Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Williamson (44DW1) is a quarry-related Paleoindian site located in southeastern Virginia. The site was studied between 1992 and 1994 and involved both excavation and uncontrolled surface collection. The surface collection portion of the investigation was conducted in the upland area of the site, where stratigraphic integrity was limited and a preponderance of exposed Paleo-indian lithic artifacts was present. Over the two-year period, 161 cores and core fragments were recovered. By type and quantity, the whole forms included: 29 bifacial-discoidal, 23 angular-spheroid-amorphous, 12 tabular-block, and 6 polyhedral-conical cores. Approximately 55 percent of the collected cores contained cortex. It was concluded that the Williamson site occupants prepared and used a wide variety of core sizes and shapes. This finding was thought to be related to the diversity of raw material present at Williamson, including nodules, tabular plates, cobbles, and boulders. Apparently, primary material deposits were more commonly quarried by the site occupants. Evidence of thermal alteration was poorly represented in the core collection, a finding perhaps related to the high lithic quality of the Williamson material. A significant portion of the non-bifacial cores in the collection was classified as angular forms, indicating that an opportunistic flake-removal strategy was likely operative, with little consideration given to material conservation while at the quarry. This view was corroborated by the wasteful discard of viable cores at Williamson.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benthall

J. L.

and McCary

B. C.

1973 The Williamson Site: A New Approach, Archaeology of Eastern North America, 1:1, pp. 127–134.

Callahan

1979 The Basics of Biface Knapping in the Eastern Fluted Point Tradition: A Manual for Flintknappers and Lithic Analysts, Archaeology of Eastern North America, 7:1, pp. 1–180.

Carr

K. W.

1987 Lithic Reduction Sequences and Quarry Utilization at the Shoop and 50 Paleoindian Sites, paper presented at the Eastern Paleoindian Lithic Resource Utilization Symposium, 52nd Annual Society for American Archeology.

Crabtree

D. E.

1972 An Introduction to Flintworking, Occasional Papers of the Ohio State University Museum, No. 28.

Daniel

I. R.

and Wisenbaker

1987 Harney Flats: A Florida Paleo-Indian Site, Baywood Publishing, Amityville, New York.

Dragoo

D. W.

1973 Wells Creek—An Early Man Site in Stewart County, Tennessee, Archaeology of Eastern North America, 1:1, pp. 1–55.

Haynes

1972 Stratigraphic Investigations at the Williamson Site, Dinwiddie County, Virginia, The Chesopiean, 10:4, pp. 107–113.

Hill

P. J.

1996 An Analysis of the Williamson Site: Examination of Intrasite Variation, Overall Site Function, and Settlement Pattern Position of a Paleoindian Period Site, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C.

Hill

P. J.

1997a A Re-examination of the Williamson Site in Dinwiddie County, Virginia: An Interpretation of Intrasite Variation, Archaeology of Eastern North America, 25, pp. 159–173.

10.

Hill

P. J.

1997b An Interpretation of the Lithic Technology Employed at a Paleoindian/Early Archaic Site in Dinwiddie County, Virginia, Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology, 13, pp. 105–124.

11.

Hill

P. J.

1998 Recent Excavations at the Williamson Site: A Quarry-Related Paleoindian/Early Archaic Site in Dinwiddie County, Virginia, North American Archaeologist, 19:1, 35–58.

12.

Hill

P. J.

2001 A Preliminary Examination of Cores Surface Collected from the Williamson Paleoindian Site “44DW1” in Dinwiddie County, Virginia, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Middle Atlantic Archeological Conference, March 23-25, Ocean City, Maryland.

13.

Hill

P. J.

n.d. A Study of Biface Technology at the Williamson Paleoindian Site in Southeastern Virginia: An Examination of Biface Reduction Utilizing the Callahan Model, American Antiquity (manuscript under review).

14.

Johnson

M. F.

1989 The Lithic Technology and Material Culture of the First Virginians: An Eastern Clovis Perspective, in Paleoindian Research in Virginia: A Synthesis, Wittkofski

J. M.

(ed.), Special Publication Number 19 of the Archeological Society of Virginia, pp. 95–138.

15.

McCary

B. C.

and Bittner

G. R.

1978 Excavation at the Williamson Site, Dinwiddie County, Virginia, Archeological Society of Virginia, Quarterly Bulletin, 33:2, pp. 45–60.

16.

McNett

C. W.

1985 Artifact Morphology and Chronology at the Shawnee Minisink Site, in Shawnee Minisink: A Stratified Paleoindian-Archaic Site in the Upper Delaware Valley of Pennsylvania, McNett

C. W.

(ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 83–120.

17.

Moeller

R. W.

1980 6LF21: A Paleo-Indian Site in Western Connecticut, American Indian Archaeological Institute, Occasional Paper Number 2, Washington, Connecticut.

18.

Painter

1963 Paleo Man's Tool Kit, The Chesopiean, 1:6, pp. 10–13.

19.

Roth

B. J.

and Dibble

H. L.

1998 Production and Transport of Blanks and Tools at the French Middle Paleolithic Site of Combe-Capelle Bas, American Antiquity, 63:1, pp. 47–62.

20.

Verrey

1986 Paleoindian Stone Tool Manufacture at the Thunderbird Site (44WR11), Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C.

21.

Whittaker

J. C.

1994 Flintknapping: Making and Understanding Stone Tools, University of Texas Press, Austin.

An Examination of Cores Surface Collected from the Williamson Site (44DW1): A Paleoindian Quarry-Related Site Located in Southeastern Virginia

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References