mackenzie

Tomiak

Verma

Bielajew

: The cognitive effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage breast cancer: a prospective study. Psychooncology 17(2), 122–130 (2008).

12.

Hermelink

Untch

Lux

: Cognitive function during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: results of a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal study. Cancer 109(9), 1905–1913 (2007).

13.

Hurria

Rosen

Hudis

: Cognitive function of older patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a pilot prospective longitudinal study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 54(6), 925–931 (2006).

14.

van Dam

Schagen

Muller

: Impairment of cognitive function in women receiving adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose chemotherapy. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 90(3), 210–218 (1998).

15.

Ahles

Saykin

McDonald

: Cognitive function in breast cancer patients prior to adjuvant treatment. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 110(1), 143–152 (2008).

16.

Schagen

van Dam

Muller

Boogerd

Lindeboom

Bruning

: Cognitive deficits after postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma. Cancer 85(3), 640–650 (1999).

17.

Wieneke

Dienst

: Neuropsychological assessment of cognitive functioning following chemotherapy for breast cancer. Psychooncology 4, 61–66 (1995).

18.

Bender

Sereika

Berga

: Cognitive impairment associated with adjuvant therapy in breast cancer. Psychooncology 15(5), 422–430 (2006).

19.

Fan

Houédé-Tchen

: Fatigue, menopausal symptoms, and cognitive function in women after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: 1- and 2 year follow-up of a prospective controlled study. J. Clin. Oncol. 23(31), 8025–8032 (2005).

20.

Shilling

Jenkins

Morris

Deutsch

Bloomfield

: The effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on cognition in women with breast cancer – preliminary results of an observational longitudinal study. Breast 14(2), 142–150 (2005).

21.

Castellon

Ganz

Bower

Petersen

Abraham

Greendale

: Neurocognitive performance in breast cancer survivors exposed to adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 26(7), 955–969 (2004).

22.

Ahles

Saykin

Furstenberg

: Neuropsychologic impact of standard-dose systemic chemotherapy in long-term survivors of breast cancer and lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 20(2), 485–493 (2002).

23.

Jansen

Dodd

Miaskowski

Dowling

Kramer

: Preliminary results of a longitudinal study of changes in cognitive function in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Psychooncology 17(12), 1189–1195 (2008).

24.

Mehlsen

Pedersen

Jensen

Zachariae

: No indications of cognitive side-effects in a prospective study of breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Psychooncology 18(3), 248–257 (2009).

25.

Jenkins

Shilling

Deutsch

: A 3 year prospective study of the effects of adjuvant treatments on cognition in women with early stage breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer 94(6), 828–834 (2006).

26.

Schagen

Muller

Boogerd

Mellenbergh

van Dam

: Change in cognitive function after chemotherapy: a prospective longitudinal study in breast cancer patients. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 98(23), 1742–1745 (2006).

27.

Scherwath

Mehnert

Schleimer

: Neuropsychological function in high-risk breast cancer survivors after stem-cell supported high-dose therapy versus standard-dose chemotherapy: evaluation of long-term treatment effects. Ann. Oncol. 17(3), 415–423 (2006).

28.

Donovan

Small

Andrykowski

Schmitt

Munster

Jacobsen

: Cognitive functioning after adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma. Cancer 104(11), 2499–2507 (2005).

29.

Cimprich

Ronis

: Attention and symptom distress in women with and without breast cancer. Nurs. Res. 50(2), 86–94 (2001).

30.

Cimprich

Ronis

Trask

: Pre-treatment factors related to cognitive functioning in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Psychooncology 14(1), 70–78 (2005).

31.

Schilder

Eggens

Seynaeve

: Neuropsychological functioning in postmenopausal breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen or exemestane after AC-chemotherapy: cross-sectional findings from the neuropsychological TEAM-side study. Acta Oncol. 48(1), 76–85 (2009).

32.

Schagen

Hamburger

Muller

Boogerd

van Dam

: Neurophysiological evaluation of late effects of adjuvant high-dose chemotherapy on cognitive function. J. Neurooncol. 51(2), 159–165 (2001).

33.

Kreukels

Hamburger

de Ruiter

: ERP amplitude and latency in breast cancer survivors treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Clin. Neurophysiol. 119(3), 533–541 (2008).

34.

Kreukels

Schagen

Ridderinkhof

: Effects of high-dose and conventional-dose adjuvant chemotherapy on long-term cognitive sequelae in patients with breast cancer: an electrophysiologic study. Clin. Breast Cancer 7(1), 67–78 (2006).

35.

