Abstract
In their 2002 study comparing Early Navajo period tree ring dates and thermoluminescence (TL) results from sherds and fire-altered rocks, Dykeman et al. (2002:145) applaud the “remarkable correspondence between tree-ring and thermoluminescence results.” However, re-examination of their data suggests that the rate of certain correspondence (40%) is low, and mathematical modeling shows that a similar rate (35%) could be achieved with random guesses for dates. As the Dykeman et al. (2002) article was presented to champion the use of TL dating on sherds and fire-altered rocks, this re-examination yields a call for more extensive controlled testing of the TL method before its widespread use in North American archaeology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
