Informal family caregivers from a sample of 110 hospitalized elderly Jewish Jerusalemites were queried regarding their perceptions of filial responsibility and the supports they provide their parent(s). A path model was examined in which the outcome variable was a measure of the caregivers' expectations of future support. Background variables considered included sociodemographic variables and religiosity of the caregivers, family problems, proximity to the dependent parent, ADL, and length of dependency of the elderly care recipient. The analysis found future expectations of support to be explained principally by perceptions of filial responsibility, that were in turn explained by religiosity of the caregiver. Current support provided was influenced by proximity to the care recipient, ADL, length of dependency, and perceptions of filial responsibility. The implications of these findings for promotion of informal care are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
JohnsonM. L., Interweaving of Informal and Formal Care—A Challenge to Some of the Myths, paper presented at the 13th International Congress of Gerontology, New York, 1985.
2.
WhittakerJ., Integrating Formal and Informal Social Care: A Conceptual Framework, British Journal of Social Work, 16, pp. 39–62, 1986.
3.
HodderJ., Supporting the Informal Carers, in Support Networks in a Caring Community, YoderJ. A.JonkerJ. M. L., and LeaperR. A. B. (eds.), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 155–161, 1985.
4.
WengerG. C., Elderly Carers: The Need for Appropriate Intervention, Ageing and Society, 10, pp. 197–219, 1990.
5.
LitwakE., Helping the Elderly: The Complementary Roles of Informal Networks and Formal Systems, Guilford Press, New York, 1985.
6.
BiegelD.ShoreB., and GordonE., Building Support Networks for the Elderly: Theory and Application, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California, 1981.
7.
WalkerA., Enlarging the Caring Capacity of the Community: Informal Support and the Welfare State, International Journal of Health Services, 17, pp. 369–386, 1987.
8.
BrodyE. M., Parent Care as a Normative Family Stress, Gerontologist, 25, pp. 19–29, 1985.
9.
MatthewsS. H. and RosnerT. T., Shared Filial Responsibility: The Family as the Primary Caregiver, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, pp. 185–195, 1988.
10.
HorowitzA., Family Caregiving to the Frail Elderly, Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 6, pp. 194–246, 1985.
11.
NoelkerL. S. and WallaceR. W., The Organization of Family Care for Frail Elderly, Journal of Family Issues, 6, pp. 23–44, 1985.
12.
DaatlandS. O., The Public—Private Mix: The Roles of Families and the Public Care System in the Welfare State, European Journal of Gerontology, 1, pp. 170–183, 1992.
13.
KrauseN. and MarkidesK., Measuring Social Support Among Older Adults, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 30, pp. 37–53, 1990.
14.
SeelbackW. C., Gender Differences in Expectations for Filial Responsibility, Gerontologist, 17, pp. 421–425, 1977.
15.
SchorrA., Thy Father and Thy Mother … A Second Look at Filial Responsibility and Family Policy, SSA Publication no. 13-11953, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D. C., 1980.
16.
SeelbackW. C. and SauerW. J., Filial Responsibility Expectations and Morale Among Aged Parents, Gerontologist, 17, pp. 492–499, 1977.
17.
HansonS. L.SeelbackW. C., and SauerW. J., Racial and Cohort Variations in Filial Responsibility Norms, Gerontologist, 23, pp. 626–631, 1983.
18.
FinleyN.RobertsF. M., and BanahanB., Motivates and Inhibitors of Attitudes of Filial Obligation Toward Aging Parents, Gerontologist, 28, pp. 73–76, 1988.
19.
StollerE. P., Parental Caregiving by Adult Children, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, pp. 851–858, 1983.
20.
SungK., A New Look at Filial Piety: Ideals and Practices of Family-Centered Parent Care in Korea, Gerontologist, 30, pp. 610–617, 1990.
21.
BlustE. P. and ScheidtR. J., Perceptions of Filial Responsibility by Elderly Filipino Widows and their Primary Caregivers, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 26, pp. 91–106, 1988.
22.
CicirelliV. G., Adult Children's Attachment and Helping Behavior to Elderly Parents: A Path Model, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, pp. 815–825, 1983.
23.
CowardR. T. and DwyerJ. W., The Association of Gender, Sibling, Network Composition and Patterns of Parental Care by Adult Children, Research on Aging, 12, pp. 158–181, 1990.
24.
WakeS. and SporakowskiM. J., Intergenerational Comparison of Attitudes Toward Supporting Aged Parents, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 34, pp. 42–48, 1972.
25.
CicirelliV. G., A Comparison of Helping Behavior to Elderly Parents of Adult Children with Intact and Disrupted Marriages, Gerontologist, 23, pp. 619–625, 1983.
26.
JohnsonC. L. and CatalanoD., A Longitudinal Study of Family Supports to Impaired Elderly, Gerontologist, 23, pp. 612–618, 1983.
27.
PenningM. and ChappellN., Ethnicity and Informal Supports Among Older Adults, Journal of Aging Studies, 1, pp. 145–160, 1987.
28.
RosenthalC., Family Supports in Later Life: Does Ethnicity Make a Difference?, Gerontologist, 26, pp. 19–24, 1986.
29.
Bar-LevM., Graduates of High School eshivot in Israel: Between Tradition and Modernity, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, 1977.
30.
AlwinD. F. and HauserR. M., The Decomposition of Effects in Path Analysis, American Sociological Review, 40, pp. 37–47, 1975.