Kreukels

Schagen

Ridderinkhof

Boogerd

Hamburger

van Dam

: Electrophysiological correlates of information processing in breast-cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 94(1), 53–61 (2005).

36.

Silverman

Castellon

: Altered frontocortical, cerebellar, and basal ganglia activity in adjuvant-treated breast cancer survivors 5–10 years after chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 103(3), 303–311 (2007).

37.

Brown

Stemmer

Simon

: White matter disease induced by high-dose chemotherapy: longitudinal study with MR imaging and proton spectroscopy. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 19(2), 217–221 (1998).

38.

Ferguson

McDonald

Saykin

Ahles

: Brain structure and function differences in monozygotic twins: possible effects of breast cancer chemotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 25(25), 3866–3870 (2007).

39.

Ahles

Saykin

Noll

: The relationship of APOE genotype to neuropsychological performance in long-term cancer survivors treated with standard dose chemotherapy. Psychooncology 12(6), 612–619 (2003).

40.

Caras

Grigorescu

Stavaru

: Evidence for immune defects in breast and lung cancer patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 53(12), 1146–1152 (2004).

41.

Lyon

McCain

Walter

Schubert

: Cytokine comparisons between women with breast cancer and women with a negative breast biopsy. Nurs Res. 57(1), 51–58 (2008).

42.

Seruga

Zhang

Bernstein

Tannock

: Cytokines and their relationship to the symptoms and outcome of cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 8(11), 887–899 (2008).

43.

Sherwin

Henry

: Brain aging modulates the neuroprotective effects of estrogen on selective aspects of cognition in women: a critical review. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 29(1), 88–113 (2008).

44.

Provides an excellent overview and update regarding estrogenic influences on the brain.

45.

Espeland

Rapp

Shumaker

: Women's Health Initiative Memory Study. Conjugated equine estrogens and global cognitive function in postmenopausal women: Women's Health Initiative Memory Study. JAMA 291(24), 2959–2968 (2004).

46.

Presents outcomes of the Women's Health Initiative Hormone-Replacement Therapy study on cognitive function.

47.

Collins

Mackenzie

Stewart

Bielajew

Verma

: Cognitive effects of hormonal therapy in early stage breast cancer patients: a prospective study. Psychooncology 18(8), 811–821 (2008).

48.

Bender

Sereika

Brufsky

: Memory impairments with adjuvant anastrozole versus tamoxifen in women with early-stage breast cancer. Menopause 14(6), 995–998 (2007).

49.

Eberling

Tong-Turnbeaugh

Jagust

: Estrogen- and tamoxifen-associated effects on brain structure and function. Neuroimage 21(1), 364–371 (2004).

50.

Jenkins

Shilling

Fallowfield

Howell

Hutton

: Does hormone therapy for the treatment of breast cancer have a detrimental effect on memory and cognition? A pilot study. Psychooncology 13(1), 61–66 (2004).

51.

Shilling

Jenkins

Fallowfield

Howell

: The effects of hormone therapy on cognition in breast cancer. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 86(3–5), 405–412 (2003).

52.

Paganini-Hill

Clark

: Preliminary assessment of cognitive function in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 64(2), 165–176 (2000).

53.

Buckwalter

Geiger

Parsons

Handler

Howes

Lehmer

: Cognitive effects of short-term use of raloxifene: a randomized clinical trial. Int. J. Neurosci. 117(11), 1579–1590 (2007).

54.

Yaffe

Krueger

Sarkar

: Cognitive function in postmenopausal women treated with raloxifene. N. Engl. J. Med. 344(16), 1207–1213 (2001).

55.

Haskell

Richardson

: The effect of raloxifene on cognitive function in postmenopausal women: a randomized clinical trial. Conn. Med. 68, 355–358 (2004).

56.

Nickelsen

Lufkin

Riggs

Cox

Crook

: Raloxifene hydrochloride, a selective estrogen receptor modulator: safety assessment of effects on cognitive function and mood in postmenopausal women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 24(1), 115–128 (1999).

57.

Yaffe

Krueger

Cummings

: Effects of raloxifene on prevention of dementia and cognitive impairment in older women: the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial. Am. J. Psychiatry 162, 683–690 (2005).

58.

Hermelink

Henschel

Untch

Bauerfeind

Lux

Munzel

: Short-term effects of treatment-induced hormonal changes on cognitive function in breast cancer patients: results of a multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study. Cancer 113(9), 2431–2439 (2008).

59.

