This study examines the determinants of spending on social security programs. We draw predictions from industrialism and dependency theories for the explanation of social security programs. The explanations are tested with data on seventy-five nations, representative of core, semipheripheral and peripheral nations. Industrialization variables such a the percentage of older adults and economic productivity have strong effects in models involving all nations, as does multinational corporate (MNC) penetration in extraction, particularly when region is controlled; such penetration is negatively associated with spending on social security. We then look at industrialism and dependency effects for peripheral and non-core nations alone. The effects of all industrialization variables, except economic productivity, appear insignificant for peripheral nations, while the effects of region and multinational corporate penetration in extractive and agricultural industries appears significant. Models involving all non-core nations (peripheral and semi-peripheral) look more like models for all nations than for peripheral nations alone.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PampelF. C. and WilliamsonJ. B., Age Structure, Politics, and Cross-National Patterns of Public Pension Expenditures, American Sociological Review, 50, pp. 782–799, 1985.
2.
WilenskyH. L., The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public ExpendituresUniversity of California Press, Berkeley, 1975.
3.
CutrightP., Political Structure, Economic Development and National Security Programs, American Journal of Sociology, 70, pp. 537–548, 1965.
4.
WilliamsonJ. B. and PampelF. C., Politics, Class, and Growth in Social Security Effort: A Cross-National Analysis, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 27, pp. 15–30, 1986.
5.
CowgillD. O., Aging Around the WorldWadsworth, Belmont, California, 1986.
6.
GraebnerW., A History of RetirementYale University Press, New Haven, 1980.
7.
MylesJ., Old Age in the Welfare StateLittle, Brown and Company, Boston, 1984.
8.
EntwisleB. and WinegardenC. K., Fertility and Pension Programs in LDCs: A Model of Mutual Reinforcement, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 32, pp. 331–354, 1984.
9.
LenskiG., Power and Privilege: A Theory of Social StratificationMcGraw-Hill, New York, 1966.
10.
HendricksJ., The Elderly in Society: Beyond Modernization, Social Science History, 6, pp. 321–345, 1982.
11.
NeysmithS. M. and EdwardhJ., Economic Dependency in the 1980s: Its Impact on Third World Elderly, Ageing and Society, 89, pp. 350–372, 1984.
12.
TiggesL. and CowgillD. O., Aging from the World-System Perspective: An Alternative to Modernization Theory, Paper presented at the meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Toronto, November 8–12, 1981.
13.
FrankA. G., Latin America: Underdevelopment or RevolutionMonthly Review, New York, 1969.
14.
WallersteinI., The Capitalist World-EconomyCambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979.
15.
WallersteinI., The Modern World System II: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy 1600–1750Academic Press, New York, 1980.
16.
HicksN. L., Growth vs. Basic Needs: Is There a Trade-Off?, World Development, 7, pp. 985–994, 1979.
17.
HicksN. L. and StreetenP. P., Indicators of Development: The Search for a Basic Needs Yardstick, World Development, 7, pp. 567–580, 1979.
18.
StreetenP. P., Basic Needs: Premises and Promises, Journal of Policy Modeling, 1, pp. 136–146, 1979.
19.
DixonW. J., Trade Concentration, Economic Growth, and the Provision of Basic Human Needs, Social Science Quarterly, 65, pp. 761–774, 1985.
20.
LondonB. and WilliamsB. A., Multinational Corporate Penetration, Protest, and Basic Needs Provision in Non-Core Nations: A Cross-national Analysis, Social Forces, 66, pp. 747–773, 1988.
21.
BornschierV. and Chase-DunnC., Transnational Corporations and UnderdevelopmentPraeger, New York, 1985.
22.
GeorgeS., How the Other Half Dies: The Real Reasons for World HungerRowman and Allenheld, Totowa, New Jersey, 1977.
23.
MoranT., Multinational Corporations and Dependency: A Dialogue for Dependentistas and Non-Dependentistas, International Organization, 32, pp. 79–100, 1970.
24.
O'ConnorJ., The Fiscal Crisis of the StateSt. Martin's Press, New York, 1973.
25.
HicksA. and SwankD., On the Political Economy of Welfare Expansion: A Comparative Analysis of 18 Advanced Capitalist Democracies, 1960–1971, Comparative Political Studies, 17, pp. 81–120, 1984.
26.
PrebischR., The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal ProblemsUnited Nations, New York, 1950.
27.
WolfeM., Social Security and Development: The Latin American Experience, in The Role of Social Security in Economic Development, KassalowEverett M. (ed.), U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington, D. C., 1969.
28.
Mesa-LagoC., Comparative Study of the Development of Social Security in Latin America, International Social Security Review, 2, pp. 127–152, 1986.
29.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Programs Throughout the World 1986U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1987.
30.
SnyderD. and KickE., Structural Position in the World System and Economic Growth, 1955–1970: A Multiple Network Analysis of Transnational Interaction, American Journal of Sociology, 84, pp. 1097–1126, 1979.
31.
BollenK., World System Position, Dependency, and Democracy: The Cross-National Evidence, American Sociological Review, 48, pp. 468–479, 1983.
32.
International Monetary Fund, Government Finance Statistics YearbookIMF, Washington, D.C., 1986.
33.
United Nations, Selected Demographic Indicators by Country, 1950–2000: Demographic Estimates and Projections as Assessed in 1976United Nations, New York, 1981.
34.
United Nations, Demographic YearbookUnited Nations, New York, 1981.
35.
BollenK., Issues in the Comparative Measurement of Political Democracy, American Sociological Review, 45, pp. 370–390, 1980.
36.
CardosoF. H., Associated-dependent Development: Theoretical and Practical Implications, in Authoritarian Brazil, edited by StepanA., Yale University Press, New Haven, 1973.
37.
CardosoF. H. and FalettoE., Dependency and Development in Latin America, University of California Press, 1979.
38.
EvansP., Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational State and Local Capital in BrazilPrinceton University Press, Princeton, 1979.
39.
Ballmer-CaoT. and ScheideggerJ., Compendium of Data for World-System Analysis. Special Issue (March) of the Bulletin of the Sociological Institute of the University of Zurich, edited by BornschierV. and HeintzP., 1979.
40.
MylesJ., Comparative Public Policies For the Elderly: Frameworks and Resources for Analysis, in Old Age and the Welfare State, GuillemardAnne-Marie (ed.), Sage, London, pp. 19–44, 1983.
41.
Chase-DunnC., The Effects of International Economic Dependency on Development and Inequality: A Cross-National Study, American Sociological Review, 40, pp. 720–738, 1975.
42.
JacobsJ., Cities and the Wealth of NationsRandom House, New York, 1984.