Jenkins

Ambroisine

Atkins

Cuzick

Howell

Fallowfield

: Effects of anastrozole on cognitive performance in postmenopausal women: a randomised, double-blind chemoprevention trial (IBIS II). Lancet Oncol. 9(10), 953–961 (2008).

60.

Presents results of the largest prospective trial of the effects of aromatase inhibitors on cognitive function.

61.

Sherwin

Tulandi

: ‘Add-back’ estrogen reverses cognitive deficits induced by a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in women with leiomyomata uteri. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 81(7), 2545–2549 (1996).

62.

Palomba

Orio

Jr Russo

Falbo

Amati

Zullo

: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist with or without raloxifene: effects on cognition, mood, and quality of life. Fertil. Steril. 82(2), 480–482 (2004).

63.

Grigorova

Sherwin

Tulandi

: Effects of treatment with leuprolide acetate depot on working memory and executive functions in young premenopausal women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 31(8), 935–947 (2006).

64.

Ernst

Chang

Cooray

: The effects of tamoxifen and estrogen on brain metabolism in elderly women. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 94(8), 592–597 (2002).

65.

Ciriza

Carrero

Azcoitia

Lundeen

Garcia-Segura

: Selective estrogen receptor modulators protect hippocampal neurons from kainic acid excitotoxicity: differences with the effect of estradiol. J. Neurobiol. 61(2), 209–221 (2004).

66.

O'Shaughnessy

Vukelja

Holmes

: Feasibility of quantifying the effects of epoetin alfa therapy on cognitive function in women with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin. Breast Cancer 5(6), 439–446 (2005).

67.

Fan

Park

: The influence of erythropoietin on cognitive function in women following chemotherapy for breast cancer. Psychooncology 18(2), 156–161 (2009).

68.

Fan

Mar HG

Clemons

: A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of the effects of d-methylphenidate on fatigue and cognitive dysfunction in women undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 16(6), 577–583 (2008).

69.

Kohli

Fisher

Tra

: The effect of modafinil on cognitive function in breast cancer survivors. Cancer 115 (12), 2605–2616 (2009).

70.

Ferguson

Ahles

Saykin

: Cognitive-behavioral management of chemotherapy-related cognitive change. Psychooncology 16(8), 772–777 (2007).

71.

Cruess

Antoni

McGregor

: Cognitive-behavioral stress management reduces serum cortisol by enhancing benefit finding among women being treated for early stage breast cancer. Psychosom. Med. 62(3), 304–308 (2000).

72.

McGregor

Antoni

Boyers

Alferi

Blomberg

Carver

: Cognitive-behavioral stress management increases benefit finding and immune function among women with early-stage breast cancer. J. Psychosom. Res. 56(1), 1–8 (2004).

73.

Heuser

Lammers

: Stress and the brain. Neurobiol. Aging 24(Suppl. 1), S69–S76 (2003).

74.

Hellhammer

Schlotz

Stone

Pirke

Hellhammer

: Allostatic load, perceived stress, and health: a prospective study in two age groups. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1032, 8–13 (2004).

75.

Wolf

Kuhlmann

Buss

Hellhammer

Kirschbaum

: Cortisol and memory retrieval in humans: influence of emotional valence. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1032, 195–197 (2004).

76.

Vearncombe

Pachana

: Is cognitive functioning detrimentally affected after early, induced menopause? Menopause 16(1), 188–198 (2009).

77.

Ouimet

Stewart

Collins

Schindler

Bielajew

: Measuring neuropsychological change following breast cancer treatment: an analysis of statistical models. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 31(1), 73–89 (2009).

78.

Provides methodological information for analyzing prospective data of cognitive function.

79.

Schagen

Muller

Boogerd

: Late effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on cognitive function: a follow-up study in breast cancer patients. Ann. Oncol. 13(9), 1387–1397 (2002).

80.

Tchen

Juffs

Downie

: Cognitive function, fatigue, and menopausal symptoms in women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 21(22), 4175–4183 (2003).

81.

Brezden

Phillips

Abdolell

Bunston

Tannock

: Cognitive function in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 18(14), 2695–2701 (2000).

82.

Debess

Riis

Ostergaard J

Pedersen

Ewertz

: Cognitive function and quality of life after surgery for early breast cancer in North Jutland, Denmark. Acta Oncol. 19, 1–9 (2008).

Breast Cancer Treatment and Cognitive Function: The Current State of Evidence,Underlying Mechanisms and Potential Treatments

Abstract

Keywords

Chemotherapy & cognitive function

Mechanisms

Endocrine therapy & cognitive function

Mechanisms

Treatment of cognitive function

Future perspective

Footnotes

References